In a crowded chamber of the United Nations in New York, a diplomat from India used a routine review of religious freedom to turn a spotlight on a long and bitter rivalry. The occasion was a report on funeral rights, but the reply traced older wounds: the soldiers of the 1999 Kargil war, the disputed valley of Kashmir, and the fate of minorities on both sides of a border that has never fully settled. Beneath the procedural language lies a familiar human question, whose suffering counts, and who is entitled to speak for the faithful. Reports from Sindh, where Hindu girls are said to be abducted
India Tells UN Pakistan Has No Standing to Lecture on Minority Rights
A state that cannot ensure the safety of its own minorities has no standing
Why did a debate about funeral rights turn into this?
The report was about burial rights in exceptional circumstances, and India's envoy used it to contest both the report's COVID framing and Pakistan's role in the discussion.
What was her main objection to the report?
That it seemed to place pandemic-era discrimination mostly in the Global South and left out similar tragedies in developed countries.
That's her reading of the report, though. We only have her characterisation here, not the text.
And the Kargil point?
She said Pakistan didn't accept its own soldiers' bodies in 1999, while the Indian Army buried some with military honours and Islamic rites.
Again, that's India's account, delivered in a diplomatic forum. The source offers no independent confirmation or Pakistani reply.
Does the reporting on Sindh back up her claim that minorities are shrinking?
It speaks to abductions and forced conversions, cited from The Express Tribune and UN-cited experts, but it doesn't give numbers.
Right, so the shrinking-population claim is asserted, not measured here. The Sindh reports are separate evidence on a related concern.
What happens next?
Whether the rapporteur responds, and whether Sindh's conditions draw official action.
Il Polso
- India's First Secretary Bhavika Mangalanandan accused the UN rapporteur's report of selective outrage, asking why COVID-19 discrimination was pinned on the Global South.
- The rebuke turned personal, recalling that Pakistan refused to take back its dead soldiers from Kargil while preaching about burial rites.
- Fresh reports of abductions and forced conversions of Hindu girls in Sindh have given India's counterattack a painful counterweight.
- Pakistan has offered no public answer, leaving the exchange hanging between a UN rapporteur's pending reply and calls for enforcement of minority protections.
In a crowded chamber of the United Nations in New York, a diplomat from India used a routine review of religious freedom to turn a spotlight on a long and bitter rivalry. The occasion was a report on funeral rights, but the reply traced older wounds: the soldiers of the 1999 Kargil war, the disputed valley of Kashmir, and the fate of minorities on both sides of a border that has never fully settled. Beneath the procedural language lies a familiar human question, whose suffering counts, and who is entitled to speak for the faithful. Reports from Sindh, where Hindu girls are said to be abducted and forced into conversion and marriage, give that question a sharper edge, and the record so far shows no reply from Islamabad.
At the United Nations in New York, during a dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, India's First Secretary Bhavika Mangalanandan rose to answer a report on funeral rights in exceptional circumstances. Her answer quickly became a rebuttal of Pakistan, which she accused of failing its own minorities while lecturing India on religious freedom.
She questioned why the report placed discriminatory practices during COVID-19 almost entirely in the Global South, and warned against using human suffering for political purposes. She also argued that a report about the rights of terrorists' funerals ignored the victims of terrorism. Her sharpest point concerned the 1999 Kargil conflict, when Pakistan did not accept the bodies of its own soldiers, while the Indian Army buried Pakistani soldiers with military honours and Islamic rites.
The remarks came amid renewed attention to minorities in Sindh. Participants at an interfaith dialogue in Hyderabad raised alarm over abductions, forced conversions and marriages of Hindu girls, and weak enforcement of protective laws. UN human rights experts echoed these concerns, stressing that conversion must be voluntary and that child marriage cannot meet the requirement of consent. Adolescent girls in poverty and marginalisation face abuse, trauma and stigma.
Pakistan has not publicly responded. The coming weeks will show whether the Special Rapporteur answers India's objections, and whether the reporting on Sindh leads to official action.
At the United Nations in New York, during an interactive dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, India's First Secretary at its Permanent Mission, Bhavika Mangalanandan, rose to answer a report on funeral rights in exceptional circumstances. Her statement went well beyond the report. It became a direct rebuttal of Pakistan, which she accused of failing its own minorities while presuming to lecture India on religious freedom and burial rights.
Mangalanandan began with the report itself. She questioned how it handled religious discrimination during the COVID-19 pandemic, saying it appeared to place discriminatory practices and shortcomings almost entirely in the Global South. "What benefit does a report derive by not mentioning similar tragic situations in the developed world?" she asked. She warned against turning human suffering to political use, saying that deriving political mileage from people's pain and loss should not be what special rapporteurs base their relevance on. Reports on religious freedom, she argued, should address violations impartially instead of picking incidents selectively.
She then turned to the report's position on the funeral rights of terrorists. A terrorist, she said, kills innocent people and damages the psyche of a nation. She called it telling that fervent advocacy for the rights of those who violate the right to life does not extend in the same way to the victims of terrorism.
The sharpest passage concerned the 1999 Kargil conflict. Mangalanandan called it deeply ironic that a state that did not accept the bodies of its own soldiers killed in combat there now speaks with fervour about faith, religious freedom and burials. She added a reminder: the Indian Army buried a number of Pakistani soldiers with military honours and according to Islamic rites.
She also addressed Pakistan's commentary on Jammu and Kashmir. Its obsession with the Indian Union Territory, she said, should be redirected to developments in the parts of Jammu and Kashmir it occupies illegally, and she named Rawalakot as an example. On Pakistan's own minorities she was blunt: their numbers are shrinking and their rights are regularly abused, and a state that cannot ensure their safety has no standing to lecture India.
The remarks arrived amid fresh attention to the treatment of minorities in Pakistan. The Express Tribune reported that participants at an interfaith dialogue in Hyderabad, organised by the Christian Study Circle, raised concerns about the abduction of Hindu girls, forced conversions and marriages, and weak enforcement of laws meant to protect religious minorities in Sindh. The gathering brought together political representatives, religious figures, lawyers and social activists, who called for coordinated action against religious extremism and discrimination. Former National Assembly member Neelam Kumari alleged that Hindu girls continue to face abductions and forced conversions, and said existing legal safeguards have had limited effect because they are poorly implemented.
Separately, experts cited by the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights warned that coercion and inadequate legal protections are enabling forced conversions through marriage, particularly affecting Hindu and Christian communities. They stressed that conversion must be voluntary and that child marriage undermines consent under international law. They also pointed to the vulnerability of adolescent girls in Sindh, where poverty and marginalisation can expose victims to abuse, psychological trauma and social stigma.
The source records no public response from Pakistan. What to watch is whether the Special Rapporteur answers India's criticism of the report, and whether the renewed reporting on abductions and conversions in Sindh prompts any official action.
Citazioni salienti
A state that cannot ensure the safety of its own minorities has no standing to lecture India.— Bhavika Mangalanandan, India's First Secretary at the UN
It was the Indian Army that buried a number of Pakistani soldiers with military honours and in accordance with Islamic rites.— Bhavika Mangalanandan