Ireland boycotts Eurovision for second year over Gaza conflict

Over 73,000 Palestinians reported killed in Gaza since October 2023; 1,369 killed and 4,627 wounded since ceasefire began October 11, 2025.
This isn't neutral, and we won't pretend it is
Ireland's decision reflects a broader argument that Eurovision can no longer claim political neutrality while hosting a nation engaged in armed conflict.
Mark

Why does a song contest matter enough for countries to walk away from it?

Mimi

Because Eurovision isn't really about the songs anymore. It's one of the few moments where nearly every European nation sits in the same room. When you boycott it, you're making a statement that you can't share that space with another country.

Luke

But the statement is specifically about Israel's participation, not about hosting. The EBU's new rule prevents conflict-affected states from hosting, but Israel can still compete. So what exactly changes if Ireland stays home?

Mimi

The visibility. If major broadcasters pull out, it weakens the event's legitimacy. It says: this isn't neutral, and we won't pretend it is.

Mark

Has the EBU's rule actually worked? Did it stop the problem?

Luke

Not really. The rule only applies to hosting. Israel can still compete. And the ceasefire in Gaza is holding in name only—1,369 Palestinians killed since October. So the underlying crisis hasn't changed.

Mimi

Which is why Ireland is boycotting again. The situation hasn't improved. If anything, it's worse.

Mark

What does the EBU want now?

Mimi

They want dialogue. They're hoping to bring countries back. But they're also trying to find another Dutch broadcaster to replace the one boycotting.

Luke

So they're losing participation but trying to minimize the damage. The question is whether more countries follow Ireland and the Netherlands, or whether this stays contained to a few.

Mark

What would it take for Ireland to come back?

Mimi

Probably a fundamental change in the situation on the ground. Either the conflict ends, or the EBU bars Israel from competing entirely.

Luke

And neither of those seems likely in the near term.

  • Ireland and the Netherlands have both confirmed they will skip Eurovision 2027 in Burgas, Bulgaria, extending boycotts that began in 2026 when five nations refused to compete alongside Israel.
  • Gaza's death toll — over 73,000 since October 2023, with more than 1,300 killed even after a ceasefire took effect — gives the boycotting broadcasters a stark moral foundation that is difficult to dismiss.
  • The European Broadcasting Union is scrambling to find a replacement Dutch broadcaster, while Eurovision's director publicly mourns Ireland's absence and holds the door open for future reconciliation.
  • New EBU rules now bar conflict-involved nations from hosting the contest, but stop short of excluding them from competing — a compromise that boycotting countries argue does not go nearly far enough.
  • What was once a beloved pan-European spectacle is increasingly becoming a referendum on neutrality itself, with organizers caught between preserving inclusivity and confronting the political weight of who is included.

For the second year running, Ireland has chosen silence over song, withdrawing from Eurovision 2027 alongside the Netherlands in protest of Israel's continued participation amid the devastating humanitarian toll in Gaza. The decision reflects a deepening conviction among some nations that cultural stages are not exempt from moral reckoning — that to perform alongside a country engaged in large-scale conflict is itself a form of statement. Eurovision, born as a postwar dream of unity through music, now finds itself a mirror for the fractures it was meant to transcend.

Ireland's national broadcaster RTÉ announced Thursday that the country will skip Eurovision for a second consecutive year, citing the "appalling and ongoing loss of lives in Gaza" and the humanitarian catastrophe there. The Netherlands, which made its own withdrawal announcement last month, stands alongside Ireland in protest of Israel's continued place in the competition. At least two of the five nations that boycotted the 2026 contest are now doubling down as the 2027 edition prepares to take shape on Bulgaria's Black Sea coast.

The moral weight behind the boycotts is considerable. Palestinian authorities report more than 73,000 deaths since Israel launched its military campaign following the Hamas-led attack of October 2023. Even a US-brokered ceasefire that took effect in October 2025 has not halted the violence — Gaza's health ministry records 1,369 killed and 4,627 wounded since that truce began. Dutch broadcaster Avrotros put it plainly: Eurovision can no longer be considered a neutral platform while one of its competing nations remains engaged in large-scale military conflict.

The European Broadcasting Union has attempted to respond to the pressure. It reduced individual viewer voting limits last year amid allegations of a coordinated Israeli public voting campaign, and recently introduced rules barring broadcasters from conflict-affected states from hosting the event — though not from competing. Eurovision director Martin Green expressed regret over Ireland's absence while affirming that the contest's power to bring people together "is even more important now in an increasingly difficult and divided world."

The contest has carried geopolitical freight since Israel first competed in 1973, but the current crisis has sharpened the question to a point that procedural adjustments cannot easily blunt. What began as a postwar celebration of shared culture has become a stage where nations register moral objections — and where the question of who belongs at the table has grown inseparable from the realities of war.

Ireland's national broadcaster announced Thursday that the country will sit out Eurovision for a second consecutive year, citing what it called the "appalling and ongoing loss of lives in Gaza" and the humanitarian catastrophe unfolding there. The decision places Ireland alongside the Netherlands, which made its own boycott announcement last month, in a widening protest against the song contest's continued inclusion of Israel as a competing nation.

This marks an escalation of a conflict that has shadowed the competition for years. Last year, five countries—Iceland, the Netherlands, Spain, Slovenia, and Ireland—refused to participate in the 2026 contest in protest of Israeli involvement. Now, with the 2027 competition set for Burgas on Bulgaria's Black Sea coast, at least two of those nations are doubling down. RTÉ, Ireland's state broadcaster, stated plainly that "participation cannot be justified given the appalling and ongoing loss of lives in Gaza and the humanitarian crisis there, which continues to put the lives of so many civilians at risk."

The Dutch public broadcaster Avrotros framed its own withdrawal in starker terms, describing Eurovision as no longer capable of being considered a neutral platform. The competition, Avrotros argued, "can no longer be considered neutral, with a participating country still involved in a large-scale military conflict." The European Broadcasting Union, which organizes the event, is now scrambling to find another Dutch broadcaster willing to step in, hoping to preserve the country's participation.

The underlying numbers give weight to the boycott's moral claim. Palestinian authorities report more than 73,000 deaths since Israel launched its military campaign in October 2023, following a Hamas-led attack that killed 1,200 people in southern Israel. Even after a US-brokered ceasefire took effect on October 11, 2025—a ceasefire meant to allow for eventual reconstruction—the violence has not stopped. According to Gaza's health ministry, 1,369 Palestinians have been killed and 4,627 wounded in the months since that supposed truce began.

Eurovision's leadership has attempted to address the political pressure. The EBU reduced the number of votes individual viewers could cast online or by telephone last year, responding to allegations that Israel had orchestrated a disproportionate public voting campaign. More substantially, last month the organization announced new rules: broadcasters from states involved in armed conflict or sensitive geopolitical situations would no longer be eligible to host the competition. The rule, however, does not bar such countries from competing—only from organizing the event.

Martin Green, Eurovision's director, said he respected RTÉ's decision while expressing regret. "They remain a valued part of our family and will be missed," he said, adding that the contest's power to unite people "is even more important now in an increasingly difficult and divided world." He signaled openness to future dialogue, noting that broadcasters decide annually whether to participate and that the EBU hopes to welcome Ireland back.

The contest has been a flashpoint for geopolitical tension since Israel began competing in 1973. In 2024, the European Commission intervened after organizers banned audience members from waving EU flags at the grand final in Sweden, calling the decision "mind-blowing" and "regrettable." What began as a song competition has become a stage where nations register their moral objections, and where the question of who belongs at the table has become inseparable from questions of war, suffering, and the limits of cultural neutrality.

RTÉ feels that Ireland's participation cannot be justified given the appalling and ongoing loss of lives in Gaza and the humanitarian crisis there
— RTÉ statement
Eurovision can no longer be considered neutral, with a participating country still involved in a large-scale military conflict
— Avrotros (Dutch broadcaster)
Contattaci Domande frequenti