In a Sydney hearing room, the machinery of democratic accountability turned slowly against the Liberal Party's hard-right Reformers faction, as the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption continued its examination of whether political appointments and removals were traded for donations. A central allegation against former minister David Elliott collapsed under cross-examination, yet the deeper questions — about fugitive developer Jean Nassif, the fate of building commissioner David Chandler, and money flowing through factional networks — remained very much alive. These proceedings remind
ICAC witness concedes Elliott affair claim unfounded as inquiry probes Reformers
I would accept that no such affair occurred.
So a witness just admitted the central claim against Elliott was false. Does that mean the whole case falls apart?
Not at all. Elliott's vindication on the affair claim is actually a small piece of a much larger investigation. The real focus is on whether donations from a fugitive developer were used to secure ministerial favors—specifically, getting the building commissioner removed.
And did that happen? Did they get him removed?
That's what the commission is trying to figure out. The building commissioner did resign, but only after an investigation that cleared him of wrongdoing. The question is whether that investigation was weaponized—whether someone in government orchestrated it to make him go away.
You mentioned a video. What was in it?
Whitelaw never saw it, so we only know what he was told. Allegedly it contained accusations that the commissioner was racist, and it referenced a list of developers he'd flagged to banks. It was supposed to be used as ammunition during budget estimates to embarrass him.
And the federal opposition leader—Taylor—is he implicated?
Messages suggest he offered to donate money to this faction. But he denies it. The timing is interesting though: the amounts discussed match increases in payments to a lobbying firm around the same time. Whether that's coincidence or coordination, nobody knows yet.
So the Reformers are basically a faction within the Liberal Party that's being investigated for corruption?
Yes. They're described as the hard-right faction. The inquiry is examining whether they operated almost like a separate political machine—taking money from developers in exchange for government outcomes.
And this is all coming out now because of one investigation?
One investigation, but it's sprawling. It touches multiple ministers, multiple appointments, multiple alleged payments. Each piece of testimony either confirms or undermines the larger picture.
Le Pouls
- A key accusation against David Elliott — that he had an extramarital affair while his wife underwent cancer treatment — fell apart when the witness admitted he had never seen any evidence and that the timeline was simply wrong.
- The inquiry is probing whether Jean Nassif's boast that he had paid for building commissioner David Chandler's removal was wishful thinking or a window into actual coordination — a distinction with serious consequences for multiple political careers.
- Chandler resigned in July 2022 after an investigation requested by the minister Nassif had described as 'gonna be one of my girls,' and though Chandler was later cleared, the sequence of events is now under the commission's microscope.
- Messages suggesting federal opposition leader Angus Taylor discussed payments of $15,000 and $3,000 monthly to the Reformers have surfaced, with a suspicious timing overlap between an alleged commitment and a lobbying firm's retainer increase — Taylor denies any payments were made.
- The hearing closed with no named accusations against Spence, Perrottet, or Petinos, but the unresolved questions about who knew what and who paid whom continue to cast a long shadow over the NSW Liberal Party.
In a Sydney hearing room, the machinery of democratic accountability turned slowly against the Liberal Party's hard-right Reformers faction, as the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption continued its examination of whether political appointments and removals were traded for donations. A central allegation against former minister David Elliott collapsed under cross-examination, yet the deeper questions — about fugitive developer Jean Nassif, the fate of building commissioner David Chandler, and money flowing through factional networks — remained very much alive. These proceedings remind us that the distance between political ambition and corruption is often measured not in ideology but in the paper trails left behind.
Inside Operation Rosny, one of the inquiry's central accusations crumbled on Tuesday. Witness Dylan Whitelaw, questioned about alleged misconduct within the Liberal Party's hard-right Reformers faction, conceded under cross-examination that former minister David Elliott had not had an extramarital affair — despite the claim appearing in a factional document bluntly titled the 'David Elliott shit sheet.' The alleged affair was said to have occurred during pandemic lockdowns, but when pressed, Whitelaw acknowledged the cancer treatment referenced in the story had actually taken place in 2012, and that he had never seen any photograph. When Elliott's lawyer suggested directly that no affair had occurred, Whitelaw simply agreed.
Elliott responded with a statement rejecting accusations from what he called 'the young boy, Dylan, and his colleagues on the religious right,' describing himself as a devoted husband of thirty years and signalling his willingness to testify before the commission.
The hearing's broader terrain remained unsettled. The inquiry is examining whether Reformers members solicited donations from fugitive property developer Jean Nassif in exchange for political favours — specifically, the removal of building commissioner David Chandler. Whitelaw testified about a 2022 incident in which a chief of staff allegedly planned to hand a damaging video of Chandler to a minister for use during budget estimates. Whether the plan succeeded was unclear; Whitelaw recalled the chief of staff later walking in frustrated, saying the minister had 'fucked it up.'
Two months after a phone call in which Nassif allegedly boasted that 'the fair trading minister is gonna be one of my girls,' Premier Dominic Perrottet appointed that very minister in a reshuffle. Chandler resigned months later following an investigation she had requested, though he was subsequently cleared. The commission must now determine whether Nassif's words reflected coordination or mere coincidence.
Separately, messages read into the record suggested federal opposition leader Angus Taylor had discussed a one-off payment of $15,000 and a monthly donation of $3,000 to the Reformers with Catholic Schools NSW. Taylor denied making any such payments. The timing was nonetheless suggestive: a lobbying firm linked to the Reformers saw its retainer from Catholic Schools NSW increase in the same month the alleged commitment was discussed. The hearing closed with those questions — about knowledge, payments, and whether government machinery was bent to factional ends — still unanswered.
Inside the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption's Operation Rosny hearing, a central accusation crumbled on Tuesday. Dylan Whitelaw, a witness being questioned about alleged misconduct within the Liberal Party's hard-right Reformers faction, conceded under cross-examination that former minister David Elliott had not engaged in an extramarital affair—despite claims circulating in a document the Reformers had titled, bluntly, the "David Elliott shit sheet."
The alleged affair was said to have occurred during pandemic lockdowns, with Elliott supposedly photographed leaving another woman's home while his wife underwent cancer treatment. But when Elliott's lawyer, Bruce Levet, pressed Whitelaw on the details, the witness's account unraveled. The cancer treatment, Whitelaw acknowledged, had actually taken place in 2012—years before the lockdowns. He had never seen any photograph. No one had ever shown him one. When Levet suggested directly that no such affair had occurred, Whitelaw simply agreed. "I would accept that," he said.
Elliott responded swiftly with a statement rejecting what he called accusations from "the young boy, Dylan, and his colleagues on the religious right of the Liberal Party." He described himself as a devoted husband of thirty years and expressed frustration that his wife had been dragged into the dispute despite her sacrifices for the party. He signaled his willingness to testify before the commission if invited.
Yet the hearing's broader landscape remained turbulent. The inquiry is investigating whether members of the Reformers solicited or accepted donations from fugitive property developer Jean Nassif in exchange for political favors—specifically, the removal of building commissioner David Chandler. Whitelaw testified about an incident in 2022 when Christopher Spence, chief of staff to then-planning minister Anthony Roberts, claimed to possess a damaging video of Chandler. Spence allegedly planned to hand the video to fair trading minister Eleni Petinos for use during budget estimates, with the stated goal of discrediting Chandler. Whitelaw said he never saw the video, which he understood contained allegations that Chandler was racist and referenced a list of developers or certifiers the commissioner had flagged to banks.
Whether Spence's plan succeeded remained unclear. Whitelaw recalled a later conversation in which Spence walked into the office frustrated, saying something to the effect of: "I can't believe it, Eleni fucked it up." Two months after the alleged phone call in which Nassif claimed he had paid for Chandler's removal and boasted that "the fair trading minister is gonna be one of my girls," Premier Dominic Perrottet appointed Petinos to that very position in a reshuffle. Chandler resigned in July 2022 following an investigation Petinos had requested; he was later cleared of wrongdoing. The commission will need to determine whether Nassif's words were mere wishful thinking that happened to align with events, or evidence of actual coordination.
Separately, the inquiry heard testimony about purported payments from federal opposition leader Angus Taylor to the Reformers. Messages read into the record yesterday suggested Taylor had agreed with Catholic Schools NSW CEO Dallas McInerney to make a one-off payment of fifteen thousand dollars and a monthly donation of three thousand dollars. Taylor denied making any such payments. When counsel assisting Juliet Curtin asked Whitelaw whether the monthly amount Taylor allegedly offered bore any connection to a corresponding increase in what Catholic Schools NSW was paying to Beckington—a Reformer-controlled lobbying firm—Whitelaw said he could not speak to that. The timing, however, was suggestive: the increase in Beckington's retainer from Catholic Schools NSW occurred in March 2021, the same month the alleged Taylor commitment was discussed.
Neither Spence, Perrottet, nor Petinos has been named in any allegations or accused of wrongdoing. Liberal leader Kellie Sloane said she had checked in on Petinos, who is on maternity leave, and has not asked her to step aside from the shadow cabinet during the inquiry. The hearing concluded for the day with these questions still hanging in the air—questions about who knew what, who paid whom, and whether the machinery of government was bent to serve factional interests.
Citations marquantes
I reject all the accusations made by the young boy, Dylan, and his colleagues on the religious right of the Liberal Party. As most of Sydney knows I'm a devoted husband of 30 years to a beautiful woman who doesn't deserve to be treated like this.— Former NSW Liberal minister David Elliott, in a statement
I can't believe it, Eleni fucked it up— Christopher Spence, chief of staff to then-planning minister Anthony Roberts, allegedly said to Dylan Whitelaw