India-US trade pact 'done and dusted,' awaits competitive advantage terms

We have to find the right comparable competitive advantage
Goyal explained why the US trade agreement, though negotiated, cannot yet be executed.
Mark

So the US deal is done, but it's not actually done. What's the holdup?

Mimi

The framework is complete—both sides agreed on the structure in February. But US tariff policy has shifted since then, so they're renegotiating the specific terms that will actually govern trade. Goyal wants to make sure India gets real competitive advantages in American markets before signing off.

Luke

But we don't know what those advantages look like yet, or how far apart they still are. The minister is saying it's ready to execute, but execution is conditional on something that hasn't been settled.

Mark

And the EU deal is different—that one actually closed?

Mimi

Yes. India secured zero-duty access for over 90 percent of its steel exports, and got USD 500 million in climate finance commitments. The minister is framing those as opening moves—he expects more money from Europe in the future.

Luke

The climate finance number is significant, but it's worth noting that's a commitment, not money already transferred. And the steel quota is real, but it's capped at 2.8 million tonnes annually under various arrangements.

Mark

Why is Goyal so focused on building all these trade agreements right now?

Mimi

Tariff uncertainty. The global trade environment is becoming less predictable, so India is trying to lock in preferential access to markets that represent about 75 percent of global GDP. It's a hedge against rising barriers elsewhere.

Luke

That's the stated strategy, but we should be clear: these agreements take years to negotiate, and the actual economic impact depends on whether Indian exporters can actually compete at scale in those markets. The agreements open doors; they don't guarantee sales.

Mark

What about the RCEP thing—why bring that up now?

Mimi

Goyal was defending India's 2019 decision to stay out of that mega-agreement. He's saying it would have primarily benefited China, since India already had deals with most other signatories.

Luke

That's his characterization. The RCEP included ten ASEAN members plus Australia, Japan, South Korea, and New Zealand—not just China. Whether staying out was the right call depends on how you weigh those relationships, and that's still debated among economists.

  • The India-US trade deal is done on paper, but India is refusing to execute until it can guarantee Indian exporters a real edge over rivals in American markets — a calculated pause that reflects how much the US tariff landscape has shifted since February.
  • Goyal heads to Milwaukee for the G20 Trade Ministerial on September 30, where a face-to-face with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will test whether both sides can close the gap between framework and reality.
  • India's EU deal delivered concrete wins — zero-duty access for over 90% of steel exports, up to 2.8 million tonnes annually, and a USD 500 million climate finance commitment — signaling that India is extracting tangible concessions, not just signing agreements.
  • A rapidly expanding FTA network — Canada moving fast after a Mumbai breakthrough, Mexico about to formally launch talks, GCC negotiations opening in October — shows India racing to lock in preferential access before tariff walls rise further.
  • Goyal's pointed defense of India's 2019 exit from RCEP reframes it as strategic foresight rather than isolationism, arguing that joining would have amounted to opening India's market primarily to China under a multilateral cover.

At a moment when global trade architecture is being redrawn by tariff uncertainty and competing regulatory regimes, India's Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal has signaled that the country's bilateral trade agreement with the United States is structurally complete — yet deliberately held in reserve until the terms can deliver a genuine competitive advantage for Indian exporters. This posture reflects not hesitation, but a broader strategic patience: India is simultaneously weaving a web of preferential agreements spanning the EU, Canada, Mexico, the Gulf, and beyond, positioning itself to access markets that together represent three-quarters of the world's economic output. The question is no longer whether India will trade on its own terms, but when the conditions will be right enough to act.

India's Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal announced Thursday that the bilateral trade agreement with the United States has been fully negotiated, but will not move to execution until India secures a genuine competitive advantage for its exporters in American markets. The first phase of the pact was completed in February, but shifts in the US tariff environment have since forced both sides back to the table to work out the terms that will actually govern trade once the deal takes effect.

Goyal is set to travel to Milwaukee for the G20 Trade Ministerial on September 30 and October 1, where he will meet US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. The India-US negotiations are expected to dominate that conversation. India has now finalized nine free trade agreements in total, with the US pact among them — but the minister has made clear that a signed framework means little without execution terms that give Indian exporters a real edge.

On the European front, India's recently concluded FTA with the EU delivered significant gains: zero-duty access for more than 90 percent of Indian steel exports, annual quota capacity of up to 2.8 million tonnes, and a USD 500 million climate finance commitment that Goyal described as the first installment of what he expects to be a longer European financial engagement. He also argued that new EU regulations like the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism would ultimately drive manufacturing toward countries like India, which offer lower regulatory burdens and stronger protections for investment.

Goyal's wider strategy is to build a preferential trade network covering roughly 75 percent of global GDP. Canada talks are accelerating after a productive meeting in Mumbai. Mexico's Terms of Reference are finalized, with India's Commerce Secretary set to formally launch negotiations there shortly. The Gulf Cooperation Council's first negotiating round is scheduled for October. Chile talks may conclude soon, while a Peru agreement appears unlikely for now given competitive pressures.

The minister also defended India's 2019 withdrawal from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, characterizing it as a sound strategic call — since India already had agreements with ASEAN, Japan, and South Korea, joining RCEP would have primarily opened India's market to China. On maritime ambitions, Goyal acknowledged India has ground to cover in becoming a global shipping hub, but pointed to ongoing regulatory reforms designed to attract more vessel registrations under the Indian flag.

India's Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal announced on Thursday that the bilateral trade agreement with the United States has been negotiated to completion, but will not move to execution until India secures what he calls the right competitive advantage in American markets. The framework for the first phase of the pact was finalized in February, but shifts in the US tariff landscape have forced both countries back to the negotiating table to work out the terms that will actually govern trade once the agreement takes effect.

Goyal's statement comes as he prepares to travel to Milwaukee, Wisconsin, for the G20 Trade Ministerial meeting scheduled for September 30 to October 1. During that visit, he will meet with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, and the progress of the India-US negotiations is expected to be a central topic. The minister framed the situation plainly: India has now finalized nine free trade agreements, with the US pact among them, but the execution phase depends on finding terms that give Indian exporters a genuine edge over their competitors in the American market.

Beyond the US agreement, Goyal highlighted significant gains India secured in its recently concluded trade negotiations with the European Union. Under the India-EU Free Trade Agreement, India has won zero-duty market access for more than 90 percent of its steel exports, with the ability to ship up to 2.8 million tonnes of steel annually under various quota arrangements. The minister also secured a USD 500 million commitment from the EU on climate finance, which he described as the opening move in what he expects will be a longer series of financial commitments from Europe. These victories came as India negotiated against new European regulations, including the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and Deforestation Regulations, which the minister argued would ultimately push manufacturing away from Europe and toward countries like India that offer lower regulatory burdens and stronger protections for intellectual property and investment.

Goyal's broader strategy reflects India's effort to build a network of preferential trade agreements that will eventually provide access to markets representing approximately 75 percent of global GDP. Negotiations with Canada are moving quickly, the minister said, after he and Canada's International Trade Minister Maninder Sidhu resolved outstanding issues during a meeting in Mumbai the previous week. Mexico's Terms of Reference for negotiations have been finalized, and India's Commerce Secretary Rajesh Agrawal is expected to travel there the following week to formally launch talks. The first round of negotiations with the Gulf Cooperation Council is scheduled for October, following the signing of the Terms of Reference in February. Discussions with Chile may conclude soon, though Goyal suggested that competitive pressures make a Peru agreement unlikely in the near term.

The minister used the occasion to defend India's 2019 decision to stay out of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, the mega free-trade agreement among ten ASEAN members and six other countries including China. Goyal characterized the RCEP as effectively an India-China trade pact, since India already had agreements with ASEAN, Japan, and South Korea at the time negotiations were underway. He argued that earlier governments had made a strategic error in even entering those talks, given that China was the primary new trading partner the agreement would have created.

On a separate front, Goyal acknowledged that India faces challenges in establishing itself as a major maritime hub, but said the government is undertaking substantial changes to its maritime regulatory infrastructure to attract more shipping companies to flag their vessels under the Indian registry. He described this effort as a work in progress, part of a larger push to make India the world's most attractive jurisdiction for maritime operations.

We have to find the right comparable competitive advantage over our competitors, so that we can quickly execute the agreement
— Piyush Goyal, Commerce and Industry Minister
When ministers get into the act, then we conclude agreements
— Piyush Goyal, on Canada negotiations
Contáctanos FAQ