Israeli Opposition Weighs Alliance With Ultra-Orthodox Parties in Bid to Oust Netanyahu

A coalition built to end one tenure must hold partners who split on military service.
The opposition's possible path to power runs through parties that disagree with Eisenkot's draft pledge.
Mark

So what is actually being reported here?

Mimi

That Israel's opposition is considering a deal with ultra-Orthodox parties to unseat Netanyahu, and that it would probably force Gadi Eisenkot to retreat from his promise of universal conscription.

Mark

Why does Eisenkot's pledge matter so much?

Mimi

He's a former military chief, so the draft pledge is tied to his identity as a candidate. Giving it up would cost him something real.

Luke

Let's be careful about the word "probably." That's the report's assessment of what a deal would require. It isn't a confirmed negotiating position.

Mark

Are talks happening?

Luke

The material doesn't say. It describes the opposition as weighing or exploring a deal, not as having started formal negotiations.

Mimi

Which is why the story is about a tension more than an event. Two goals pull against each other.

Mark

Which parties are involved?

Luke

Not named in what we have. Nor are any terms, or any response from Eisenkot. Those are open questions.

Mimi

So the thing to watch is whether the draft issue can be bridged, or simply set aside.

  • The opposition is weighing an unlikely alliance with ultra-Orthodox parties as a route to unseating Netanyahu.
  • A deal would collide head-on with Eisenkot's pledge to enforce universal military conscription, a stance tied to his military record.
  • Sources are working through whether the draft question can be softened or bridged without costing the opposition its credibility.
  • The idea remains under consideration; no formal terms, named parties, or announced talks have been reported yet.

In the long contest over who should govern Israel, the opposition has begun to contemplate a partnership that would have seemed improbable not long ago: an alliance with the ultra-Orthodox parties, united by a single aim of ending Benjamin Netanyahu's hold on power. The Washington Post, reporting on November 9, 2026, presents this as an idea under consideration rather than a settled course. Its central obstacle is a principle: former military chief Gadi Eisenkot has pledged to enforce universal conscription, a commitment that the religious parties, whose members would feel a universal draft most directly, would likely require him to set aside.

Israel's opposition is looking at a partnership that would have seemed unlikely not long ago: a coalition with the country's ultra-Orthodox Jewish parties, assembled for a single purpose of removing Benjamin Netanyahu from power.

The Washington Post, in a report published November 9, 2026, describes the idea as still under consideration. The central difficulty is that such a coalition would probably require Gadi Eisenkot, the former chief of the military, to step back from his pledge to enforce universal conscription. That pledge is part of what he brings to the opposition, and the ultra-Orthodox parties are the group a universal draft would touch most directly.

The available reporting is brief. It does not name the parties involved, lay out terms, or confirm that talks have begun, and it does not say how Eisenkot has responded. The word "probably" matters here: this is an assessment of what a deal would demand, not an announced agreement.

The question is still a real test. A coalition built to end Netanyahu's tenure would have to hold together partners who disagree sharply on military service, and Eisenkot would have to weigh his own credibility against the prize of governing. Whether the conscription issue can be bridged will show whether this idea becomes an actual alliance.

Israel's opposition is looking at a partnership that would have seemed unlikely not long ago: a coalition with the country's ultra-Orthodox Jewish parties, assembled for one purpose, removing Benjamin Netanyahu from power.

The Washington Post, in a report published November 9, 2026, describes the idea as under consideration rather than settled. What the available reporting does establish is the central difficulty. Building such a coalition would probably require Gadi Eisenkot, the former chief of the military, to back away from a pledge he has made to enforce universal military conscription.

Eisenkot's position carries weight because of who he is. He led the armed forces before entering politics, and his commitment to a draft that applies to everyone is part of what he brings to the opposition's case. The ultra-Orthodox parties are the group a universal draft would affect most directly, which is why the pledge and the coalition arithmetic collide.

That collision is the heart of the story. The opposition's route to a governing majority may run through religious parties, and those parties' participation would likely depend on softening or abandoning the conscription promise. Dropping it would mean Eisenkot retreating from a stated principle in exchange for the votes needed to unseat the prime minister.

The reporting available here is brief. It does not name the specific ultra-Orthodox parties involved, set out what terms are on the table, or say whether any formal talks have begun. It also does not say how Eisenkot or his allies have responded to the prospect of changing course. The word "probably" in the central claim matters: this is an assessment of what a deal would demand, not an announced agreement.

What can be said is that the question is a real test for the opposition. A coalition built to end Netanyahu's tenure would have to hold together partners who disagree sharply on military service, and the former general at the center of the effort would have to weigh the cost to his own credibility against the prize of governing.

The thing to watch is whether the conscription issue can be bridged at all. It is central to ultra-Orthodox participation and to the opposition's standing, and how it is resolved, or avoided, will show whether this idea becomes an actual alliance.

Building a coalition with religious parties will probably require Eisenkot to backtrack on his pledge to enforce universal military conscription (paraphrased).
— The Washington Post reporting
Contattaci Domande frequenti