India Disputes US Trade Deal Claims, Defends Russian Oil Purchases

We are guided by the imperative to secure affordable energy for our 1.4 billion people
India's Ministry of External Affairs explained the country's rationale for continuing Russian oil purchases despite US pressure.
Mark

So India is saying the US mischaracterized the trade talks. What exactly did the Commerce Secretary say that set them off?

Mimi

Lutnick apparently suggested the negotiations were further apart than India wants to admit. India's response was to say they've been close to a deal multiple times since February of last year.

Luke

But we don't have Lutnick's exact words in the reporting, do we? We're getting India's version of what he said, not what he actually said.

Mimi

That's fair. The MEA called it "not accurate," but the source material doesn't give us the original remarks to compare.

Mark

And then there's this 500% tariff threat. Is that definitely coming, or is it still just a proposal?

Mimi

It's a bill in Congress that Senator Graham says Trump has approved. Graham is pushing for a bipartisan vote, possibly the following week.

Luke

So it's approved by Trump but not yet law. And it specifically targets India, China, and Brazil on Russian oil purchases.

Mimi

Right. Graham was explicit about that. He said it would give Trump leverage against those countries.

Mark

How much Russian oil does India actually buy? The reporting doesn't give us a number.

Luke

It doesn't. We know India buys it, we know it's described as "cheap," but there's no volume, no percentage of India's total energy imports. That's a gap.

Mimi

India's position is that it needs affordable energy for 1.4 billion people. That's the justification they're offering.

Mark

So India is essentially saying: we'll negotiate with you on trade, but we're not going to stop buying Russian oil just because you ask us to.

Mimi

That's the signal they're sending. They're not defiant, but they're not yielding either.

Luke

And we don't know if Modi and Trump have discussed this directly. The reporting says they've spoken on "different aspects" of the partnership, but it doesn't say whether the Russian oil issue came up in those calls.

  • India's Ministry of External Affairs publicly contradicted the US Commerce Secretary, insisting the two countries have come close to a bilateral trade deal multiple times — a rare and pointed diplomatic correction.
  • Senator Lindsey Graham announced that President Trump has backed legislation imposing tariffs as high as 500% on countries buying Russian oil, with India, China, and Brazil named explicitly as targets.
  • New Delhi refused to retreat on Russian oil purchases, framing them not as a geopolitical choice but as an economic lifeline for a population of 1.4 billion people who depend on affordable energy.
  • The proposed Sanctioning of Russia Act of 2025 could come to a bipartisan vote within days, compressing the window for India to navigate between its energy needs and its export relationship with the US.
  • The broader India-US partnership — built through phone calls between Modi and Trump and rounds of trade talks — now risks fracturing over the intersection of energy policy and tariff leverage.

In the long and complicated dance between sovereign necessity and geopolitical alliance, India has stepped forward to correct the record — insisting it has repeatedly neared a trade agreement with Washington, even as the United States threatens sweeping tariffs to punish New Delhi for buying Russian oil. At stake is not merely commerce, but the energy security of 1.4 billion people and the terms on which a rising power will accept the pressures of a unipolar moment. The standoff between India and the United States reveals how economic interdependence and strategic independence can pull a relationship in opposite directions at once.

New Delhi pushed back firmly on Friday against what it characterized as a misrepresentation of its trade relationship with Washington. Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, speaking at a weekly press briefing, said India and the United States have come close to a bilateral trade agreement on multiple occasions since committing to negotiations in February of the previous year — a direct rebuttal to recent remarks by US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick suggesting talks had stalled.

The timing was pointed. Senator Lindsey Graham had just announced that President Trump approved a bipartisan sanctions bill — the Sanctioning of Russia Act of 2025 — that would impose tariffs as high as 500% on goods from countries purchasing Russian oil. Graham named India, China, and Brazil as the bill's primary targets, framing the measure as leverage to cut off what he called cheap Russian oil financing Putin's war in Ukraine. A vote could come as early as the following week.

India's response was measured but unyielding. Jaiswal said New Delhi is monitoring the legislation closely, but he reaffirmed that India's energy sourcing decisions are driven by the practical necessity of securing affordable fuel for 1.4 billion people — not by geopolitical alignment. He made no apology for continued purchases of Russian crude.

The episode lays bare a deeper tension in the India-US relationship. Despite frequent calls between Modi and Trump and what both governments describe as a broad strategic partnership, trade negotiations have not produced an agreement, and Washington is now reaching for tariff threats to reshape Indian energy policy. India's frustration with the pace of talks is evident, as is its unwillingness to subordinate its energy security to American pressure. Whether the two sides can find common ground before the sanctions bill becomes law remains the defining question hanging over the relationship.

New Delhi pushed back hard on Friday against what it called a mischaracterization of trade talks with Washington, insisting that India and the United States have come close to a bilateral agreement on multiple occasions over the past year. The Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal made the statement at a weekly press briefing, responding to recent comments by US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick about the state of negotiations between the two countries. Jaiswal said the two nations had committed to negotiating a trade deal as far back as February of the previous year, and that both sides had held numerous rounds of talks aimed at reaching an agreement that would benefit both economies.

The timing of India's defense of its negotiating record comes as the Trump administration and its allies in Congress are moving forward with legislation that would impose steep penalties on countries that continue buying Russian oil. Senator Lindsey Graham announced this week that President Trump had approved a bipartisan sanctions bill that would allow tariffs as high as 500 percent on goods and services imported from Russia. Graham explicitly named India, China, and Brazil as countries the bill is designed to pressure, saying the tariffs would give Trump leverage to stop them from purchasing what he called cheap Russian oil that finances Putin's war effort in Ukraine.

India's response to the proposed tariff threat was measured but firm. Jaiswal acknowledged that New Delhi is aware of the bill and is monitoring it closely, but he reiterated India's long-standing position on energy sourcing. The country's decisions on where to buy oil, he said, are driven by the need to secure affordable energy for 1.4 billion people and by the realities of global energy markets. He did not back down from India's purchases of Russian crude, framing them instead as a practical necessity shaped by both economic need and geopolitical circumstance.

The standoff reflects a deeper tension in the India-US relationship. Modi and Trump have spoken by phone several times over the past year, according to the MEA, covering various aspects of what both countries describe as a wide-ranging partnership. Yet the trade negotiations that were supposed to cement that partnership have stalled, and now the United States is considering using tariff threats as a tool to reshape India's energy policy. India's insistence that it has repeatedly come close to a trade deal suggests frustration with the pace and terms of those discussions, while its defense of Russian oil purchases signals that New Delhi will not simply comply with American pressure on geopolitical grounds.

The proposed Sanctioning of Russia Act of 2025, as the bill is formally titled, would impose penalties on individuals and entities doing business with Russia, and would raise the duty rate on all Russian goods and services imported into the United States to at least 500 percent. Graham indicated the bill could come to a bipartisan vote as early as the following week, suggesting momentum behind the measure. For India, the stakes are clear: either find a way to reduce its reliance on Russian oil or face the prospect of steep tariffs on its own exports to the United States. The country has shown no sign of backing down, and the question now is whether the two sides can find common ground on trade before the tariff legislation becomes law.

On several occasions, we have been close to a deal. The characterization of these discussions, the reported remarks, is not accurate.
— Randhir Jaiswal, Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson
This bill will allow President Trump to punish those countries who buy cheap Russian oil fueling Putin's war machine.
— Senator Lindsey Graham
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en Republic World ↗
Contáctanos FAQ