Ten days before Iran's opening World Cup match on American soil, the United States granted visas to the Iranian football squad — a quiet but consequential act in a relationship defined by decades of hostility. The approval came only after Iran relocated its training camp to Mexico and US officials imposed firm conditions barring any delegation member with ties to the Islamic Revolutionary Guards. For the first time in the tournament's history, a host nation will welcome a team from a country it considers an active adversary, making this World Cup something more than a sporting event — a test o
Iran's football team granted US visas for World Cup after last-minute approval
The first World Cup where a host nation receives a team from a country it is at war with
Mark
Why did it take so long to issue these visas? Was it just bureaucracy, or something deeper?
Mimi
It was both. The US has real security concerns about Iranian officials and military figures. But there's also the fact that Iran and the US don't have normal diplomatic channels. Every decision has to be made at a high level, with scrutiny. A sports delegation isn't just a sports delegation when the two countries are in conflict.
Mark
The team moved to Mexico. That's a pretty dramatic step.
Mimi
It was a signal of how bad things had gotten. They couldn't train where they wanted to train. The federation's president said it was visa problems, but it was also a way of saying: we're not sure we're even going to be allowed to play.
Mark
What's the significance of this being the first World Cup where the host is at war with one of the teams?
Mimi
It breaks a rule that's been unspoken for decades. Sports have always been this space where countries can meet even when they're not talking otherwise. This time, that space is being tested. The US is saying yes, but with conditions—no Revolutionary Guards, no sneaking in operatives. It's sport, but it's not separate from politics.
Mark
Do you think the team will actually make it to Los Angeles?
Mimi
The visas are issued now. But there's still ten days. And the Iranian federation hasn't even commented yet. That silence is interesting. It could mean they're relieved, or it could mean they're still worried about something else we don't know about.
Mark
What happens if something goes wrong between now and June 15?
Mimi
That's the question no one wants to ask. But it's the reason the US made those statements about not allowing the system to be abused. Everyone's watching to see if this actually works.
Il Polso
- With just ten days until kickoff, Iran's football team had no confirmed right to set foot on American soil — weeks of visa delays had already forced them to abandon their Arizona training base for Mexico.
- US officials approved the visas but drew a hard line: the sports delegation would not be permitted to serve as cover for intelligence operatives, a condition that reflected the deep mutual suspicion between Washington and Tehran.
- Secretary of State Marco Rubio personally warned Congress that any delegation member linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guards would be barred — a political signal as much as a security measure.
- Iran's football federation stayed silent after the announcement, their quiet suggesting the exhaustion of an organization that had spent weeks threading a needle between geopolitics and the simple need to play football.
- The match against New Zealand on June 15 in Los Angeles is now set to proceed, but questions linger over whether every staff member will clear entry and what this uneasy precedent means for sport's relationship with statecraft.
Ten days before Iran's opening World Cup match on American soil, the United States granted visas to the Iranian football squad — a quiet but consequential act in a relationship defined by decades of hostility. The approval came only after Iran relocated its training camp to Mexico and US officials imposed firm conditions barring any delegation member with ties to the Islamic Revolutionary Guards. For the first time in the tournament's history, a host nation will welcome a team from a country it considers an active adversary, making this World Cup something more than a sporting event — a test of whether competition can exist where diplomacy has long failed.
Ten days before Iran's opening match against New Zealand in Los Angeles, US officials confirmed that visas had been issued for the Iranian football team's athletes and support staff. The relief was real, but it arrived wrapped in conditions: Washington made clear the visa process would not be used as a channel for operatives entering under the cover of a sports delegation.
The road to approval had been turbulent. In late May, with documentation still unresolved, Iran's football federation moved its training base from Tucson, Arizona to Mexico — a logistical retreat that federation president Mehdi Taj attributed directly to the visa impasse. As recently as the Friday before approval, reports indicated that parts of Iran's technical and administrative staff still lacked clearance to enter the country.
The diplomatic weight behind each delay was hard to ignore. This World Cup — hosted jointly by the US, Canada, and Mexico beginning June 11 — would be the first in history where a host nation receives a team from a country it is actively in conflict with. Secretary of State Marco Rubio reinforced the tension when he told Congress that no member of Iran's delegation could hold ties to the Islamic Revolutionary Guards, the military branch at the center of US-Iran hostilities.
Iran's football federation offered no public statement following the announcement. Their silence read as the quiet of an organization worn down by weeks of bureaucratic and geopolitical navigation. The visas had been granted and the match was scheduled for June 15 — but whether all delegation members would ultimately clear entry, and what it means for sport to unfold in the shadow of open conflict, remained unresolved questions.
Ten days before Iran's opening match against New Zealand in Los Angeles, word came through: the visas had been approved. After weeks of uncertainty and last-minute scrambling, the Iranian football team would be allowed to compete in the World Cup on American soil.
The confirmation arrived from US officials, who stated plainly that the necessary documentation for athletes and support staff had been issued. But the approval came with a sharp caveat. The US would not permit Iran to exploit the visa process as cover for smuggling operatives into the country under the guise of a sports delegation. The message was unmistakable: this permission had limits, and those limits would be enforced.
The path to this moment had been fraught. In late May, with visa complications mounting, Iran's football federation made the decision to relocate its training base from Tucson, Arizona to Mexico. Mehdi Taj, the federation's president, attributed the move directly to visa obstacles. As recently as Friday—just days before the official approval—news reports indicated that portions of Iran's technical and administrative staff still lacked the documentation needed to enter the United States. The uncertainty had cast a shadow over the team's preparation.
The diplomatic backdrop made every delay feel weighted. This World Cup, beginning June 11 and hosted jointly by the US, Canada, and Mexico, would be the first in the tournament's history where a host nation received a team from a country with which it was actively in conflict. The symbolism was unavoidable. Earlier in the week, Secretary of State Marco Rubio had made clear to Congress that no member of Iran's delegation could have ties to the Islamic Revolutionary Guards, the powerful military branch that sits at the center of US-Iran tensions. The condition was not negotiable.
The Iranian football federation had not yet issued a public statement about the visa approvals at the time of the announcement. Their silence suggested either caution or the simple exhaustion of a federation that had spent weeks navigating bureaucratic and geopolitical obstacles just to field a team.
What remained unclear was whether the approval would hold, whether all members of the delegation would ultimately make it through, and what the precedent of hosting Iran's team on American territory during a period of hostility might mean for future tournaments. The visas had been granted. The match was set for June 15. But the story of how this World Cup would unfold—and what it would say about the relationship between sport and statecraft—was only beginning.
Citazioni salienti
The visas necessary for Iran to compete in the World Cup, including for athletes and necessary support staff, have been issued.— US officials
The US would not allow the Iranian team to abuse this system to sneak terrorists into the United States under false pretenses.— US officials
Vuoi la storia completa?
Leggi l'originale su BBC ↗
Sports