In China, the AI Bubble Has Already Burst as STAR50 Index Shed 40% in Under Four Months

Forty percent gone in under four months
China's STAR50 AI and chip index has erased about US$480 billion in market value since mid-year.
Mark

Forty percent in under four months. How big is this, really?

Mimi

About US$480-billion in market value gone from the STAR50, and the broad blue-chip index is down roughly 20 percent from June highs.

Mark

And it's mostly small investors holding the bag?

Mimi

That's the picture. AI stocks are 42 percent of market cap and 57 percent of turnover, per Goldman Sachs, in a retail-dominated market. Unitree was 8,000 times oversubscribed by retail buyers and has since halved.

Luke

Worth saying that nobody can point to a single cause. The report says there was no obvious trigger. Traders cite high prices, tax bills, and the possibility of equipment bans. Those are traders' explanations, not established ones.

Mark

Chen Wensheng said he bought because he felt the state was behind these companies. Does that matter?

Mimi

It does. Unitree had state-backed funds as investors, and he read that as support. Now frustration may push people into defensive assets and slow fundraising by tech firms.

Luke

But that's his perception of official support. The source doesn't say Beijing promised anything. And the claim that fundraising will slow is a likelihood, not something already measured.

Mark

Is everyone gloomy?

Mimi

No. Goldman has Innolight and CXMT on its recommendation list, BNP's William Bratton sees opportunities for the careful, and HSBC says Asia funds remain overweight China.

Luke

Though the STAR50 is still near 100 times trailing earnings versus about 30 for the Nasdaq 100. Whether that means more downside is opinion. Some investors fear it. Nobody knows.

Mimi

And the regulator hasn't answered questions yet, so Beijing's response is still unknown.

  • The STAR50 has plunged about 40 per cent in under four months, wiping out roughly US$480 billion and turning a celebrated rally into a rout.
  • Small retail investors, who dominate the AI trade, are nursing steep losses, with Unitree halved since listing and optical makers down about 60 per cent.
  • Beijing's 'slow bull' ambitions are colliding with the speculative frenzy it helped ignite, as regulators weigh curbs on leverage and reconsider the market's structure.
  • Fears of U.S. bans on Chinese equipment and worries about AI demand keep sellers active, and some analysts warn the selloff could deepen before valuations reset.
  • Bargain hunters such as Goldman Sachs and BNP Paribas see opportunity, but many mainland investors are waiting on lower prices or turning to other sectors.

In the span of less than four months, China's STAR50 index, the mainland's emblem of artificial intelligence and chip-making ambition, has surrendered forty per cent of its value, erasing roughly US$480 billion. The fall reaches past one index into a two-year rally that began with the promise of stimulus, and it has unsettled Beijing's hope of building a steadier, slower market that rewards patient savers rather than speculative fever. Here the story is less about a single crash than about a national dream of technological destiny meeting the ordinary investor's disappointment and the unforgiving logic of valuation.

China's STAR50 index, the mainland benchmark for artificial intelligence and semiconductor leaders, has lost 40 per cent of its value in less than four months. Roughly US$480 billion has vanished, and the broader blue-chip index is down about 20 per cent from its June highs. The slide has ended a two-year rally that began when promises of economic stimulus sent shares soaring, and it has stalled Beijing's effort to build a steadier "slow bull" market. A Beijing fund manager described the period as a speculative frenzy that is now bursting.

The damage falls hardest on small investors, who make up much of the market. Unitree, whose August listing was oversubscribed 8,000 times by retail buyers, has halved. Chip maker CXMT has lost more than a quarter of its value in a month, and optical component makers Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink are down about 60 per cent. Chen Wensheng, a small business owner in Hainan, bought in because the names carried official backing, and now he and his friends are sitting on losses. Analysts expect that frustration to push investors toward defensive assets and to slow tech fundraising.

No single trigger explains the fall. Traders cite stretched valuations, tax concerns, and the possibility that the United States or other countries will bar Chinese equipment from their data centres, along with doubts about AI demand. Valuations remain high, with the STAR50 near 100 times trailing earnings against about 30 for the Nasdaq 100, so some fear further declines before a recovery.

The selloff cuts against regulators' stated goals of curbing leverage and volatility. Some industry voices argue that heavy weighting of tech in major indexes has distorted capital flows and created a bubble. Others see the correction as a healthy reset. Bargain hunters at Goldman Sachs and BNP Paribas see opportunity, while many mainland investors are waiting for lower prices or looking elsewhere. Whether valuations fall far enough to draw buyers, and whether U.S. restrictions deepen, will shape what comes next.

In less than four months, China's STAR50 index, the mainland benchmark for artificial intelligence and semiconductor leaders, has lost 40 per cent of its value. Roughly US$480-billion in market value is gone. While tech shares elsewhere in the world wobble, China's AI trade has already broken.

The damage reaches well beyond the index. China's broad blue-chip index is down about 20 per cent from its June highs. The slide has halted a rally that ran for two years, since promises of economic stimulus sent shares soaring. It has also stalled Beijing's attempt to break the country's old boom-and-bust pattern and build what officials call a "slow bull" market that delivers steady returns. Beijing-based fund manager Dong Baozhen put it bluntly: the market turned into a "speculative crazy bull," and now the bubble is bursting.

The contrast with the United States is sharp. American AI stocks have led a 6 per cent drawdown in the Nasdaq from a record high set three weeks ago, which the report likens to a mere prick next to China's fall. There was no obvious trigger for the selling. Traders pointed to high prices, tax bills, and the risk that the U.S. or other countries might ban Chinese equipment from their data centres. Worries about AI demand and curbs on Chinese exports have weighed on sentiment too.

The pain is widely shared. According to Goldman Sachs, AI stocks make up 42 per cent of China's market capitalization and 57 per cent of turnover across mainland A-shares and Hong Kong H-shares, and small investors dominate that market. Robot-maker Unitree, whose listing in August was 8,000 times oversubscribed by retail buyers, has halved since it began trading. Chip maker CXMT has lost more than a quarter of its value in the past month. MetaX Integrated Circuits and Moore Threads Technology, which jumped 700 per cent and 400 per cent on their debuts last year, have both halved since July. Optical parts makers Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink Technology are down about 60 per cent from their June and July highs, partly because Washington is moving toward barring them from supplying U.S. data centres.

Chen Wensheng, a small business owner and investor from Hainan in southern China, bought in because he saw official backing for names like Unitree, which counted state-backed funds among its investors. He and his friends are now sitting on losses. That frustration, with a Beijing-backed theme ending so badly, has pushed many investors toward defensive assets and is likely to slow equity fundraising by tech firms. Hong Hao, managing partner and chief investment officer at Lotus Asset Management in Hong Kong, said the rout will stop many companies trying to list.

Valuations are still steep. The STAR50 trades at around 100 times trailing earnings, down from a peak near 250, against about 30 for the Nasdaq 100, and some investors fear the selloff could worsen before it improves.

The episode cuts against authorities' stated aims. They have been cracking down on leverage and high-frequency trading to improve returns and dampen volatility, and state-backed investors sold into rallies to hold gains in check. The China Securities Regulatory Commission did not immediately reply to questions faxed by Reuters last week. Its chairman, Wu Qing, met market participants earlier this month to hear suggestions on improving capital markets, according to the regulator's website. Some in the industry say the boom damaged market structure. Leo Wang of Beijing-based Qianchuang Capital argued that overweighting tech in major indexes distorts capital behaviour, creating a severe bubble in some sectors and a serious drain on others.

Not everyone is bearish. Some see the selloff as neither surprising nor harmful to long-term reforms that have lifted returns, particularly income, in recent years. Asia funds have been sellers over the past three months but remain overweight China, according to HSBC research. Goldman Sachs put Innolight and CXMT among dozens of Chinese AI stocks on a revamped recommendation list earlier this month, and BNP Paribas Securities strategist William Bratton has called the market a buying opportunity for the careful. On the mainland, though, many are eyeing other sectors or waiting for lower valuations. Shanghai fund manager Wang Zhuo of Zhuozhu Investment Management expects chipmakers and AI suppliers to end up in a price war like other Chinese manufacturers. "All bubbles inevitably burst," he said.

What to watch: whether valuations fall far enough to draw buyers, and whether U.S. restrictions on Chinese equipment deepen.

All bubbles inevitably burst.
— Wang Zhuo, partner at Shanghai Zhuozhu Investment Management
The stock market later evolved into a speculative crazy bull, and now we see the bubble bursting.
— Dong Baozhen, Beijing-based fund manager
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei The Globe and Mail ↗
Kontakt FAQ