On a quiet stretch of road outside Hebron, a brief exchange of gunfire left two Israeli soldiers dead and turned an ordinary checkpoint into a flashpoint in a conflict that has long asked whether punishment can ever stand in for justice. Within hours, Israeli leaders had promised sieges, mass demolitions and the emptying of whole neighbourhoods, echoing the devastation seen in Gaza and Jenin and recalling the displacement of 1967. A court has paused the first demolition, but the larger question hangs in the air: whether a state answers grief by punishing the many for the acts of a few, in the
Israel Launches Collective Punishment Campaign in Hebron After Soldiers Killed
The Jenin refugee camp model arrives in Hebron.
Start with the bulldozer. Why does that image matter so much?
Because it happened within hours, with the finance minister filming it. And the house wasn't tied to the attackers. He said it was built without permits and meant to create deterrence.
Worth being precise there: the source says no connection was claimed between the owners and the attackers. That's not the same as proving none exists, but nobody asserted one.
And then the court stepped in.
A temporary order, after lawyer Mohammed Dahleh petitioned for two factory owners nearby. He argued it violated international law and Israeli administrative law.
Temporary is the key word. We don't know what the court will finally decide.
Katz invoked Jenin and Gaza. How seriously should we take that?
He said every clan neighbourhood the attackers came from would be evacuated. In Jenin, nearly 20,000 people have been forced out. Hebron has about 250,000 residents.
These are announcements. The reporting confirms one demolition began, not mass evictions. And Netanyahu's big operation has no date.
What about the election?
Voting is Tuesday, and polls suggest the coalition may lose its majority. Ministers came straight from campaigning.
The timing is notable, but the source doesn't say motive. That link is context, not established cause.
El Pulso
- Two soldiers are dead and three wounded after a 20-minute gunfight at a checkpoint outside Hebron, and the shockwaves are already moving through the city.
- Netanyahu and Defence Minister Katz have vowed sieges, mass home demolitions and forced eviction of entire neighbourhoods, drawing direct comparisons to Jenin and Gaza.
- A demolition began within hours on a home with no link to the attackers, filmed and celebrated by Finance Minister Smotrich, before a high court order stopped it.
- Human rights lawyers call the measures collective punishment, while a planned West Bank operation of unprecedented scale awaits a date and polls loom on Tuesday.
- The fight is also over the truth itself: a veteran AFP photographer faces baseless accusations, and the court order, evictions in Hebron and Halhul, and the timing of the operation remain unresolved.
On a quiet stretch of road outside Hebron, a brief exchange of gunfire left two Israeli soldiers dead and turned an ordinary checkpoint into a flashpoint in a conflict that has long asked whether punishment can ever stand in for justice. Within hours, Israeli leaders had promised sieges, mass demolitions and the emptying of whole neighbourhoods, echoing the devastation seen in Gaza and Jenin and recalling the displacement of 1967. A court has paused the first demolition, but the larger question hangs in the air: whether a state answers grief by punishing the many for the acts of a few, in the shadow of an election that may decide who holds the power to act.
Within hours of a shooting at a temporary checkpoint outside Hebron, a bulldozer was tearing down a Palestinian home near the scene. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich stood before it with a camera and posted the video, saying the demolition would create deterrence and exact a price. No one had suggested the owners were connected to the attackers.
The shooting was brief and deadly. Two gunmen opened fire after soldiers stopped their car at the checkpoint. Two Israeli soldiers were killed and three wounded, and the attackers died after a gunfight of about twenty minutes. Prime Minister Netanyahu responded by announcing a siege on Hebron and neighbouring Halhul, promising that residents of the gunmen's neighbourhoods would be forced out and that mass demolitions would follow. He also spoke of a large West Bank operation with no date yet set. Defence Minister Katz went further, saying Hebron would receive the Jenin model and that clan neighbourhoods would be emptied, as in Gaza.
The courts acted quickly. A high court issued a temporary order halting the demolitions after a human rights lawyer filed an urgent petition, arguing the measures amounted to collective punishment under international and Israeli law. Michael Sfard called Smotrich's video a direct admission of that very thing. Meanwhile, the press became a target. Prominent Israelis spread baseless claims that the AFP photographer who witnessed the gunfight had ties to the attackers, and the Foreign Press Association called the accusations dangerous.
The moment is also political. Israel votes on Tuesday, and the far-right coalition faces polls predicting it will lose its majority. What remains to be seen is whether the court order holds, whether evictions begin in Hebron and Halhul, and whether the promised operation is given a date.
Within hours of a shooting at a temporary checkpoint outside Hebron, a bulldozer was tearing down a Palestinian home near the scene, and Israel's finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, was standing in front of it with a camera. He posted the video. The demolition of a house built without permits, he said, was meant to create deterrence and exact a price. Nobody claimed the building's owners had any connection to the attackers.
The shooting itself was brief and deadly. According to the Israeli military, two men armed with an assault rifle and a handgun, driving a car with Israeli number plates, opened fire after soldiers stopped them at the checkpoint. Two Israeli soldiers were killed and three were wounded. The gunmen died after a gunfight that lasted about 20 minutes. An AFP photographer, on his way to another assignment, saw two Palestinian men with a handgun and an automatic rifle trading fire with Israeli forces.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded by announcing a siege on Hebron and the neighbouring town of Halhul. He said residents of the neighbourhoods the gunmen came from would all be forced out, and he promised mass home demolitions. He also said plans had been drawn up for the largest military operation in the West Bank since 1967, the year Israel occupied the territory and about 300,000 Palestinians were forcibly displaced. No date was set, he said, but the operation was on the way. His statement also pledged to expand Israeli settlements.
Defence Minister Israel Katz made the comparison explicit. Hebron, he said, would get the Jenin refugee camp model, and every clan neighbourhood the attackers came from would be emptied of residents, as in Gaza and Lebanon. Nearly 20,000 people have been forced from their homes in Jenin. Hebron is the largest Palestinian city in the occupied West Bank, with about 250,000 residents. National security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir also travelled to Hebron on Friday, demanding the dismantling of the Palestinian Authority and new limits on Palestinian movement, already heavily restricted by checkpoints and roadblocks.
The courts moved quickly. Israel's high court issued a temporary order halting the demolitions after human rights lawyer Mohammed Dahleh filed an urgent petition for two nearby factory owners, arguing the demolition violated international law on collective punishment and Israeli administrative law. Dahleh described it as an attempt to copy Gaza's practices in the heart of the West Bank and to wipe out whole areas as was done in Gaza and the West Bank's refugee camps. Michael Sfard, a leading Israeli lawyer, called Smotrich's video a direct admission that the demolition was collective punishment, noting that deterrence has served as a justification for it since antiquity.
The attack also set off a fight over the press. Prominent Israelis, including a candidate for the far-right Amcha Yisrael party, shared conspiracy theories, with no basis, accusing the AFP photographer of links to the gunmen. The Foreign Press Association called the claims dangerous and defamatory, saying he is a longtime professional who documented what he saw as his duties required. A week earlier, settlers severely injured photographer Heidi Levine as she documented attacks on Palestinians trying to harvest olives, and Israel has denied entry to several European journalists and an academic.
The backdrop is a West Bank that has grown more violent since the Hamas-led attacks of 7 October 2023: faster settlement expansion, ethnic cleansing and attacks on Palestinians, with more than 1,100 killed by Israeli forces or settlers. Violence has risen further since the olive harvest began in late September, as settler militants try to block a crop of economic and cultural importance.
The timing is political. Israel votes on Tuesday, and the far-right coalition, which backs settlers politically and financially, faces polls suggesting it will lose its majority. Ministers who had been campaigning rushed to the shooting site. What to watch now is whether the court order holds, whether evictions begin in Hebron and Halhul, and whether the promised large operation gets a date.
Citas Notables
The Jenin refugee camp model arrives in Hebron. Every clan neighbourhood from which the terrorists emerged will be evacuated.— Israel Katz, Israeli defence minister
Smotrich's video was a direct admission that the demolitions were collective punishment.— Michael Sfard, Israeli lawyer