Israel's election has left Benjamin Netanyahu's far-right coalition without its mandate and handed the opposition a firm majority, yet that majority may not become a government. Most Jewish opposition parties have bound themselves against governing with Palestinian-led parties, a self-imposed limit that critics call racist and that could let Netanyahu linger as caretaker or force yet another vote. Beneath the arithmetic lies an old question about what kind of state Israel means to be, Jewish and democratic at once, and whether those two words can still be held together.
Israel's choice: Netanyahu's survival or a Palestinian-backed coalition after a contested election
"Netanyahu lost. I know how to count."
Netanyahu lost seats and his coalition lost its mandate. Why is he still in the conversation?
Because the opposition has a majority on paper, but most of its Jewish parties said they won't govern with Palestinian-led parties. That gap is what he can use to stay on as caretaker, or force another election.
Worth saying that this is the Guardian's analysis, and it calls the barrier confected. The ban itself is real, but whether it holds is not known yet.
The headlines seemed to treat it as settled.
Israel Hayom said "No Clear Government" and Channel 12 spoke of a path to a unity government. Yair Golan pushed back, saying he knows how to count.
Those are competing framings, not results. The final tally was still pending when this was written.
Do opposition voters share their leaders' reluctance?
Eran Halperin says a survey taken as polls closed showed a clear majority of opposition voters favoured working with Ra'am. The leaders were silent on Wednesday.
That's one researcher citing one survey. We don't have its size or method here, so I'd treat it as a signal rather than a measurement.
And Eisenkot?
He hasn't ruled it out directly, but his conditions make it politically impossible for Palestinian parties to join.
That's the reporting's characterisation of his conditions. The source doesn't spell out what they are, so we can't judge it ourselves.
Der Puls
- The opposition holds a clear majority in the Knesset, but the path to forming a government is blocked by its own refusal to work with Palestinian-led parties.
- Netanyahu claims vindication despite losing about ten seats, and his campaign framed Palestinian citizens as an enemy within the state.
- Opposition voters reportedly favour a government with Ra'am to unseat him, while their leaders stay silent and set conditions that keep Palestinian parties out.
- Palestinian parties say they are ready to help oust Netanyahu, and the coalition talks now beginning will determine whether the ban holds or a new election looms.
Israel's election has left Benjamin Netanyahu's far-right coalition without its mandate and handed the opposition a firm majority, yet that majority may not become a government. Most Jewish opposition parties have bound themselves against governing with Palestinian-led parties, a self-imposed limit that critics call racist and that could let Netanyahu linger as caretaker or force yet another vote. Beneath the arithmetic lies an old question about what kind of state Israel means to be, Jewish and democratic at once, and whether those two words can still be held together.
Hours before the final results were in, the shape of the outcome was already clear. Netanyahu's far-right coalition had lost its mandate, and the opposition held a solid majority. The harder question was whether that majority could ever become a government, because most of the Jewish opposition has ruled out governing with Palestinian-led parties. If that refusal holds, Netanyahu could turn defeat into a long caretaker stretch, or another election.
The campaign made Palestinian citizens, roughly a fifth of the population, the centre of its rhetoric. Netanyahu's posters read "The right or Palestine", and on election night he claimed the result as a mandate despite losing about ten seats. Opposition leader Yair Golan called the division between Jewish and Arab votes racist and urged a change government that includes Arab citizens. Polling reportedly showed many opposition voters wanted a government with Ra'am, yet their leaders remained quiet, caught between wanting Netanyahu gone and promises not to deal with Palestinians.
Palestinian leaders have been plainer. They say they are ready to help remove the government, and Ra'am has placed a former Jewish police chief second on its slate. For many Palestinian citizens, the vote carried personal weight, shaped by crime, discrimination, demolitions at home and the violence in the West Bank and Gaza. They turned out in record numbers.
The coming coalition talks will show whether the opposition's self-imposed ban survives. If it does, the Guardian's analysis suggests Israel's claim to be both Jewish and democratic will be forced into a stark choice.
Hours before the final results of Israel's election were in, the outline of the outcome was already visible. Benjamin Netanyahu's far-right coalition had lost its mandate, and the opposition held a firm majority. What was less clear was whether that majority could ever be turned into a government.
The obstacle is one the opposition has largely built for itself. Most of Israel's Jewish opposition ruled out governing with Palestinian-led parties, and they did so during a campaign in which Netanyahu cast Palestinian citizens as an enemy inside the state. If that ban holds, Netanyahu could convert a defeat into another term, or at least a prolonged stretch as caretaker prime minister, and possibly another round of elections.
That barrier became the focus of Israeli media and analysts. The newspaper Israel Hayom ran the headline "No Clear Government". Channel 12 published an article titled "Road to Unity Government Has Been Paved".
Yair Golan, leader of the centre-left Democrats, rejected that framing. "Netanyahu lost. I know how to count," he said in a statement calling for a government that includes Palestinians, who make up about 20% of Israel's population. He urged Israelis to stop accepting what he called Netanyahu's racist division between Jewish votes and Arab votes, and said the majority carried both a responsibility and an opportunity to form a change government in partnership with Arab citizens. The musician Yali Sobol put it more bluntly on Facebook: stop being racist, he wrote, and you will discover you have won.
The opposition's voters may be ahead of its leaders. Political psychology researcher Eran Halperin said a survey taken as polls closed showed a clear majority of opposition voters backed forming a government with the Palestinian-led Ra'am party to unseat Netanyahu. On Wednesday, though, opposition leaders were silent, apparently trying to reconcile their wish to remove him with their promises not to work with Palestinians. Gadi Eisenkot, a former general who leads the largest opposition party, has not ruled it out outright, but he has set conditions that make it politically impossible for Palestinian parties to join a coalition.
Palestinian leaders have been clearer. Yousef Jabareen, head of the larger Joint List, said they were ready to pave the way for ousting the Netanyahu government, adding that change comes through Jewish-Arab partnership. Ra'am, an Islamist party, placed a Jewish former police chief second on its slate as a signal of its commitment to working with Jewish Israelis. The objection that these parties are not Zionist is also uneven: some of the ultra-Orthodox groups central to Netanyahu's current coalition do not describe themselves as Zionist either. A precedent from three decades ago, when Yitzhak Rabin relied on Palestinian support for a minority government while pursuing a negotiated end to the conflict, gets little mention in today's debate.
Netanyahu placed racism at the centre of his campaign, a strategy critics said was meant both to lift his vote and to complicate the opposition's coalition-building afterward. A slogan on many of his posters read "The right or Palestine", framing a fifth of the population as an enemy within Israel's borders. On election night he shrugged off the loss of about 10 seats from the 64-seat coalition he assembled in 2022, a severe rebuke by most counts, and claimed vindication. The Knesset overall has moved further right, as have young Israelis. He declared that the right-wing bloc has a clear, decisive majority among the Zionist public and called for a strong national-right government, an open invitation to opponents to put their rejection of Palestinian parties ahead of their opposition to him.
Many Israelis described the vote as existential, as they struggled to halt the erosion of democracy inside the pre-1967 borders and to secure a State Commission of Inquiry into the 7 October attacks. For Palestinian citizens, who face surging crime, discrimination and home demolitions inside Israel while watching relatives and friends endure ethnic cleansing in the occupied West Bank and a war of annihilation in Gaza, that was viscerally true, and they turned out in record numbers.
Israel calls itself a Jewish and democratic state. If Palestinian representatives are effectively excluded from government because of their race, the Guardian's analysis argues, Netanyahu will have turned that promise into a choice between a Jewish future and a democratic one. The coalition talks now beginning will show whether the opposition's self-imposed ban holds.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
Netanyahu lost. I know how to count.— Yair Golan, leader of the Democrats
We are ready and prepared to pave the way for the ousting of the Netanyahu government. The change comes through Jewish-Arab partnership.— Yousef Jabareen, leader of the Joint List