Iranian President Says Previous Detainee Deals Failed, Cites Obstacles to Releasing Americans

Americans are being wrongfully detained in Iran with uncertain prospects for release.
We tested it, and it didn't work in previous deals
Pezeshkian cited failed past agreements when asked whether he would release Americans held wrongfully in Iran.
Mark

So Pezeshkian is saying past deals failed. What does that mean exactly—failed how?

Mimi

He didn't specify. He just said they tested it and it didn't work. The implication is that Iran tried releasing people before under some agreement, and something about that arrangement broke down or didn't deliver what Iran expected.

Luke

But we don't actually know what he's referring to. Is he talking about the 2016 prisoner swap? Some other arrangement? He's vague enough that we can't really verify his claim.

Mimi

That's fair. He's using history as a shield without opening the history up for examination.

Mark

Does this mean he won't release anyone?

Mimi

Not necessarily. He's saying the path is harder than it looks. He's citing obstacles, not saying no.

Luke

Though "we tested it and it didn't work" does sound pretty final. It's not "we're open to trying again." It's "we tried, it failed, so here we are."

Mark

How many Americans are we talking about?

Mimi

The source doesn't say. It just refers to Americans "determined to be wrongfully detained." The State Department has made those designations, but the exact number isn't in this interview.

Luke

Which is a gap. If we're going to understand the scale of the problem, we need to know how many people are stuck.

Mark

What happens next?

Mimi

That's the real question. If Pezeshkian is closing the door, negotiations stall. If he's just setting conditions, there's room to move.

Luke

But based on what he actually said, we can't tell which one it is.

  • Iranian President Pezeshkian told CBS's Margaret Brennan flatly that past deals to free wrongfully detained Americans had been tried and had failed — offering no path forward.
  • Several American citizens remain imprisoned in Iranian facilities, formally designated by the U.S. State Department as wrongfully held, often used as political leverage in broader disputes.
  • The exchange lays bare a deepening impasse: the U.S. accuses Iran of using prisoners as bargaining chips, while Iran argues that American sanctions make any agreement too unstable to honor.
  • Pezeshkian offered no conditions, no guarantees, and no diplomatic softening — leaving open whether Iran is seeking better terms or has quietly decided the issue is not worth resolving.
  • The detainees themselves remain in limbo, their futures suspended between diplomatic calculations that show no sign of breaking in their favor.

In a direct exchange with CBS's Margaret Brennan, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian declined to signal any willingness to release Americans the U.S. government has formally designated as wrongfully detained, citing the failure of previous negotiated agreements as his justification. His words — spare and unhedged — place the fate of imprisoned Americans inside a longer, unresolved story of mutual distrust between Washington and Tehran, where each side has come to see the other's promises as fragile at best and cynical at worst. The question of whether his skepticism reflects a principled reading of history or a strategic refusal to engage remains, for now, unanswered.

When CBS's Margaret Brennan asked Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian directly whether he would release Americans the U.S. has determined are being wrongfully held in Iran, his answer was brief and unsparing: previous attempts had been made, and they had not worked. "We tested it, and it didn't work," he said — a short sentence carrying the weight of years of failed negotiation.

The remark reflects a position that has grown harder over time. The U.S. State Department has formally designated several American detentions in Iran as wrongful, meaning the individuals are held without legitimate legal basis — often as political leverage or bargaining chips in broader diplomatic disputes. For years, both governments have accused the other of bad faith: Washington argues Iran uses prisoners as tools of coercion; Tehran contends that American sanctions make any agreement too unstable to survive.

Pezeshkian's invocation of failed past deals frames the history of negotiations not as a reason to try differently, but as a cautionary record. He offered no detail about what went wrong in earlier arrangements, and no indication of what conditions might make a new agreement possible — or whether Iran considers one desirable at all.

What his answer leaves unresolved is the more consequential question: does his skepticism reflect a genuine belief that past agreements were poorly designed, or does it signal something closer to a settled unwillingness to act? The Americans held in Iranian custody remain in an uncertain place, their prospects tied to diplomatic calculations that, for now, show no sign of shifting.

Margaret Brennan sat down with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on Friday to ask a direct question: would he release the Americans that the United States government has determined are being held wrongfully in Iran? His answer was blunt. Previous attempts to negotiate such releases had been tried before, he said, and they had failed. "We tested it, and it didn't work," Pezeshkian told Brennan, pointing to the track record of past agreements as evidence that the path forward was more complicated than simply striking a new deal.

The statement reflects a hardening position on one of the most persistent friction points between Washington and Tehran. For years, the two countries have grappled over the fate of American citizens imprisoned in Iranian facilities. The U.S. State Department has formally designated several of these detentions as wrongful—meaning the individuals are held without legitimate legal basis, often for political leverage or as bargaining chips in broader diplomatic disputes.

Pezeshkian's invocation of failed previous deals suggests he views the history of negotiations as a cautionary tale. Rather than a sign that diplomacy should be abandoned, his framing implies that Iran has learned from past attempts and now sees obstacles where earlier negotiators may have seen opportunity. He did not elaborate on what specifically went wrong in those earlier arrangements, nor did he detail what conditions or guarantees Iran might require before considering any new releases.

The timing of the interview underscores the ongoing tension. Even as both nations have engaged in periodic diplomatic overtures, the question of detained Americans remains unresolved. Each side accuses the other of bad faith—the U.S. argues that Iran uses prisoners as leverage; Iran contends that American sanctions and hostility make any agreement fragile and unreliable.

Brennan's question was straightforward, and Pezeshkian's response was equally direct, offering no hedging or diplomatic softening. The brevity of his answer—that previous deals simply did not work—left open the question of whether Iran might be willing to negotiate under different terms, or whether the Iranian government has concluded that releasing detainees is not in its strategic interest. What remains unclear is whether Pezeshkian's skepticism reflects a genuine belief that past agreements were flawed in their design, or whether it signals a deeper unwillingness to move forward on the issue at all. The Americans held in Iranian custody remain in limbo, their fates tied to diplomatic calculations that show no sign of shifting.

We tested it, and it didn't work
— Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, referring to previous agreements on releasing detained Americans
Contact Us FAQ