Iran Pressures Iraq to Restore Flights as US Sanctions Cripple Aviation Links

Millions of Iranian and Iraqi citizens face disrupted travel; pilgrims unable to reach Shia holy sites; protests erupted across Iraqi cities including Najaf, Nasiriya, Karbala, and Amarah.
Millions of citizens need to travel. Restrictions require independence.
Iran's Foreign Ministry statement framing the flight ban as a humanitarian issue affecting ordinary people on both sides.
Mark

So Iran is asking Iraq to just ignore the US sanctions and let flights resume?

Mimi

Not quite. Iran is asking Iraq to lift the restrictions that Iraqi airports have imposed. The actual ban comes from Washington—it targets any company that does business with Iranian airlines. Ground handlers won't touch Iranian planes because they fear US penalties.

Luke

Right, so Iraq's hands are somewhat tied. The government didn't formally ban the flights; private companies made the choice. But that distinction doesn't help the passenger stuck in Baghdad.

Mark

What's the human impact here? Who's actually affected?

Mimi

Millions of people. Pilgrims trying to reach Shia holy sites in Iran. Patients needing medical care. Students. Anyone with family on either side. And now they're driving twelve hours instead of flying.

Luke

The source mentions protests in four Iraqi cities. That's significant, but we should note those are reported by Press TV, which is Iranian state media. The scale of the protests isn't independently confirmed.

Mark

Has Iraq tried to negotiate with the US?

Mimi

Yes. The government asked for humanitarian exemptions—carve-outs for medical, educational, and religious travel. It's a signal that they're looking for a diplomatic solution.

Luke

But there's no indication the US has responded positively. The request is on the table, but the outcome is unknown.

Mark

And the partial reopening at Najaf—is that a sign things are improving?

Mimi

It's a small opening, but Iran sees it as incomplete. They want full restoration, not a partial fix that leaves three major airports closed.

Luke

The source credits Prime Minister al-Zaidi with the Najaf reopening, but it's not entirely clear what leverage he actually used or whether it's sustainable. The ambassador says Iraq never formally suspended flights, which is technically true but obscures the practical reality.

  • US sanctions that took effect September 23 triggered a cascade of private-sector fear, with ground-handling companies across Iraq refusing to service Iranian aircraft rather than risk American penalties.
  • The near-total collapse of Iran-Iraq air travel — a 42% drop in Tehran's international flights — has stranded pilgrims, separated families, and forced travelers onto grueling 12-hour overland journeys.
  • Protests erupted in Najaf, Nasiriya, Karbala, and Amarah as citizens gathered outside airports and in city streets, transforming a diplomatic dispute into a visible, public crisis.
  • Iraq's government insists it never formally banned Iranian flights, pointing to private companies' choices — but the practical result is indistinguishable from a state-imposed closure.
  • A partial resumption at Najaf airport offers symbolic relief while Baghdad pursues humanitarian exemptions from Washington for medical, religious, and educational travel.
  • Iran frames the crisis as extraterritorial coercion and demands full restoration, leaving the two neighbors to negotiate a path forward inside a corridor of pressure neither fully controls.

When a distant power imposes its will through economic instruments, the consequences rarely stay within intended borders — they spill into the lives of pilgrims, patients, and ordinary families. Since September 23, American sanctions on Iranian airlines have quietly dismantled the air corridors between Iran and Iraq, leaving millions of citizens to navigate a disruption they did not choose and cannot easily escape. Iran's Foreign Ministry has called on Baghdad to assert its sovereignty and restore full flight service, while Iraq — caught between Washington's reach and Tehran's needs — has managed only a partial reopening at Najaf airport. The episode reveals how modern sanctions, enforced through the fear of private companies rather than the orders of governments, can reshape entire regions without a single formal declaration.

On September 23, the United States imposed sweeping sanctions on Iranian airlines, and the effects reached Iraq almost immediately. Ground-handling companies — the firms that fuel planes, load cargo, and process passengers — quietly stopped servicing Iranian carriers, unwilling to risk exposure to American penalties. Within days, flights between the two countries had largely disappeared. Baghdad, Erbil, and Sulaimaniyah went silent. Only Najaf managed a partial restart on Monday evening, a reprieve that Iran's government called far from enough.

On Thursday, Iran's Foreign Ministry issued a sharp statement condemning Washington's "illegal and inhumane" use of what it called extraterritorial enforcement — the practice of punishing foreign companies for doing business with Iranian entities. The ministry called on Iraq to act with independence and restore full air service, framing the issue as one of basic human movement for millions of citizens on both sides of the border.

Iraq's position was uncomfortable. Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi had overseen the Najaf reopening, and Baghdad's ambassador to Iran argued that Iraq had never formally suspended the flights — that private companies had acted on their own fear. But the practical reality was unchanged: travelers faced overland journeys of twelve hours or more, pilgrims found their routes to Shia holy sites in Iran blocked, and protests broke out in Najaf, Nasiriya, Karbala, and Amarah.

The broader picture was stark. FlightRadar24 data showed Tehran's Imam Khomeini International Airport had lost 42% of its flights since the sanctions took effect. Routes to Georgia, Oman, Azerbaijan, and Dubai had ceased entirely. Only flights to China held steady, while the busy Turkey corridor had declined by 19%.

Seeking a way through the impasse, Iraq approached Washington to request humanitarian exemptions covering medical, educational, and religious travel. Whether those negotiations would yield results remained uncertain. For now, the partial opening at Najaf stood as an uneasy compromise — insufficient for Tehran, inadequate for the millions of travelers caught in the sanctions' long shadow.

On September 23, the United States imposed sweeping sanctions on Iranian airlines, and within days the consequences rippled across Iraq's airspace. Ground-handling companies—the firms that service planes, load cargo, and manage passenger operations—refused to work with Iranian carriers, fearful that doing so would expose them to American penalties. By late September, flights between Iraq and Iran had largely vanished. Baghdad's main airport went silent. So did Erbil and Sulaimaniyah. Only Najaf, in the Shia-majority south, managed to restart service on Monday evening, a partial reprieve that Iran's government immediately deemed insufficient.

On Thursday, Iran's Foreign Ministry issued a statement condemning what it called Washington's "illegal and inhumane" use of sanctions to strangle Iran's aviation sector through what it termed "extraterritorial enforcement"—the practice of penalizing foreign companies for doing business with Iranian entities. The ministry called on Iraq to remove all remaining restrictions and restore full air service between the two nations. The statement framed the issue in terms of basic human movement: millions of Iranian and Iraqi citizens needed to travel, it said, and resolving the dispute required Baghdad to act with independence and responsibility.

Iraq's government found itself caught between two pressures. Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi had overseen the limited reopening at Najaf, and Iraq's ambassador to Iran, Yasser Abdulzahra al-Hajjaj, insisted that Baghdad had never formally decided to suspend Iranian flights—the suspensions, he suggested, were the result of private companies' fear of sanctions, not state policy. Yet the practical effect was the same. Passengers who would normally fly from Baghdad or Erbil to Iran now faced overland journeys of at least twelve hours. Pilgrims traveling to Shia holy sites in Iran found their routes blocked. The disruption sparked protests in Najaf, Nasiriya, Karbala, and Amarah, with crowds gathering outside airports and in city streets to voice their anger.

The scale of Iran's isolation became clear in the data. According to FlightRadar24, an aviation monitoring service, flights to and from Tehran's Imam Khomeini International Airport had fallen by 42 percent since the sanctions took effect. Routes to Georgia, Oman, and Azerbaijan had ceased entirely. Service to Dubai was suspended. Flights to China remained stable, and the route to Turkey—Iran's busiest international air corridor—had declined by only 19 percent, though individual airlines were shifting their schedules unpredictably. The picture was one of a country systematically cut off from the world's air networks.

Iraq, seeking a way out of the impasse, had approached Washington with a request for humanitarian exemptions. The government asked the United States to carve out exceptions for medical treatment, education, religious visits, and civilian needs—a plea that acknowledged both the severity of the disruption and the possibility of negotiated relief. Whether such exemptions might materialize remained unclear. For now, the partial reopening at Najaf stood as a compromise that satisfied neither Tehran nor the millions of travelers stranded by the sanctions' reach.

The movement of millions of Iranian and Iraqi citizens required an independent and responsible approach to disagreements between the two governments.
— Iran's Foreign Ministry statement
Baghdad had not decided to suspend Iranian flights; foreign ground-handling companies refused to provide services for fear of US sanctions.
— Iraq's ambassador to Iran, Yasser Abdulzahra al-Hajjaj
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur Al Jazeera ↗
Nous contacter FAQ