Israel has ordered its military to prepare more intensely for a possible strike on Iran, a step that stops short of any decision to attack but raises the temperature of a long standoff. In Tehran, the commander of the Revolutionary Guards has declared that missile development will continue regardless of sanctions and threats, while the parliament speaker insists that Washington must now answer Iran's latest proposal. Both capitals are signaling resolve, and what remains open is whether the diplomatic channel or the military preparations will shape what comes next.
Israel Readies Possible Strike on Iran as IRGC Chief Vows Missile Programme Will Continue
Two tracks moving at once: negotiators trading proposals, and militaries preparing
Mark
Start with the headline fact. What exactly has Israel done?
Mimi
It has ordered its military to step up preparations for a possible attack on Iran. Preparations, not an attack.
Luke
And that distinction matters. The report doesn't say who gave the order, what the target set is, or whether a strike is likely. Anything beyond 'stepped-up planning' is inference.
Mark
Then there's the IRGC chief's statement on missiles.
Mimi
He said development will continue despite threats and sanctions. It's a signal that missiles are off the table in any bargaining.
Luke
Though we're reading that from a short summary. We don't have his full words, or the setting he said them in.
Mark
And Ghalibaf?
Mimi
He's parliament speaker and Tehran's lead negotiator. He told Al Jazeera that Washington must make and announce a decision on Iran's latest proposal.
Mark
What was rejected?
Mimi
A US proposal to move Iran's 60 percent enriched uranium stockpile to a third country.
Luke
Worth noting we don't know what Iran's own proposal contains. So we can't judge how far apart the two sides really are.
Mark
So is the Israeli order connected to the talks?
Luke
Nothing in the report says so. It's tempting to link them, but the link isn't established.
O Pulso
- Israel has ordered its armed forces to step up readiness for a possible attack on Iran, and the order alone sends a chill through an already fragile region.
- The Revolutionary Guards chief has flatly vowed that missile development will go on, refusing to bargain away a programme that sanctions have long targeted.
- Tehran has rejected a US plan to ship its 60 percent enriched uranium abroad, leaving the nuclear file stuck on a hard refusal.
- Parliament Speaker Ghalibaf has put the ball squarely in Washington's court, demanding a public decision on Iran's newest proposal.
- Two tracks are running at once, talks on one side and military preparation on the other, and no timeline shows which will win out.
Israel has ordered its military to prepare more intensely for a possible strike on Iran, a step that stops short of any decision to attack but raises the temperature of a long standoff. In Tehran, the commander of the Revolutionary Guards has declared that missile development will continue regardless of sanctions and threats, while the parliament speaker insists that Washington must now answer Iran's latest proposal. Both capitals are signaling resolve, and what remains open is whether the diplomatic channel or the military preparations will shape what comes next.
Israel has told its military to step up preparations for a possible attack on Iran. The order is an intensification of planning rather than a decision to strike, and the report does not say what form an attack might take, what would trigger it, or who gave the instruction. It establishes only that readiness has been raised.
From Tehran came two firm statements. The head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps said missile development will continue despite threats and sanctions, a refusal to trade away a programme that has long been targeted. Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Iran's lead negotiator, told Al Jazeera that Washington must make and announce a decision on Iran's latest proposal, placing the burden of response on the United States.
That proposal comes after Tehran rejected a US plan to move its stockpile of uranium enriched to 60 percent to a third country. The terms of Iran's new offer are not spelled out in the report.
The pieces describe two tracks moving together: negotiators trading proposals, and Israel readying its forces while Iran insists its missile work is not negotiable. Whether the Israeli order is meant to pressure the talks is not stated. What to watch is whether Washington publicly answers Ghalibaf and whether Israeli preparations move beyond planning. No timeline is given for either.
Israel has told its military to step up preparations for a possible attack on Iran. That is the central fact in a report published by Al Jazeera on November 12, 2026, and it arrives alongside two statements from Tehran that point in a different direction: a vow to keep building missiles, and a demand that Washington give an answer.
The order to the Israeli military is described as an intensification of preparations, not a decision to strike. The source does not say what form an attack might take, what would trigger it, or who inside the Israeli government gave the instruction. It establishes that planning has been ordered up a notch, and nothing beyond that.
From the Iranian side, the head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps said the country's missile development will go on despite threats and sanctions. The statement is a refusal to trade away a programme that sanctions and military warnings have long targeted. The report does not name the commander or say where or when he spoke.
The diplomatic thread runs through Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Iran's parliament speaker and its lead negotiator. He told Al Jazeera that Washington must make and announce a decision on Iran's latest proposal. The wording puts the burden on the United States to respond, rather than on Tehran to offer more.
That proposal follows a rejection. Tehran turned down a US proposal to transfer Iran's stockpile of uranium enriched to 60 percent to a third country. The report does not spell out the terms of Iran's new offer, so what Ghalibaf wants Washington to accept or refuse is not described in the material available.
Taken together, the pieces describe two tracks moving at once. On one, negotiators are trading proposals, with Iran declining to ship out its highly enriched material. On the other, Israel is readying its forces and Iran's military leadership is saying its missile work is not up for discussion. The report does not say whether the tracks are connected, or whether the Israeli order is meant as pressure on the talks.
What to watch next is whether Washington answers Ghalibaf's demand with a public decision, and whether the Israeli preparations move beyond planning. The report offers no timeline for either.
Citações Notáveis
Washington must make and announce a decision on Iran's latest proposal.— Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Iranian Parliament Speaker, to Al Jazeera
Quer a matéria completa?
Leia o original em Al Jazeera ↗