In October, twenty-two people deported from the United States arrived in Jamaica — not their home country, but a transit nation they may never have visited — as part of a quietly expanding American policy of third-country deportation now spanning at least thirty-five nations. Jamaica, which signed its agreement in June, framed its role as a temporary waystation, yet the deal was never debated publicly, and the deportees' destinations remain undisclosed. The episode illuminates something older and darker in the human story: the use of geography as punishment, and of uncertainty as a tool of pow
Jamaica receives first US third-country deportations amid secrecy concerns
22 individuals were deported to Jamaica without disclosed destinations, raising concerns about due process and potential exposure to danger in conflict-affected third countries.
Jamaicans are being asked to trust a secret document
Mark
Why does it matter that Jamaica kept this agreement secret? Isn't that just normal diplomatic practice?
Mimi
Because the people affected—both the deportees and Jamaicans themselves—had no say in it. A security arrangement that touches public services and community safety should be debated openly, especially when it involves receiving people from another country.
Luke
But we should be careful here. The source says the US refused to allow it to be public. So Jamaica didn't choose secrecy—the US did. That's an important distinction.
Mark
What happens to these twenty-two people now?
Mimi
They're supposed to be transferred onward to their home countries or other destinations. But they arrived at an undisclosed location, so we don't actually know what's happening to them right now.
Luke
Right. And the source doesn't tell us who these people are, where they're from, or what their circumstances are. We know they exist, but we don't know their stories.
Mark
Is Jamaica actually equipped to handle this? Do they have the infrastructure?
Mimi
The government says the International Organization for Migration is handling the care and paying for it. Jamaica isn't spending its own money. But that doesn't mean the country has the capacity or expertise to manage what comes next.
Luke
The source doesn't give us any information about Jamaica's actual capacity or whether the IOM has the resources it claims. We're taking the government's word for it.
Mark
How many countries are doing this now?
Mimi
At least thirty-five have signed agreements. The US has budgeted four hundred and ten million dollars for the whole program. It's massive.
Luke
"At least thirty-five"—that's important. We don't have a complete count. And we don't know how many people have actually been deported through these agreements or where they've ended up.
Mark
What's the legal argument against this?
Mimi
People are being removed without due process, without a hearing. Some are being sent to countries where they face real danger, or to places the US courts already said they couldn't go. It's a way around the law.
Luke
The courts haven't ruled yet, though. These are ongoing challenges. We don't know how they'll turn out. And the source includes one anonymous quote about the intent being to scare people—that's powerful, but it's one official's view, not confirmed policy.
Der Puls
- Twenty-two deportees landed in Kingston and were swiftly moved to an unnamed location, making visible for the first time a vast, largely hidden machinery of third-country removal.
- Opposition leaders are sounding alarms over a secret agreement that was never debated in parliament, with one lawmaker warning that Jamaicans are being asked to trust a document they have never seen.
- The foreign minister acknowledged the secrecy but placed the blame on Washington — the Trump administration, she said, simply refused to allow the deal to be published.
- Human rights advocates argue the entire system is designed to circumvent US court orders protecting deportees from being returned to dangerous countries, by routing them through third nations first.
- A US official quoted anonymously in a Senate report stripped away the diplomatic language: the purpose, the official said, is to frighten people — fear, not logistics, is the policy.
- Legal challenges are advancing in American courts, but for now the machinery continues to move, and the people inside it continue to disappear into undisclosed places.
In October, twenty-two people deported from the United States arrived in Jamaica — not their home country, but a transit nation they may never have visited — as part of a quietly expanding American policy of third-country deportation now spanning at least thirty-five nations. Jamaica, which signed its agreement in June, framed its role as a temporary waystation, yet the deal was never debated publicly, and the deportees' destinations remain undisclosed. The episode illuminates something older and darker in the human story: the use of geography as punishment, and of uncertainty as a tool of power.
On a Tuesday in October, twenty-two people stepped off a plane in Kingston, Jamaica — deported from the United States, not to their home countries, but to a nation many of them had likely never lived in. Within hours they were on a bus, bound for a location no official would name. It was the first visible moment of a much larger system.
Jamaica had signed on in June, agreeing to receive US deportees and transfer them onward to wherever the US deemed appropriate. The government pledged to accept no one with a criminal record, and the International Organization for Migration — a UN body — would cover all costs. Officials described Jamaica's role as a transit point, nothing more. But the arrival of those twenty-two people cracked open a question that had been sitting quietly beneath the arrangement: why had Jamaicans never been told?
Opposition spokesperson Fitz Jackson asked aloud what most of the country seemed not to know, warning that citizens were being asked to trust a secret document touching their security and communities. Foreign Minister Kamina Johnson Smith pushed back, explaining that Washington had simply refused to allow the agreement to be published. The secrecy, she said, was not Jamaica's choice.
What Jamaica joined is part of something far larger. At least thirty-five countries have now signed similar agreements with the United States, and the Trump administration has allocated roughly four hundred and ten million dollars to support operations it describes as the largest mass deportation campaign in American history. Human rights organizations have spent months challenging these removals in court, arguing that people are being expelled without due process — some sent to conflict zones, others routed through third countries specifically to circumvent court orders that forbid returning them to dangerous homelands.
A US official, quoted anonymously in a Senate report, offered a candid summary of the logic: the point, the official said, is to threaten people with being dropped in the middle of nowhere. The point is to scare people. Fear, not logistics, is the policy. Twenty-two people arrived in Jamaica. Twenty-two people disappeared into an undisclosed location. The agreement remains secret, and the machinery keeps moving.
On a Tuesday in October, twenty-two people stepped off a plane at Norman Manley International Airport in Kingston, Jamaica. They had been deported from the United States. Within hours, they were loaded onto a bus and driven to a location nobody would publicly name. This was the first visible piece of a much larger machinery—one that the Trump administration has been building across the globe, moving deportees not to their home countries but to third nations, often ones they have never set foot in before.
Jamaica signed on to this arrangement in June, agreeing to accept people the US wanted to remove, then transfer them onward to wherever they actually belonged or wherever the US deemed appropriate. The government was clear about one thing: it would not take anyone with a criminal record. The International Organization for Migration, a UN body, would handle the logistics and pay for the care. Jamaica itself would spend no money. In a joint statement from the Ministry of National Security and Peace and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Foreign Trade, officials framed this as a transit point, nothing more—a way station for people passing through.
But the arrival of those twenty-two deportees cracked open a question that had been sitting quietly beneath the agreement: Why had Jamaica never debated this deal in public? Opposition leaders, particularly Fitz Jackson, the national security spokesperson, began asking aloud what most Jamaicans seemed not to know. "Jamaicans are being asked to trust a secret document that touches their security, their communities and their public services," Jackson said. The foreign minister, Kamina Johnson Smith, pushed back on social media, noting that the US partner—meaning the Trump administration—had simply refused to allow the agreement to be made public. Some countries had agreed to accept criminals and had published their deals openly. Jamaica had done neither. The US, she said, had drawn the line.
What Jamaica had joined was part of something far larger. At least thirty-five countries have now signed third-country deportation agreements with the United States. The Trump administration has allocated roughly four hundred and ten million dollars to support these operations. The scale is staggering, and it sits at the center of what the administration calls the largest mass deportation campaign in American history. Yet the mechanics of it remain largely opaque—not just to Jamaicans, but to the American public and to the people being deported.
Human rights organizations and immigration advocates have spent months challenging these deportations in US courts, arguing that they violate fundamental constitutional protections. People are being removed from the country without due process, without a fair hearing, without the chance to contest the decision. Some are being sent to countries wracked by conflict or known for systematic human rights abuses—South Sudan, for instance, where violence is ongoing. Others are being sent to third countries as a way around court protection orders that explicitly forbid the US from returning them to their home nations because of the danger they would face there. By routing them through a third country first, critics argue, the administration sidesteps those legal barriers, even though some third countries then send the deportees back to the very places the US courts said they could not go.
In a February report, Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee included an anonymous quote from a US official that laid bare the intent. "The point is that the administration can threaten people that they will literally be dropped in the middle of nowhere," the official said. "The point is to scare people." This was not about logistics or burden-sharing or finding the most efficient way to remove someone from US territory. It was about fear as policy.
Jamaica's acceptance of the first flight signals that the system is working as designed. Twenty-two people arrived. Twenty-two people disappeared into an undisclosed location. The agreement remains secret. The legal challenges continue in American courts, but for now, the machinery keeps moving.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
Jamaicans are being asked to trust a secret document that touches their security, their communities and their public services.— Fitz Jackson, opposition national security spokesperson
The point is that the administration can threaten people that they will literally be dropped in the middle of nowhere. The point is to scare people.— Anonymous US official, cited in February Senate Foreign Relations Committee report
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte?
Das Original lesen bei Al Jazeera ↗
Politics & Governance