International team creates 700 patient-derived cancer models to accelerate drug development

A thousand wasn't enough. We needed many more thousands.
A researcher explains why the existing cancer cell line collection failed to capture the diversity of human tumors.
Mark

Why does it matter that these are three-dimensional organoids instead of flat cell lines? What's the actual difference in how they behave?

Mimi

The structure changes everything. A flat layer of cells in a dish is convenient for the lab, but it doesn't reflect how cancer actually grows in the body—as a three-dimensional mass with internal structure, different cell types interacting, varying oxygen levels. Organoids mimic that architecture much more closely, so when you test a drug on them, you're testing it against something that actually resembles the tumor.

Mark

The source mentions they only successfully converted about one-third of the patient samples. Why did two-thirds fail?

Mimi

The culturing techniques are still being refined. Getting tumor cells to survive indefinitely in the lab while maintaining their original genetic and molecular features is genuinely difficult. Some samples just don't adapt to the growth conditions, or they change too much during the process. That's why characterization—verifying that the lab model still matches the original tumor—is so critical.

Mark

You mentioned the models come with patient data. What kind of data, exactly?

Mimi

Germline mutations—genetic variants the patient inherited from their parents. Treatment history. Demographic information. The idea is that researchers can now correlate drug responses in the lab with what actually happened to the patient clinically. You can ask: did this drug work in the organoid, and did it work in the patient? That feedback loop is powerful.

Mark

The paper mentions the Cancer Dependency Map now has information on 2,000 cancer types. That sounds like a lot, but is it enough?

Mimi

Not yet. There are hundreds of cancer subtypes, and many rare cancers are still barely represented. The researchers are explicit about this—they want to keep expanding, especially for pediatric cancers and the truly rare tumors that most labs never see. The goal is to eventually represent the full genetic and ethnic diversity of human cancer.

Mark

Who gets to use these models?

Mimi

Any researcher in the world. They're deposited at a nonprofit distributor and made freely available. That's the whole point—to democratize access to high-quality tumor models so drug development isn't limited to well-funded institutions.

  • Decades of cancer drug research have been quietly undermined by laboratory models too old, too narrow, and too genetically homogenous to reflect the true diversity of human tumors.
  • A ten-year international effort collected over 2,700 patient tumor samples from hospitals across three countries, including rare cancers that have long been invisible to preclinical science.
  • Only one-third of samples survived the technically demanding conversion into stable organoids — three-dimensional, gelatin-embedded structures that far more faithfully mimic how real tumors are built.
  • Each model now carries a full molecular passport — genomic sequences, RNA profiles, treatment histories — deposited at a global nonprofit distributor so any researcher anywhere can access them.
  • CRISPR screens on over 300 of the new models have already begun mapping which genes cancer cells depend on to survive, feeding a Cancer Dependency Map now covering more than 2,000 cancer types.
  • The consortium acknowledges 2,000 models still falls short of representing all human cancers, and work continues toward pediatric and rare tumor types still missing from the collection.

For generations, the tools scientists used to study cancer in the laboratory were blunt instruments — cell lines decades old, grown flat in dishes, bearing little resemblance to the living tumors they were meant to represent. Over the past ten years, an international consortium anchored at MIT, the Broad Institute, and Dana-Farber has quietly worked to change this, assembling nearly 700 patient-derived cancer models spanning 25 tumor types and making them freely available to researchers everywhere. The effort, published in Nature, is less a discovery than an act of collective infrastructure — the kind of unglamorous, systematic work that makes future discoveries possible. It is, as its architects suggest, not an ending but a foundation.

For decades, cancer researchers have worked with a quiet handicap: the laboratory models they depend on to test new drugs were often developed in the 1950s, grown as flat sheets of cells in petri dishes, and drawn from a narrow slice of human genetic diversity. A patient's tumor is a singular thing — shaped by genetics, environment, and history — and these aging tools captured only a fraction of that complexity.

A decade ago, an international consortium set out to close that gap. Led by researchers at MIT's Koch Institute, the Broad Institute, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and the National Cancer Institute, the effort was catalyzed by a sobering realization: even after the Cancer Genome Atlas had mapped the genetic landscape of thousands of tumors, the roughly 1,000 existing cancer cell lines failed to reflect that diversity. Most came from European and Southeast Asian patients. Rare cancers were barely present. As senior researcher Jesse Boehm put it, a thousand simply wasn't enough.

The consortium collected more than 2,700 tumor samples from hospitals in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands — common cancers like lung and pancreatic tumors alongside roughly 150 rare types, including gallbladder and small intestine cancers that rarely enter research collections. Converting these samples into usable models was painstaking work. Specialized growth media and three-dimensional scaffolds were developed, and about one-third of samples successfully became stable cell lines or organoids — structures embedded in a gelatin-like matrix that more closely mimic the architecture of real tumors. Establishing each model could take up to a year.

Every resulting model was then rigorously characterized — genomic DNA sequenced, RNA expression analyzed, epigenomic modifications examined — and deposited at the American Type Culture Collection, where they are freely available to researchers worldwide. Nearly 700 models representing 25 cancer types now form a shared global resource.

The practical returns are already accumulating. In a companion paper, Broad Institute researchers used CRISPR screens on more than 300 of the new models to map which genes cancer cells depend on for survival — vulnerability data now added to the Cancer Dependency Map, which covers more than 2,000 cancer types. Large-scale drug screening that was once impossible with limited models is now within reach.

The formal project is winding down, but its architects are clear this is not a conclusion. With particular attention still needed for pediatric and rare cancers, Boehm offered a characteristically measured hope: "I think this will hopefully be not the end, but the beginning."

For decades, cancer researchers have faced a fundamental problem: the laboratory models they use to test new drugs don't always match the tumors they're trying to treat. A patient's cancer is a unique thing—shaped by their own genetics, their environment, their history. But the cell lines scientists have relied on, many developed in the 1950s and grown as flat layers in petri dishes, capture only a fraction of that complexity. An international consortium has now spent a decade trying to fix this gap.

Led by researchers at MIT's Koch Institute, the Broad Institute, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and the National Cancer Institute, along with dozens of partner institutions, the team has created nearly 700 new cancer models derived directly from patient tumors. These models represent 25 different cancer types and are now available to researchers worldwide. The work, published today in Nature, is the result of a systematic effort to build what the field has long needed: a library of tumor samples diverse enough to reflect the actual genetic and molecular landscape of human cancer.

The project began in 2016, following the completion of the Cancer Genome Atlas—a massive effort to sequence cancer cells from thousands of patients. That work revealed something sobering: the roughly 1,000 patient-derived cancer cell lines that existed at the time didn't capture the full diversity of tumor genetics. Most came from European and Southeast Asian patients. Rare cancers were barely represented. Jesse Boehm, a senior researcher on the project, put it plainly: "We realized that a thousand wasn't enough, that the international community needed to invest in many more thousands to represent all cancers, all genotypes, all ethnicities."

The consortium collected more than 2,700 tumor samples from hospitals in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands—patients who consented to have their cells used for research. The samples included common cancers like lung, liver, and pancreatic tumors, but also about 150 rare types: gallbladder cancers, small intestine tumors, and others that rarely make it into research collections. Converting these raw samples into usable models proved technically demanding. The researchers developed specialized culturing techniques, growing cells in custom growth media and three-dimensional scaffolds. About one-third of the samples successfully became stable cell lines or organoids—three-dimensional structures of cells embedded in a gelatin-like matrix that more closely mimic the architecture of actual tumors.

Once established, which could take up to a year per model, each was rigorously characterized. Researchers sequenced the genomic DNA, analyzed RNA expression patterns, and examined epigenomic modifications to ensure the laboratory models matched the original tumors. Every model now comes with extensive data: the patient's inherited genetic mutations, information about treatments they received, and detailed molecular profiles. All of this has been deposited at the American Type Culture Collection, a nonprofit distributor, making the resource freely available to the global research community.

The practical payoff is already visible. In a companion paper also published today, Broad Institute researchers profiled more than 300 of the new models using high-throughput sequencing and CRISPR screens—a technique that systematically disables genes to identify which ones cancer cells depend on for survival. These vulnerability maps have been added to the Cancer Dependency Map, a growing database now containing information on more than 2,000 cancer types. This kind of large-scale screening, once impossible with limited models, could accelerate the identification of new drug targets and the validation of experimental treatments.

Mushriq Al-Jazrawe, scientific director of the High Throughput Sciences platform at the Koch Institute and a lead author, emphasized the scale of the undertaking: "A resource of this scale depends on the kind of systematic effort that often happens behind the scenes." The work involved hundreds of scientists across dozens of institutions, each contributing technical expertise and careful stewardship of precious patient samples.

Boehm and his colleagues are clear that this is not an endpoint. The formal HCMI project is winding down, but researchers plan to continue developing models from additional patient samples, with particular focus on pediatric cancers and rare tumors still underrepresented in the collection. "We now have about 2,000, but if we really want to represent all humans with cancer in our preclinical research, more work is needed," Boehm said. "I think this will hopefully be not the end, but the beginning."

We realized that a thousand wasn't enough, that the international community needed to invest in many more thousands to represent all cancers, all genotypes, all ethnicities.
— Jesse Boehm, Koch Institute
If we really want to represent all humans with cancer in our preclinical research, more work is needed. We have to invite patients to donate tissue to make research tools that the whole world can use.
— Jesse Boehm
Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em News-Medical ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ