ICE arrests of non-criminals hit record high as White House pushes 2,000-per-day target

Immigrants arrested without criminal records face detention and potential deportation; two immigrants were killed by federal agents during traffic stops in Maine.
Only 4 percent had violent crime convictions, contradicting official messaging.
The administration claims to target dangerous criminals, but data shows the vast majority arrested have no criminal record.
Mark

So the White House says they're going after the worst criminals, but the numbers show something different?

Mimi

Right. They say they're focused on violent offenders, but violent criminals are only 4 percent of the people arrested. The rest are people whose only violation is being in the country illegally.

Mark

And they're blaming sanctuary cities for forcing them to cast a wider net?

Mimi

That's what they claim, but the data contradicts it. Street arrests actually went up more in places that cooperate with ICE than in sanctuary cities. Florida and Texas saw three or four times more arrests than before.

Mark

So the enforcement is spreading beyond the places they say are the problem?

Mimi

Exactly. And it's happening through traffic stops, airport checks, routine encounters—not the big organized raids you might expect. It's become much more diffuse.

Mark

What about the local police involvement? Are they being asked to do more?

Mimi

Significantly more. The administration is expanding these 287(g) agreements where local cops can make immigration arrests. They've got deals with over 1,800 agencies now and they're funding it heavily—more than a billion dollars through 2027.

Mark

So this is becoming embedded in regular policing?

Mimi

That's the direction it's heading. And there have already been deaths. Two immigrants were killed by federal agents during traffic stops. That's raising serious questions about how this enforcement is actually playing out on the ground.

  • The administration's own data contradicts its public messaging — violent offenders account for just 4% of July arrests, while officials continue to invoke the phrase 'worst of the worst.'
  • Two immigrants were killed by federal agents during traffic stops in Maine, intensifying public alarm over the expanding tactics used to meet arrest quotas.
  • Street arrests surged 50% in non-sanctuary jurisdictions, with Florida cities like Jacksonville and Miami seeing arrests multiply three to six times over previous monthly averages.
  • The administration is deepening its reach through 287(g) agreements with over 1,850 local agencies, backed by $1.15 billion in funding through 2027, embedding immigration enforcement into everyday policing.
  • Officials argue that those labeled 'non-criminal' may still pose threats abroad, but provided no supporting evidence when pressed — leaving the claim unverified and the policy contested.

In July 2026, Immigration and Customs Enforcement reached a historic threshold: for the first time under the current administration, people with no criminal record comprised the majority of those arrested each day — more than 800 of the 1,580 daily detentions. The gap between the administration's stated mission of targeting dangerous offenders and the reality documented in federal data raises enduring questions about the relationship between enforcement rhetoric and enforcement practice. As the White House presses toward 2,000 daily arrests, the human cost is being distributed across communities far removed from the borders and courtrooms where immigration policy is typically debated.

Federal data released this week shows that ICE arrested more than 800 people per day in July who had no criminal record — a record high, and the first month in President Trump's second term where civil immigration violators outnumbered those with criminal histories among those detained. The agency's overall daily arrest average reached 1,580, also a record under the current administration.

The surge is driven by an explicit White House directive to reach 2,000 daily arrests, following a period of reduced enforcement after public backlash, a funding dispute, and leadership changes at DHS. But the composition of those arrests tells a different story than officials have offered publicly. Despite repeated claims of targeting 'the worst of the worst,' data compiled by the Deportation Data Project at UC Berkeley and UCLA shows violent offenders represent only about 4% of July arrests and roughly 6% of all detentions under the current administration. DHS suggested some of those counted as non-criminals may have committed offenses abroad, but offered no evidence when asked.

The geographic data further undermines the administration's justification that sanctuary cities force broader enforcement. Street arrests rose 50% in non-sanctuary jurisdictions between June and July — compared to 27% in sanctuary cities. Florida, which mandates local cooperation with ICE, saw nearly four times as many street arrests as in prior months. Jacksonville's monthly arrests jumped from 18 to 166; Miami's from 115 to 715. Texas cities including El Paso and Austin saw arrests triple. Even some sanctuary cities recorded sharp increases.

Rather than large publicized raids, enforcement has relied on traffic stops, airport apprehensions, and immigration check-in arrests. Two immigrants were killed by federal agents during traffic stops in Maine, reigniting outcry over tactics. Nearly half of all June and July arrests — at least 45,300 people — occurred in communities rather than jails. The administration is also rapidly expanding 287(g) agreements, now active with more than 1,850 local agencies and backed by $1.15 billion in federal funding through September 2027, signaling that this level of enforcement is not a temporary surge but a structural shift.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrested more than 800 people per day in July without any criminal record, according to federal data released this week. That figure represents a record high for the agency and marks the first month in President Trump's second term when people facing only civil immigration violations—not criminal charges or convictions—made up the majority of those taken into custody. The average daily arrest total for July reached 1,580 people, also the highest under the current administration.

The surge reflects an explicit White House directive. The administration has set a target of 2,000 ICE arrests per day, and the agency is moving aggressively to meet it. The push comes after a period of reduced enforcement following public backlash to a Department of Homeland Security operation in Minneapolis, a funding dispute, and leadership changes within the department. This summer, the agency ramped up its efforts significantly.

Yet the composition of those arrests tells a different story than the one administration officials have been telling the public. Officials have repeatedly characterized their enforcement strategy as targeting "the worst of the worst"—immigrants with serious criminal histories. The data, obtained by the Deportation Data Project at UC Berkeley and UCLA, shows something else: only about 4 percent of those arrested in July had convictions for violent crimes as defined by the Justice Department. Across the entire current administration, violent offenders represent roughly 6 percent of all ICE detentions. A DHS spokesperson responded by arguing that many people counted as "non-criminals" may have committed serious offenses abroad or pose security threats, though the agency did not provide evidence of such crimes when asked by CBS News.

The geographic pattern of arrests reveals another disconnect. White House border czar Tom Homan and Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin have both argued that so-called sanctuary cities—jurisdictions that limit cooperation between local police and ICE—force the agency to cast a wider net and arrest anyone they encounter living in the country illegally. Yet the data shows the opposite. Street arrests in sanctuary jurisdictions increased 27 percent between June and July compared to the previous six months. Everywhere else, they increased 50 percent. In Florida, where state law requires local law enforcement to work with ICE, federal agents made nearly four times as many street arrests in June and July as they had averaged in the prior six months. Jacksonville saw monthly arrests jump from 18 to 166. Miami went from 115 per month to 715.

Texas, another state without sanctuary protections, experienced similar surges. Arrests in El Paso and Austin tripled. Even some sanctuary cities saw dramatic increases: San Ysidro, California, near the border, recorded six times more arrests in June and July than in previous months. Denver and Newark both saw arrests double. The enforcement has proceeded without the large, publicized raids of previous crackdowns. Instead, agents have relied on traffic stops, airport arrests, and apprehensions at immigration check-ins. Two immigrants were killed by federal agents during traffic stops in Maine and elsewhere, reigniting public outcry over the tactics.

Nearly half of all ICE arrests in June and July—at least 45,300 people—occurred in communities rather than in jails or prisons. An additional 12,700 came through 287(g) agreements, formal arrangements that authorize local law enforcement to make immigration arrests. The administration is expanding this program significantly. ICE now has 287(g) agreements with more than 1,850 city, county, and state agencies, a number that grows each month. The Department of Homeland Security has allocated $1.15 billion toward the program through September 2027, signaling a long-term commitment to deepening local police involvement in federal immigration enforcement.

ICE enforces the law as written. What makes someone a target for immigration enforcement is whether or not they are illegally in the U.S.
— DHS spokesperson
Let's work to get the worst of the worst off the streets and then you won't see me in your cities and states like you do as much.
— Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin
Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em CBS News ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ