At the Venice Film Festival, an Israeli documentary called NAZA has drawn a 25-minute standing ovation for its unflinching account of how artificial intelligence was used to select assassination targets in Gaza at industrial scale. Made by the same filmmakers who won an Academy Award for No Other Land, the film gathers testimony from Israeli military and intelligence insiders who describe civilian deaths not as the fog of war, but as deliberate and calculated outcomes. In an era when technology increasingly mediates the distance between decision and consequence, NAZA asks its audience — and th
Israeli documentary on AI-assisted Gaza targeting receives 25-minute ovation at Venice
It was done on a mass scale, like a factory
So this film is based on interviews with Israeli military people who were actually involved in the targeting. How did the filmmakers get them to talk?
They promised anonymity. Voices and faces were digitally altered, and they filmed many of them at night on rooftops in Tel Aviv. It took nearly three years to build those relationships and conduct the interviews.
But we should note—these are one-sided accounts. We're hearing from Israeli sources who chose to speak. We don't have the military's official response or counter-narrative in the film itself.
The film calls the system Lavender. What exactly did it do?
It used monitored phone networks in Gaza—calls, movements, social connections—to identify people for targeting. One person interviewed describes it as industrial scale, like a factory operation.
That's what the interviewees say it did. We should be careful about treating their description as the complete technical picture. The film documents their testimony about how they understood the system to work.
One of the people in the film says it felt like a video game and was "insanely fun." That's a direct quote?
Yes, that's what someone involved in targeting said on camera. It's jarring to read, and it was clearly jarring to the audience at Venice too.
It's one person's characterization. We don't know if that reflects a broader attitude among operators or if it was an outlier. The film captures it; we should report what was said without overgeneralizing.
The directors say the killing was premeditated and intentional, not accidental. Is that their conclusion or the sources'?
It's their conclusion, based on what the sources told them. The military people they interviewed acknowledged knowing families were in the homes being targeted. That's the evidence they're pointing to.
Right—and that's a significant claim. It hinges on whether those sources are credible, whether they understood what they were saying, and whether their accounts are representative. The film makes a case; it doesn't prove it beyond dispute.
The standing ovation was 25 minutes. Does that mean the film will win an award?
It's in competition, but ovations don't determine winners. Last year's The Voice of Hind Rajab got a 23-minute ovation and won second prize, not first. The jury decides.
And we should note that Venice audiences and juries can be moved by films that make strong political statements. That doesn't tell us whether the film's claims will hold up to scrutiny or how other audiences will receive it.
Le Pouls
- An AI system called Lavender processed Gaza's phone networks to generate assassination lists on a mass scale, with one operator describing the work as feeling 'like a video game' — a chilling casualness at the heart of a documented killing apparatus.
- Israeli military and intelligence sources, speaking anonymously from Tel Aviv rooftops, testify that strikes on family homes were carried out with full knowledge of who was inside, framing civilian death not as collateral but as intentional.
- Gaza's Ministry of Health records approximately 73,500 Palestinians killed and 174,500 wounded since October 2023, figures that the film places in direct relationship to the targeting decisions its subjects describe on camera.
- With foreign journalists largely barred from Gaza, NAZA becomes one of the only available windows into how these decisions were made — its Venice premiere transforming a film festival into a rare site of accountability.
- The film's directors, backed by The Guardian and executive producer Jonathan Glazer, are explicitly calling for Western sanctions against Israel, arguing that external pressure is the last lever available to those inside Israel and Palestine still fighting for human rights.
- A 25-minute standing ovation at Venice — following last year's 23-minute response to The Voice of Hind Rajab — suggests the festival has become a recurring stage for Palestinian witness, and that NAZA's reach will extend far beyond the Lido.
At the Venice Film Festival, an Israeli documentary called NAZA has drawn a 25-minute standing ovation for its unflinching account of how artificial intelligence was used to select assassination targets in Gaza at industrial scale. Made by the same filmmakers who won an Academy Award for No Other Land, the film gathers testimony from Israeli military and intelligence insiders who describe civilian deaths not as the fog of war, but as deliberate and calculated outcomes. In an era when technology increasingly mediates the distance between decision and consequence, NAZA asks its audience — and the governments that arm and fund such systems — to reckon with what it means to know, and to continue.
At this year's Venice Film Festival, an 80-minute documentary titled NAZA received a 25-minute standing ovation after its premiere — a response that transformed a screening into something closer to a reckoning. The film takes its name from a Hebrew military term referring to estimated civilian deaths in a single airstrike, and it was made by Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor, the Israeli filmmakers behind last year's Academy Award-winning No Other Land.
For nearly three years, Abraham and Szor conducted interviews with Israeli military officers and intelligence analysts willing to speak only under strict anonymity. Filmed at night on Tel Aviv rooftops with digitally altered voices and faces, these sources describe in detail the workings of an AI targeting system called Lavender — a program that drew on Gaza's monitored telecommunications to identify people for assassination. One source calls it industrial in scale. Another, who participated directly in the targeting process, compares the experience to remote work, describing it as 'like a video game' and 'insanely fun.'
What the testimony collectively reveals, according to the filmmakers, is not the chaos of war but its opposite: deliberate, premeditated harm. Sources acknowledge knowing that the homes marked for strikes contained families. Some describe a pervasive atmosphere of hatred toward Palestinians. In a statement published in +972 Magazine, Abraham and Szor wrote that the killing of Palestinian civilians was 'not a tragic byproduct of a war against Hamas, but a premeditated, calculated, and intentional act.'
The numbers behind these decisions are staggering. Gaza's Ministry of Health records approximately 73,500 Palestinians killed and 174,500 wounded since October 2023. With foreign journalists largely barred from entering Gaza, films like NAZA represent one of the few available accounts of how targeting choices were made and rationalized by those who made them.
The film arrives with considerable institutional weight behind it. Produced in partnership with The Guardian and executive-produced by Jonathan Glazer — whose The Zone of Interest won the 2024 Oscar for best international feature — NAZA is the only documentary in competition at Venice this year. Its reception echoes last year's festival, when The Voice of Hind Rajab drew a 23-minute ovation and took second prize. Abraham has said plainly that he hopes the film will move Western governments toward sanctions against Israel, arguing that those inside Israel and Palestine still working for change need external pressure to amplify their voices.
At the Venice Film Festival this week, an 80-minute documentary about how Israel used artificial intelligence to select and strike targets in Gaza drew a standing ovation that lasted 25 minutes. The film, titled NAZA—a Hebrew military term for the estimated civilian death toll in a single airstrike—premiered to an audience that included industry professionals, journalists, and festival attendees who remained on their feet as the credits rolled.
The directors are Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor, Israeli filmmakers who won an Academy Award last year for No Other Land, a documentary about Israeli settler violence in the occupied West Bank made alongside Palestinian co-directors Basel Adra and Hamdan Ballal. For NAZA, they spent nearly three years conducting interviews with Israeli military officers and intelligence analysts who agreed to speak only if their identities were protected. The filmmakers digitally altered their voices and faces, and filmed many of them at night on rooftops in Tel Aviv.
The film's central subject is an AI-assisted targeting system called Lavender. According to the testimony captured on screen, Lavender drew on Gaza's monitored phone networks—tracking calls, movements, and social connections—to identify people for assassination. One person interviewed describes the operation as industrial in scale: "It was done on a mass scale, like a factory." Another, involved in the targeting process itself, compares it to remote work with a disturbing casualness, saying the job felt "like a video game" and was "insanely fun."
What emerges from these accounts is a portrait of deliberate harm. The military sources acknowledge that they knew the homes they were marking for strikes contained families. Some speak of a pervasive atmosphere of hatred toward Palestinians. In a written statement published in +972 Magazine, Abraham and Szor concluded that the killing of Palestinian civilians "was not a 'tragic byproduct' of a war against Hamas… but a premeditated, calculated, and intentional act."
The scale of death is staggering. According to Gaza's Ministry of Health, approximately 73,500 Palestinians have been killed and 174,500 wounded since October 2023. Foreign journalists have been largely barred from entering Gaza to independently verify conditions on the ground, making documentaries like this one a rare window into how the targeting decisions were made and justified by those who made them.
The film's reception at Venice signals its reach. Trade publications covering the film industry called it an "urgent, gut-punch" and noted it provoked "outrage" and "disgust" at what it documents about the current Israeli government. NAZA is the only documentary in competition at this year's festival, which concludes on Saturday. It follows last year's The Voice of Hind Rajab, which received a 23-minute standing ovation and won the festival's second-place prize.
Abraham told the AFP news agency that his goal was straightforward: to let the people who built and operated these systems describe their work in detail. He said he hopes the film will move Western governments to withdraw their support for Israel through sanctions. "Those of us inside Israel and Palestine trying to fight for change need it," he said, arguing that Western inaction weakens the voices within Israel calling for human rights and political solutions.
The film was produced by Jim Wilson, a UK-based producer, in partnership with The Guardian. Jonathan Glazer served as executive producer—the same team behind The Zone of Interest, which won the 2024 Oscar for best international feature. That pedigree, combined with the Venice premiere and the audience response, suggests NAZA will reach far beyond the festival circuit.
Citations marquantes
We wanted to hear, in as much detail as possible, how the systems of killing in Gaza looked, how they operated— Director Yuval Abraham to AFP
The killing of Palestinian civilians in Gaza was not a tragic byproduct of a war against Hamas but a premeditated, calculated, and intentional act— Directors Abraham and Szor, writing in +972 Magazine