Indonesia's Wildfire Crisis Chokes Southeast Asia as Blame Game Intensifies

Millions of residents in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore suffer respiratory problems and health impacts from hazardous air quality; workers like taxi drivers must continue working despite dangerous conditions.
When there is no smoke, we send oxygen.
An Indonesian official's comment on regional tensions over transboundary haze, sparking anger across Southeast Asia.
Mark

So what's actually causing these fires? Is it just the weather?

Mimi

The El Niño made it worse, yes—the dry season is fiercer. But the fires themselves are deliberate. Companies and farmers are using slash and burn to clear land for agriculture. It's illegal, but it's cheap, and enforcement has been weak.

Luke

How weak? Are we talking about a few fires slipping through, or is this systemic?

Mimi

Systematic. Over a million hotspots recorded. The government suspended 26 company licenses last month, which suggests they knew this was happening and didn't stop it until the smoke crossed borders.

Mark

And the companies themselves—are they denying involvement?

Mimi

They're denying intentional burning. First Resources says it has a zero-burning policy. Kuala Lumpur Kepong says most fires started outside their land. But Greenpeace documented dozens of haze source points on their concessions.

Luke

So we have Greenpeace's satellite data against company statements. That's not nothing, but it's not a court verdict either. What about the Indonesian government's response?

Mimi

President Prabowo called it ecological terrorism and promised tougher sanctions. But there's a history here of enforcement falling apart when it gets diplomatic.

Mark

What do you mean?

Mimi

In 2015, Singapore tried to prosecute Indonesian companies under its Transboundary Haze Pollution Act. Jakarta got angry, refused to cooperate, and the cases went nowhere. This week, an Indonesian official said Singapore should be grateful for the oxygen Indonesia sends them.

Luke

That's a real quote?

Mimi

Paraphrased, but yes. He said "when there is no smoke, we send oxygen." It went viral. People in Singapore and Malaysia were furious.

Mark

So the region is fractured over this.

Mimi

Deeply. And meanwhile, people like a 63-year-old taxi driver in Pekanbaru are breathing toxic air every day and have no choice but to keep working.

Luke

Is there any legal recourse for them?

Mimi

Civil groups filed a class action lawsuit in West Kalimantan demanding the government declare the haze a national disaster. A similar case last year was dismissed. So it's uncertain.

  • Over 1 million wildfire hotspots burned 900,000 hectares in Indonesia
  • 26 company licenses suspended by Indonesian authorities last month
  • Greenpeace identified Singapore and Malaysian companies with operations on burning Indonesian land
  • Singapore's 2014 Transboundary Haze Pollution Act enforcement attempt in 2015 triggered diplomatic backlash

Over 1 million wildfire hotspots burned 900,000 hectares in Indonesia, with hazardous air quality affecting millions across the region and forcing school closures in Malaysia. Commercial companies use illegal slash-and-burn farming as cheap land-clearing; Indonesian authorities suspended 26 company licenses, while Singapore and Malaysia face diplomatic tensions over accountability.

Indonesia faces its worst wildfire season in a decade, with toxic smog spreading across Southeast Asia. Companies accused of slash-and-burn farming and weak enforcement are blamed for the crisis.

Indonesia is burning, and the smoke is choking millions across Southeast Asia. Over the past weeks, the air above Kalimantan and Sumatra has turned a sickly amber. Schools have closed in Malaysia. Singapore's famous skyline has vanished into haze. The anger is no longer quiet. It is directed at the companies accused of setting these fires and at governments that have watched them burn.

This is Indonesia's worst wildfire season in a decade. According to Nusantara Atlas, an independent forest monitoring platform, more than one million hotspots have been recorded across the country, consuming roughly 900,000 hectares of land. The scale is staggering. The cause, in many cases, is deliberate. Companies and farmers have long used a method called slash and burn—razing vegetation to clear land for agriculture. It is cheap. It is fast. It is also illegal in Indonesia, though enforcement has been sporadic at best. This year, an unusually strong El Niño has made the dry season fiercer than normal, turning what might have been manageable fires into a regional catastrophe.

The practice itself is not new. Indonesian farmers have used slash and burn for generations to create nutrient-rich soil for crops. But what was once a small-scale agricultural technique has become something else entirely. Commercial farming operations now use fire to clear vast tracts of land, and the scale makes these blazes nearly impossible to control. Activists and government investigations have repeatedly accused major companies of treating fire as a cost-effective alternative to mechanical clearing. The Indonesian government has finally begun to respond. President Prabowo Subianto has called the practice "ecological terrorism" and demanded tougher penalties. Last month, authorities suspended the operating licenses of 26 companies linked to the fires and opened investigations into others, with promises to pursue criminal cases in court.

But the crisis has exposed something larger: the companies responsible do not all answer to Jakarta. A Greenpeace report released this month identified businesses based in Singapore and Malaysia with operations on Indonesian land where fires are burning. First Resources, a Singapore-based palm oil company, had more than 30 haze source points recorded on land managed by its two Indonesian subsidiaries between August and September. The company responded with a statement asserting its "strict zero burning policy" and robust fire prevention measures. Kuala Lumpur Kepong, a Malaysian plantation group, faced similar accusations regarding its subsidiary PT Menteng Jaya Sawit Perdana, which managed land where 19 haze source points were detected. The company claimed that most fires originated outside its concession area and have been extinguished, and stated it does not permit open burning.

The diplomatic tensions are as thick as the smoke. In 2015, when Singapore issued summonses against Indonesian companies under its Transboundary Haze Pollution Act—legislation passed in 2014 to hold firms accountable for cross-border pollution—Jakarta responded with fury. The move, officials said, damaged bilateral relations. Indonesia refused to cooperate, and Singapore authorities could not obtain the information they needed to prosecute. That same year, Indonesia's then-vice-president Jusuf Kalla made a comment that still stings: for eleven months, he said, Singapore enjoyed clean air from Indonesia without thanks, and now they complained about one month of haze. Last weekend, the wound reopened when Syahganda Nainggolan, who heads Indonesia's government communications agency, said the fires were beyond human control and reminded Singapore and Malaysia that "the oxygen in neighbouring Singapore and Malaysia also comes from our forests." He added, "When there is no smoke, we send oxygen." The video circulated widely on social media, drawing ridicule and anger from across the region.

Yet Indonesia has also apologized for the haze in the past, and this year officials have thanked Singapore and Malaysia for offering assistance, even as Jakarta has not formally requested international support. The contradiction reflects a government caught between domestic pressure and regional resentment. Inside Indonesia, civil society groups are taking matters into their own hands. In Pontianak, West Kalimantan, several organizations have filed a class action lawsuit against the Indonesian government and President Prabowo, accusing them of gross negligence over the recurring toxic haze. They are demanding that the government declare the haze a national disaster, which would unlock recovery measures including subsidized healthcare. A similar case was filed last year in South Sumatra but was dismissed.

Meanwhile, on the ground, millions of people are simply trying to survive. Imrayedi, a 63-year-old motorcycle taxi driver in Pekanbaru on Sumatra, told the BBC last week that he cannot breathe properly and suffers constant headaches from the air. But he still has to work. "The government must also think about common people like us," he said. "Please take action to find a solution so that this haze problem can be resolved immediately." His words carry the weight of a region waiting to see whether governments and companies will finally act, or whether the smoke will simply drift on, year after year, as it has before.

I'm short of breath and have a headache from breathing this air. But I still have to work. The government must also think about common people like us.
— Imrayedi, 63-year-old motorcycle taxi driver in Pekanbaru, Sumatra
We maintain a strict zero burning policy across all planting activities and implement robust fire prevention, monitoring and firefighting measures throughout our operations.
— First Resources (Singapore-based palm oil company), statement to BBC
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei BBC News ↗
Kontakt FAQ