Three years after the deadliest day in Israel's modern history, a nation paused at 6:29 in the morning to hold its grief — and then turned, as nations often must, toward the harder question of how such a catastrophe was allowed to happen. With over 1,200 killed, 251 taken hostage, and more than 73,000 Palestinians dead in the war that followed, the anniversary of the October 7 Hamas attack has become inseparable from a demand for accountability that no official ceremony can contain. Weeks before a national election, Israel finds itself suspended between mourning and reckoning, between the sole
Israel Marks Three Years Since October 7 With Memorials, Protests and Calls for Accountability
Three years of a basic demand for accountability.
What does it mean that there are 400 memorial events but the government still hasn't appointed a commission of inquiry?
It means the country is grieving in fragments. Families and survivors are organizing their own remembrance, their own search for answers, while the official machinery has stalled.
But we should be clear: Netanyahu has resisted the commission. That's different from saying no investigation exists at all. Has there been any other formal inquiry?
Not a state commission—which is what they're demanding. It's the most powerful tool available under Israeli law.
Why does Eisenkot, who lost his own son, have standing to challenge Netanyahu on this?
Because he's been inside the system. He knows what questions should have been asked and weren't. His loss gives him credibility, but also moral authority to say the government failed.
The source says Netanyahu claimed Israel killed "4,000 out of 6,000" militants. Do we know if that's verified, or is that his statement?
That's Netanyahu's claim at a cabinet meeting. The source doesn't provide independent verification.
And the warnings from the UAE and Egypt—are those confirmed?
The source says "reports have alleged." So it's reported, not confirmed. That's an important distinction.
Which is exactly why families want a commission. They want the full picture, not fragments from media reports.
What happens if Netanyahu wins the election?
The source doesn't address that. But the timing—three weeks between the anniversary and the vote—suggests accountability will remain a campaign issue regardless.
El Pulso
- Survivors and bereaved families are no longer waiting for the state to lead — they organized Wednesday's largest memorial events themselves, through grassroots movements like Kumu and the October Council, bypassing official channels to demand answers.
- The central unresolved wound is Netanyahu's three-year refusal to authorize a state commission of inquiry, the most powerful investigative tool in Israeli law, leaving the failures of October 7 officially unexamined.
- With elections just twenty days away, accountability has hardened into a campaign weapon — Netanyahu's rivals, including Gadi Eisenkot, who lost his own son in the war, are using the anniversary to press the charge that the government has been running from the truth.
- Reports that Israel received advance warnings from the UAE and Egypt before the attack have deepened public anger, raising the question of not just what failed, but what was known and ignored.
- The country is landing in a fractured place — unified in grief at the moment of silence, divided in the hours that follow between official ceremony and grassroots protest, between a government invoking memory and a public demanding judgment.
Three years after the deadliest day in Israel's modern history, a nation paused at 6:29 in the morning to hold its grief — and then turned, as nations often must, toward the harder question of how such a catastrophe was allowed to happen. With over 1,200 killed, 251 taken hostage, and more than 73,000 Palestinians dead in the war that followed, the anniversary of the October 7 Hamas attack has become inseparable from a demand for accountability that no official ceremony can contain. Weeks before a national election, Israel finds itself suspended between mourning and reckoning, between the solemnity of remembrance and the urgency of truth.
At 6:29 on the morning of October 7, 2023, Hamas-led gunmen crossed into Israeli communities along the Gaza border and killed more than 1,200 people — children, families, the elderly — in the deadliest single day in the country's history. Two hundred and fifty-one others were taken hostage into Gaza. Three years later, Israel paused at that same moment for a national silence, then moved through the day with over 400 memorial events across the country.
The commemoration unfolded in two registers at once. Official state ceremonies marked the occasion, with Netanyahu invoking the Jewish holiday of Simchat Torah on which the attack fell. But the day's most significant gatherings were organized not by the government but by survivors and victims' families themselves — through movements like Kumu and the October Council. At the Nova festival site in Re'im Forest, where more than 370 people were murdered, crowds gathered to remember. That evening in Tel Aviv, tens of thousands were expected at a ceremony hosted by former hostage Eli Sharabi.
Beneath the mourning ran a current of political fury. Shir Mathias, whose parents were killed at Kibbutz Holit, called publicly for a change in leadership. Einav Zangauker, mother of a freed hostage and one of the government's most persistent critics, framed the anniversary as 'three years of a basic demand for accountability.' That demand centers on a state commission of inquiry — the most powerful investigative mechanism in Israeli law — which Netanyahu has resisted authorizing for the entirety of those three years.
The stakes are sharpened by elections scheduled for October 27. Netanyahu's main challenger, Gadi Eisenkot — who lost his own son in the war — has accused the prime minister of deliberately evading the truth about October 7's failures. Reports that Israel received preliminary warnings from the UAE and Egypt before the attack have added weight to those accusations. Since the war began, more than 73,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza.
The anniversary revealed a country caught between ceremony and demand — grieving together at 6:29 in the morning, then dividing again in the hours that followed over the question that three years have not answered: who knew what, who decided what, and who must answer for it.
At 6:29 in the morning on October 7, 2023, Hamas-led gunmen crossed into Israeli communities along the Gaza border and killed more than 1,200 people in what became the deadliest single day in the country's history. They took 251 others hostage into Gaza. Among the dead were children, entire families, elderly residents—the scale of loss was total and immediate. Three years later, on the exact anniversary, Israel paused at that same moment for a national silence, then moved through the day with over 400 memorial events scattered across the country.
The commemoration unfolded in layers. At noon, bereaved families and grassroots protest groups held a national minute of reflection, joined by hospitals, municipalities, universities, and businesses. At the Nova festival site in the Re'im Forest, where more than 370 people had been murdered and 44 abducted, people gathered to remember. Throughout the day, protest convoys and displays moved through Israeli towns. That evening in Tel Aviv, tens of thousands were expected at a national memorial ceremony organized by the Kumu movement, which represents survivors and victims' families, and hosted by former hostage Eli Sharabi and actress Shani Cohen.
But the anniversary was not only about remembrance. It became a focal point for a deeper political reckoning. Shir Mathias, whose parents were killed during the attack on Kibbutz Holit, wrote on social media calling for a change in leadership. "Everyone who had their hand on the wheel, those in uniforms and suits alike—must go home," she wrote. Einav Zangauker, mother of freed hostage Matan Zangauker and one of the government's most vocal critics, framed the moment differently: "Three years since the day that changed my life and our lives as a people. Three years of loss and pain. Three years of a basic demand for accountability."
That demand—for a state commission of inquiry—has become the central unresolved question. A state commission is the most powerful investigative mechanism in Israeli law, empowered to examine national-level disasters and the decisions that preceded them. For three years, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has resisted calls for such an inquiry and has not appointed any other special investigation into the failures of October 7. At a cabinet meeting, Netanyahu said Israel had killed "4,000 out of 6,000" militants who infiltrated that day. "We will reach all of them," he said, as Israeli strikes continued in Gaza. Since the war began, more than 73,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health.
The timing of the anniversary sharpens the political stakes. Elections are scheduled for October 27—less than three weeks away—and accountability has become a central campaign issue. Netanyahu's main challenger, Gadi Eisenkot, who lost his own son in the war, has called the government's response "a very deep failure" and accused Netanyahu of dodging the truth. "Netanyahu knows better than anyone why he is running from the truth, why he wants to bury the truth," Eisenkot said at a recent conference. On the anniversary itself, both Eisenkot and former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, another Netanyahu rival, spent the day visiting Israeli communities along the Gaza border.
The commemoration revealed a country divided between official ceremony and grassroots demand. The state held its formal memorials on Monday, with Netanyahu invoking the Jewish holiday—Simchat Torah—on which the attack occurred. But most of Wednesday's events were organized by survivors and victims themselves, through groups like the October Council and Kumu. These groups have become the voice pressing for investigation, for answers about what warnings were missed, what decisions were made, and who should answer for them. Reports have alleged that Israel received preliminary warnings from the United Arab Emirates and Egypt ahead of the attack, adding another layer to the accountability question. The anniversary, then, was not simply a day of mourning. It was a moment when a nation's grief collided with its demand to know what happened and why.
Citas Notables
Everyone who had their hand on the wheel, those in uniforms and suits alike—must go home.— Shir Mathias, whose parents were killed on October 7
Three years of loss and pain. Three years of a basic demand for accountability.— Einav Zangauker, mother of freed hostage Matan Zangauker