On the last day of July, Iran's Revolutionary Guards said they had struck two oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, vessels they claimed were trying to cross under American air cover by a route Tehran does not recognize. The waterway has been under Iranian control since the war began on February 28, and passage now depends on permission and fees, so the quarrel is as much about who may decide where a ship sails as about the sea itself. Yet the account arrives from one side alone, with no word yet from Washington or the shipowners, and the strait's narrow lanes are being fought over by stories t
Iran Says It Struck Two Tankers Under US Air Escort Attempting Hormuz Transit
Four other tankers quickly changed course and returned to their previous positions
Mark
So what actually happened on Friday?
Mimi
Iran's Revolutionary Guards said they struck two oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz. They say the ships were moving under a US military air escort.
Mark
And the other ships?
Mimi
Four more tankers, according to the Guards, changed course quickly and went back to where they had been.
Luke
I want to flag that all of this is the IRGC's account. We have no US statement, no word from the shipowners, and no description of damage in what's been reported.
Mark
What's the "undeclared route" they keep mentioning?
Mimi
It's the US-backed alternative to the waterway Tehran designated, which sits closer to Iran's coast. The Guards say the tankers used that one.
Mark
Why does Iran get to say which route counts?
Mimi
It's been controlling navigation through Hormuz since the war began on February 28. Ships need permission and have to pay transit fees.
Luke
Worth saying that's Iran's de facto control, described as effective control. It isn't the same as a recognized legal right, and the source doesn't claim it is.
Mark
There was also something on Thursday?
Mimi
Yes, the Guards said two tankers turned back after one caught fire. The cause isn't given.
Luke
So we shouldn't link Thursday and Friday as one campaign. The reporting only shows two similar claims on consecutive days.
El Pulso
- Iran's Revolutionary Guards claim they hit two oil tankers that were attempting an unauthorized route through Hormuz.
- The strikes are said to have occurred while the vessels were under reported US air escort, raising the stakes of the crossing.
- Four other tankers reportedly turned back immediately, a sign that the threat is working as a deterrent.
- A day earlier, two tankers had already turned around after one caught fire, so the pattern of disruption is building.
- Traffic through the strait is nearly frozen, with only a single LNG tanker exiting in nearly three weeks.
- Everything rests on whether escorted transits continue or stop, and whether the route dispute pulls Washington and Tehran into direct confrontation.
On the last day of July, Iran's Revolutionary Guards said they had struck two oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, vessels they claimed were trying to cross under American air cover by a route Tehran does not recognize. The waterway has been under Iranian control since the war began on February 28, and passage now depends on permission and fees, so the quarrel is as much about who may decide where a ship sails as about the sea itself. Yet the account arrives from one side alone, with no word yet from Washington or the shipowners, and the strait's narrow lanes are being fought over by stories that cannot all be checked.
On Friday, Iran's Revolutionary Guards announced that they had struck two oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz. According to the Guards, the ships were attempting to pass under the air escort of the United States military, using what Tehran calls an undeclared route. That route is the American-backed alternative to the lane Iran has designated, which hugs its own coastline. The dispute is partly about geography and partly about authority: who has the right to say which path a ship may take.
That authority has been contested since the war began on February 28. Since then Iran has effectively controlled navigation through Hormuz, requiring vessels to obtain permission and pay transit fees. By Tehran's reasoning, a ship that refuses this system is non-compliant. The day before the strikes were announced, the Guards said two tankers had turned back after one caught fire, though the cause of the fire is not given, so it is unclear whether the two incidents are connected.
The IRGC says four more tankers quickly changed course and returned to their previous positions. The only other movement reported was a QatarEnergy LNG tanker leaving the strait, its first exit in nearly three weeks, a measure of how thin traffic has become.
The account rests entirely on the Guards' word. There is no statement from the US military or from the tankers' owners, and it is not known where the struck ships ended up or what damage they took. What remains to be seen is whether American-escorted transits continue, and whether this contest over a sea lane turns into direct military engagement between Washington and Tehran.
On Friday, Iran's Revolutionary Guards announced that they had struck two oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz. According to the Guards, the vessels were trying to pass through the strategic waterway under the "air escort" of the United States military. The claim came out of Tehran, and the source reporting carries it as the Guards' account.
The IRGC described the ships as "non-compliant" and said they were struck and brought to a halt. It added that four other oil tankers quickly changed course and returned to their previous positions. The statement did not, in the reporting available, say where the two struck ships ended up or what damage they sustained.
The Guards said the tankers had tried to cross by what they called an "undeclared route." That route is the US-backed alternative to the waterway Tehran has designated, which runs closer to Iran's own shores. The dispute, in other words, is partly about geography: which lane ships take, and who has the authority to say.
That authority has been contested since the war began on February 28. Since then, Iran has effectively kept control over navigation through Hormuz. Vessels are required to obtain permission and pay transit fees before using the waterway. A ship that declines to follow that system, by Tehran's logic, is non-compliant.
Friday's announcement followed another one a day earlier. On Thursday, the Guards said two oil tankers attempting to transit the strait had turned back after one of them caught fire. The reporting does not specify the cause of the fire, so it remains unclear from this account whether the two incidents are connected beyond the pattern of ships being turned away.
The same coverage points to one other movement through the strait: a QatarEnergy-controlled LNG tanker exited Hormuz, the first to do so in nearly three weeks. That detail gives a sense of how thin traffic has become under the current arrangement.
What the reporting does not offer is independent confirmation. The account of the strikes, the escort, and the four tankers that backed off comes from the IRGC. There is no statement from the US military or from the tankers' owners in the material here, and the editorial assessment of the reporting is medium confidence.
What to watch next is whether US-escorted transits continue or stop after Friday, and whether the dispute over which route is legitimate edges toward direct military engagement between Washington and Tehran.
Citas Notables
The non-compliant oil tankers were struck and brought to a halt, while four others quickly changed course and returned to their previous positions.— Iran's Revolutionary Guards (IRGC)
Quieres la nota completa?
Lee el original en The Economic Times ↗
War & Conflict