On a late July Tuesday, Iran's military spokesman warned that any nation or company that helps Washington draw on Iranian funds held abroad would be shut out of the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow passage through which a fifth of the world's traded oil and gas once flowed. The threat answers President Trump's proposal to pay for ship damage from Iranian attacks with frozen Iranian money, a move Tehran's foreign minister called an incendiary precedent that could unsettle the financial trust nations rely on. Both sides are now trading their leverage: money on one side, a vital chokepoint on the oth
Iran Threatens Hormuz Ban for Countries Seizing Frozen Assets as Trump Vows to 'Finish the Job'
Iran puts a price on the strait: help seize our assets, lose passage
Mark
Why does a threat about frozen money end up being a threat about a shipping lane?
Mimi
Because that's the leverage Iran has. Trump proposed using frozen Iranian assets to pay for ship damage, and Iran's answer is to say anyone who helps will be barred from the strait, which carried about a fifth of traded oil and gas before the war.
Luke
Worth noting that's a stated warning from Zolfaghari, not an enforced ban. The reporting doesn't describe any ship actually being turned away.
Mark
And Araghchi's phrase, "incendiary precedent"? What is he getting at?
Mimi
That seizing a nation's assets to pay for unrelated future claims weakens global financial norms. He's speaking to any country that holds reserves abroad.
Luke
That's his argument, and it's an interested one. The source doesn't include an independent legal assessment of whether the plan would even be lawful.
Mark
Trump also repeated his infrastructure threats on Fox News.
Mimi
Bridges in under an hour, power plants within a day, then desalination plants. But he also said he'd rather avoid it.
Luke
Those are claims about capability and intent, from him alone. Nothing here confirms the timelines, and no strikes are reported as having happened.
Mark
So what's actually unknown?
Luke
Who would participate in the asset plan, how much money is involved, and how Iran would enforce a ban. None of that is in the reporting.
O Pulso
- Iran has threatened to bar any country or firm that joins Trump's frozen-asset plan from the Strait of Hormuz, raising the stakes of a shipping lane the world depends on.
- Trump's proposal to cover ship damage with seized Iranian funds has drawn sharp objections from Tehran, which calls it a dangerous precedent for every state holding reserves abroad.
- Trump has threatened to strike Iranian bridges, power plants and desalination plants, claiming he could do so quickly if leaders refuse a deal.
- No concrete seizure or closure has been reported yet; both sides are issuing warnings, and it remains unclear who would be asked to participate or how a ban would be enforced.
On a late July Tuesday, Iran's military spokesman warned that any nation or company that helps Washington draw on Iranian funds held abroad would be shut out of the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow passage through which a fifth of the world's traded oil and gas once flowed. The threat answers President Trump's proposal to pay for ship damage from Iranian attacks with frozen Iranian money, a move Tehran's foreign minister called an incendiary precedent that could unsettle the financial trust nations rely on. Both sides are now trading their leverage: money on one side, a vital chokepoint on the other, while the war that began in February still lacks an end.
On Tuesday, July 28, Iran placed a condition on one of the world's most vital shipping lanes. Anyone who helps tap Iran's frozen assets, the military spokesperson Ebrahim Zolfaghari said, will be barred from the Strait of Hormuz. He described the US plan as an unlawful action.
The warning responds to a recent social media post by Donald Trump, who said that damage to ships from Iranian attacks in the strait would be paid from Iranian money held and controlled by the United States. The strait, on Iran's southern coast, carried about a fifth of the world's traded oil and gas before the war began on February 28, so any restriction there draws attention far beyond the region.
Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, called the proposal an incendiary precedent, arguing that seizing a nation's assets to settle unrelated claims undermines global financial norms. Tehran frames the issue as one of principle for any state with reserves abroad.
Trump did not soften his stance. In a Fox News interview he again threatened Iranian infrastructure, saying the US would finish the job if leaders do not end the war. He claimed he could take out most of Iran's bridges within an hour, power plants within a day, and then desalination plants, adding that he would prefer to avoid doing so.
For now, both sides are issuing warnings rather than taking concrete steps. The next questions are whether any country or firm moves to use the frozen funds, and whether Iran acts on its threat to restrict passage through the strait.
On Tuesday, July 28, Iran put a condition on one of the world's most important shipping lanes: any country or company that helps tap its frozen assets will be barred from the Strait of Hormuz. The warning came from Ebrahim Zolfaghari, spokesperson for Iran's joint military command, who said that anyone joining what he called Donald Trump's "unlawful action" would be shut out of the strait.
The threat answers a social media post the US president made last week. Trump said damage to ships from Iranian attacks in the strait would be paid for with Iranian money that the United States holds and controls. In other words, funds frozen abroad would be used to cover losses from the conflict at sea.
The strait sits on Iran's southern coast. Before the US-Israel-Iran war began on February 28, it carried about a fifth of the world's traded oil and gas, which is why a restriction on who may pass through it draws attention well beyond the region.
Iran's objections to the asset plan were not limited to the military. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi earlier described the proposal as an "incendiary precedent." His argument was that seizing a nation's assets to settle unrelated future claims undermines global financial norms. Tehran is framing the issue as one of principle for any state that keeps reserves abroad, not only a bilateral dispute.
Trump, for his part, did not soften his position. In an interview with Fox News, he again threatened Iran's infrastructure. He said Iran knows the United States will "finish the job" if its leaders do not reach a deal to end the war. He claimed he would need less than an hour to "take out" most of the country's bridges, and said he could blow up its power plants within one day and then go after desalination plants. He added: "You know, if I can avoid doing that, I'd like to do that."
Taken together, the two sides have set out their leverage in plain terms. Washington points to the frozen funds and to strikes on civilian-linked infrastructure. Tehran points to control of a chokepoint that matters to global energy supply. Neither statement, as reported, describes a concrete step already taken. They are warnings, aimed at governments and companies that might be asked to take part in the asset plan, and at Iranian leaders weighing a deal.
What to watch next is whether any country or firm actually moves to use the frozen assets, and whether Iran then acts on its threat to restrict passage. The reporting does not say how such a ban would be enforced or which parties are being asked to participate. For now, the war that began in late February is still without a deal, and both sides are talking about the strait and the infrastructure behind it as the next pressure points.
Citações Notáveis
Any countries or companies joining Trump's "unlawful action" will be barred from using the strait.— Ebrahim Zolfaghari, spokesperson, Iran's joint military command (paraphrased)
If I can avoid doing that, I'd like to do that.— Donald Trump, to Fox News
Quer a matéria completa?
Leia o original em Times Now ↗
War & Conflict