In the slow, deliberate machinery of parliamentary democracy, Israel's president has placed the first chance at forming a government in the hands of Gadi Eisenkot, a former chief of the armed forces who has stood against Benjamin Netanyahu. The mandate, announced on November 7, 2026, opens a window of twenty-eight days in which he must gather enough lawmakers behind him, a period that may be stretched by fourteen more. Whether the country's leadership passes to a rival of the sitting prime minister, or returns to Netanyahu, now depends on arithmetic that has yet to be written.
Israeli President Taps Former General Gadi Eisenkot, a Netanyahu Rival, to Try Forming Government
In the slow, deliberate machinery of parliamentary democracy, Israel's president has placed the first chance at forming a government in the hands of Gadi Eisenkot, a former chief of the armed forces who has stood against Benjamin Netanyahu. The mandate, announced on November 7, 2026, opens a window of twenty-eight days in which he must gather enough lawmakers behind him, a period that may be stretched by fourteen more. Whether the country's leadership passes to a rival of the sitting prime minister, or returns to Netanyahu, now depends on arithmetic that has yet to be written.
Israel's president has handed the task of forming the next government to Gadi Eisenkot, a former military chief and a critic of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The mandate, reported on November 7, 2026, starts a clock of twenty-eight days in which he must assemble a coalition.
That window can be stretched by up to fourteen additional days, for a maximum of forty-two. The source does not say what would justify an extension or who would grant it.
Eisenkot comes to the task from the military rather than the premiership, and the choice places a Netanyahu rival in the position of winning enough lawmakers to govern. If he cannot, the chance will most likely pass to Netanyahu himself. The reporting does not say which parties Eisenkot might approach, how many seats he would need, or what prompted the president's decision. The next thing to watch is whether he can show coalition commitments before the days run out, and whether he asks for more time.
Israel's president has handed the task of forming the country's next government to Gadi Eisenkot, a former military chief and an opponent of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The mandate, reported on November 7, 2026, starts a clock: Eisenkot has 28 days to assemble a coalition.
That window can be stretched. The timeline allows an extension of up to 14 additional days, which would bring the maximum to 42 days if the extra time is granted. The source does not say what would justify an extension or who would grant it.
Eisenkot comes to the task from the military rather than from the premiership. He previously served as the head of the armed forces, and he is described as a critic of Netanyahu. The choice puts a Netanyahu rival, not the sitting prime minister, in the position of trying to win the backing of enough lawmakers to govern.
The fallback is already visible. If Eisenkot cannot build a coalition within his allotted time, Netanyahu is likely to get his own chance at forming a government. The word is likely, not certain, and the reporting stops short of describing the procedure in any more detail.
The material available is thin on the details a reader would most want: which parties Eisenkot might approach, how many seats a coalition would require, what prompted the president's choice, and what the political conditions are around the decision. None of that is spelled out here, and it would be a mistake to fill the gap with guesses.
What is established is the structure. One man opposed to the prime minister holds the first opportunity, with a four-week deadline and a possible two-week extension. If the effort fails, the opportunity most likely passes to Netanyahu. The next thing to watch is whether Eisenkot can show coalition commitments before his 28 days run out, and whether he asks for the extra time.
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte?
Das Original lesen bei The Washington Post ↗
Politics & Governance