At a Long Island rally, Donald Trump declared his intention to claim the Strait of Hormuz as American territory following what he described as Iran's inevitable defeat, a statement that carries the weight of history's long contest between empire and sovereignty. Tehran answered swiftly, with Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister asserting that the strait cannot be taken by tweet or carrier group, and that it has been and will remain Iranian. The exchange is more than political theater — it is a collision between two visions of who holds dominion over the passage through which a third of the world's s
Iran rejects Trump's claim to seize Strait of Hormuz, tensions escalate
The strait cannot be seized by tweet, nor by aircraft carrier
Mark
So Trump is saying he'll literally claim the Strait of Hormuz as American territory after the war ends. Is that even a thing a president can do?
Mimi
He's stating an intention, not describing a legal mechanism. What matters is that he's signaling total commitment to controlling the waterway—through military force now, through formal annexation later.
Luke
But we should be clear: this is Trump making a campaign-style claim at a rally. There's no actual legal framework for seizing international waters. The Strait is recognized under international law as a strait used for international navigation.
Mark
Right, so when Gharibabadi says it can't be seized by tweet or aircraft carrier, he's saying Iran won't accept this claim no matter how it's framed?
Mimi
Exactly. He's rejecting the entire premise—that Iran is being defeated, that control is shifting, that the strait is up for grabs. He's reasserting Iranian sovereignty as non-negotiable.
Luke
Though we should note: the naval blockade Trump describes as total control is real. The US Navy is actively restricting Iranian shipping. Whether that constitutes "total control" is a matter of perspective, but the military pressure is concrete.
Mark
And then there's the attack on the ADNOC vessel. Is that Iran striking back?
Mimi
ADNOC confirmed the attack happened, but didn't attribute it. The UAE has accused Iran of previous attacks on their vessels in the strait, but Iran hasn't claimed responsibility for this one.
Luke
That's important—we know a vessel was attacked. We don't know who did it or why. There are other actors in the region with reasons to target shipping.
Mark
So the strait is becoming more dangerous for commercial traffic?
Mimi
Absolutely. Ships are being attacked, negotiations are frozen, and both sides are making maximalist claims about control. That's a recipe for more incidents.
Luke
And the broader point: this isn't just about geopolitics. One-third of global seaborne oil moves through that strait. Instability there affects energy prices and supply chains worldwide.
El Pulso
- Trump's rally declaration — that the US will claim Hormuz as its territory after Iran's defeat — escalated an already volatile standoff into the realm of explicit territorial ambition.
- Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister fired back with pointed clarity: the strait cannot be seized by tweet, executive order, or aircraft carrier, and Tehran will neither fear threats nor yield to military pressure.
- A UAE-owned ADNOC vessel was attacked while transiting Hormuz on Friday evening, the latest in a series of maritime incidents that are turning rhetorical conflict into physical danger.
- Trump's naval blockade, which he calls a wall of steel, frames American control as already total — but Iran's defiant response signals the contest is far from settled.
- With US-Iran negotiations stalled and both sides hardening their positions, the world's most critical oil chokepoint remains claimed by both, controlled by neither, and increasingly perilous for all who depend on it.
At a Long Island rally, Donald Trump declared his intention to claim the Strait of Hormuz as American territory following what he described as Iran's inevitable defeat, a statement that carries the weight of history's long contest between empire and sovereignty. Tehran answered swiftly, with Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister asserting that the strait cannot be taken by tweet or carrier group, and that it has been and will remain Iranian. The exchange is more than political theater — it is a collision between two visions of who holds dominion over the passage through which a third of the world's seaborne oil must travel. With negotiations stalled and ships already under attack in those waters, the strait has become a crucible where rhetoric and reality are converging at dangerous speed.
Donald Trump stood before a Republican rally on Long Island and made a declaration that would, if realized, redraw the map of global energy: after the United States defeats Iran, he said, the Strait of Hormuz will become American territory. He framed the claim not as aspiration but as certainty, telling supporters that Washington already held total control through a naval blockade he described as a wall of steel. The crowd cheered. The world took note.
Tehran's response came quickly and without diplomatic softening. Kazem Gharibabadi, Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister, posted a pointed rebuttal: the Strait of Hormuz has been Iranian, is Iranian, and will remain Iranian. The strait, he wrote, cannot be seized by tweet, by aircraft carrier, or by campaign rhetoric. Iran, he added, fears neither threats nor shows of force. The language was measured but absolute — a formal rejection of American territorial ambition.
The stakes of this exchange are not abstract. The Strait of Hormuz, threading between Iran and Oman into the Arabian Sea, carries roughly one-third of all seaborne traded oil. Whoever controls it shapes global energy flows. Trump's blockade is an attempt to leverage that geography against Iran; Gharibabadi's response signals that Tehran views the contest as ongoing, not concluded.
The rhetoric is shadowed by real violence. On Friday evening, a vessel operated by ADNOC, the UAE's state oil company, was attacked while transiting the strait. No crew were hurt, but the incident — one of several in recent days involving ADNOC ships — illustrated how quickly the waterway's tensions translate into physical danger. Negotiations between Washington and Tehran remain stalled, and neither side shows appetite for compromise. The Strait of Hormuz, vital to the world economy, is claimed by both powers, controlled by neither, and growing more dangerous by the day.
Donald Trump stood before a Republican rally on Long Island on Friday and made a territorial claim that would reshape one of the world's most critical shipping lanes. After the United States defeats Iran, he said, he would declare the Strait of Hormuz a territory of the United States. The statement was not hypothetical musing—it was a direct assertion of intent, delivered to cheering supporters and amplified across social media. Trump had already claimed that Washington exercised total control over the waterway through its naval blockade, which he described as a wall of steel that Iran could do nothing to counter. He promised to keep that control.
The reaction from Tehran was swift and categorical. Kazem Gharibabadi, Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister, posted a response on social media that rejected Trump's framing entirely. The Strait of Hormuz, Gharibabadi wrote, has been Iranian, is Iranian, and will remain Iranian. He addressed Trump's claim directly: the strait cannot be seized by tweet, by aircraft carrier, by executive order, or by campaign rhetoric. Iran, he added, neither fears threats nor submits to displays of military power. The language was defiant but measured—a formal rejection of the American president's territorial ambitions.
The exchange reflects a deeper conflict over who controls one of the world's most strategically vital passages. The Strait of Hormuz sits between Iran and Oman and connects the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. Roughly one-third of all seaborne traded oil passes through it. Control of the strait means control over global energy flows. Trump's naval blockade, which he characterized as total and unassailable, represents an attempt to choke off Iranian commerce and leverage. Gharibabadi's rejection signals that Iran views this not as a fait accompli but as an ongoing contest.
The tensions are not merely rhetorical. On Friday evening, August 14, a vessel operated by the UAE's state-owned oil company ADNOC came under attack while transiting the Strait of Hormuz. ADNOC confirmed the incident in a statement released the following day. No crew members were injured, but the attack underscored the volatility of the waterway. This was not the first such incident—the UAE had accused Iran of attacking two ADNOC vessels in the strait just days earlier. Each attack, each accusation, each denial adds another layer to the escalating cycle.
Negotiations between Washington and Tehran over reopening the strait and resolving the broader conflict remain stalled. Trump's Long Island speech, with its confident prediction of Iranian defeat and American territorial acquisition, suggests little appetite in Washington for compromise. Gharibabadi's response indicates Iran will not concede sovereignty or control through military pressure alone. The Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most important economic arteries, remains contested territory—claimed by both sides, controlled by neither, and increasingly dangerous for the ships that must pass through it.
Citas Notables
The Strait of Hormuz has been Iranian, is Iranian, and will remain Iranian. Trump has said that after Iran's defeat, he will soon declare the Strait of Hormuz as US territory. The Strait of Hormuz cannot be seized by tweet, nor by aircraft carrier, nor by issuing an order, nor by an election speech.— Kazem Gharibabadi, Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister
After we finish defeating Iran, which is being very badly defeated—pretty soon I'll be declaring the Hormuz Strait a territory of the United States.— Donald Trump, at a Republican rally in Long Island
Quieres la nota completa?
Lee el original en Livemint ↗
Politics & Governance