Ice lorry driver admits to breaking into Nadi centres, destroying evidence

He broke in, stole the evidence, then destroyed it to cover his tracks
Rimow's pattern of burglary followed by deliberate evidence tampering demonstrated calculated obstruction of justice.
Mark

Why would an ice lorry driver target these particular centres? What was he after?

Mimi

The Nadi facilities store surveillance equipment—CCTV decoders, the kind of hardware that has resale value. He wasn't stealing for personal use; he was taking equipment he could move. The pattern suggests he knew what he was looking for.

Mark

And the evidence destruction—that's almost more damning than the theft itself, isn't it?

Mimi

Exactly. By dumping the decoders just days after his arrest, he was trying to erase the trail. It shows consciousness of guilt, and it shows he understood what investigators would be looking for. The court sees that as deliberate obstruction.

Mark

The concurrent sentencing—does that feel lenient to you?

Mimi

It depends on perspective. He admitted to everything, which saved the court time and the state resources. The magistrate could have stacked the sentences. But twelve months from arrest means he might walk free in less than a year with remission. For three separate break-ins and evidence tampering, some would argue that's merciful.

Mark

What does this say about security at these information centres?

Mimi

That's the question nobody's asking in the courtroom. If one person could break into three separate Nadi facilities, there's a vulnerability somewhere—locks, alarms, patrols. The theft happened; the evidence destruction happened. The system didn't stop him until he was already arrested.

  • Between May and December 2025, three government information centers in Johor were breached in the dead of night, their equipment stripped away by the same pair of hands.
  • Rather than stopping at theft, Rimow disposed of stolen CCTV decoders across two roadside locations just days after his arrest, a calculated attempt to blind investigators to the full scope of his actions.
  • Police arrested him on December 27, and within days the evidence-destruction charges compounded the burglary charges, painting a portrait of someone who understood exactly what he had done.
  • Standing before magistrate Nurhafiza Haron with no defence offered, Rimow accepted all five charges — a moment of accountability that shaped the sentencing that followed.
  • Though the charges carried a combined potential of years behind bars, concurrent sentencing reduced his actual time to twelve months from arrest, with the possibility of early release still on the table.

In the quiet corridors of public information centers across Johor, a man whose livelihood depended on the cold chain of commerce found himself drawn into a different kind of transaction — one of theft, concealment, and eventual reckoning. Muhammad Haziq Elvy Rimow, a 43-year-old ice lorry driver, admitted before the Pontian Magistrate's Court to breaking into three National Information Dissemination Centre facilities between May and December 2025, and then attempting to erase the evidence of his actions. His guilty plea and the concurrent sentencing that followed speak to the quiet machinery of accountability — imperfect, measured, but present.

On a Thursday morning in early January, Muhammad Haziq Elvy Rimow stood before the Pontian Magistrate's Court and admitted to five crimes. The 43-year-old ice lorry driver had broken into three National Information Dissemination Centre facilities across Johor over the course of seven months, stealing equipment and later attempting to destroy evidence of his actions.

The first break-in occurred on the night of May 15, 2025, at a Nadi centre in Kukup. Seven months later, in early December, he struck a second facility in Taman Nilam around 2am, and three weeks after that, on Christmas night, he forced his way into a third centre near Sungai Pinggan. Each successive charge carried heavier potential penalties under the Penal Code.

The story did not end with the burglaries. On December 29 — two days after his arrest — Rimow disposed of stolen CCTV decoders belonging to two other Nadi facilities, dumping them at separate roadside locations in Parit Pasir and Kayu Ara Pasong. The act of discarding surveillance equipment was itself a criminal offense: deliberate obstruction of an ongoing investigation.

Represented by a lawyer from the National Legal Aid Foundation, Rimow offered no defence and accepted responsibility for all five charges. Magistrate Nurhafiza Haron sentenced him to six months for the first charge and twelve months each for the remaining four, but ordered all sentences to run concurrently. From the date of his December 27 arrest, Rimow would serve twelve months in total — with the possibility of early release through standard remission provisions.

Muhammad Haziq Elvy Rimow walked into the Pontian Magistrate's Court on a Thursday morning in early January and admitted to five crimes. The 43-year-old ice lorry driver had broken into three separate National Information Dissemination Centre facilities across Johor, stealing equipment and then destroying evidence to cover his tracks. He pleaded guilty to all charges before magistrate Nurhafiza Haron.

The first break-in happened on the night of May 15, 2025, at a Nadi centre located in Balai Raya Bandar Permas in Kukup. Rimow forced his way in around 11:31pm with the intention of committing theft. That charge carried a maximum penalty of six months in jail or a fine of up to 3,000 ringgit. Seven months later, on December 6, he struck again—this time at a Nadi facility in Taman Nilam where valuable equipment was stored. He broke in around 2am. This second burglary fell under a more serious provision of the Penal Code, one that could result in three years imprisonment or a fine reaching 5,000 ringgit. Three weeks after that, on December 25, Rimow broke into a third Nadi centre near Sungai Pinggan at Batu 1, just after midnight. That charge carried the heaviest potential sentence: up to five years in prison.

But the break-ins were only part of the story. On December 29, Rimow disposed of stolen CCTV decoders that belonged to Nadi facilities in Parit Sapran and Peladang Pekan Nanas. He dumped the equipment in two separate locations—once near Jalan Sawah in Parit Pasir and again on Jalan Parit Sikom in Kayu Ara Pasong—between noon and 1pm that day. The deliberate destruction of this surveillance equipment was itself a crime: evidence tampering, an attempt to obstruct whatever investigation might follow.

Police arrested Rimow on December 27, just two days before he disposed of the stolen decoders. When he appeared in court, he offered no defence. He accepted responsibility for all five charges. The prosecutor, deputy public prosecutor Anis Sahira Rosley, presented the case. Rimow was represented by Zulyatie Awang, a lawyer from the National Legal Aid Foundation.

Magistrate Nurhafiza sentenced him to six months imprisonment for the first charge and twelve months for each of the remaining four charges. However, she ordered all sentences to run concurrently—meaning they would overlap rather than stack end-to-end. From the date of his arrest on December 27, Rimow would serve twelve months total, not the eighteen months that might have resulted from consecutive sentencing. The decision left open the possibility of early release through remission, a standard provision in Malaysian criminal procedure.

He pleaded guilty to all five charges
— Court record, Pontian Magistrate's Court
Vuoi la storia completa? Leggi l'originale su The Star ↗
Contattaci Domande frequenti