How Measles Came Roaring Back in a Single Generation, Pushing the US Toward Losing Elimination Status

Deadly measles outbreaks have caused deaths and driven US case counts to their highest level since the early 1990s.
"We've not seen that in this time."
Walter Orenstein said past measles outbreaks brought presidential initiatives and resources that are absent now.
Mark

Why does losing elimination status matter if measles was never fully eradicated?

Mimi

Because it marks a line. In 2000 experts concluded measles was no longer endemic. Crossing back means the virus is circulating here again, year after year.

Luke

Careful, though. It hasn't been lost yet. A closed-door committee meets this month, and the expectation is widespread but it's still an expectation.

Mark

What's the test they'll apply?

Mimi

Whether there has been sustained local transmission for at least a year.

Mark

And why will getting it back be harder?

Mimi

Janet Hamilton says the adult population used to be immune from having had measles as kids. Now some adult pockets lack protection too, so you can't just focus on children.

Luke

Worth noting that's her assessment. The article doesn't give figures on how large those adult pockets are.

Mark

What about Washington's role?

Mimi

Orenstein says past outbreaks brought presidential initiatives and resources. He says that hasn't happened now. Kennedy has doubted the MMR vaccine, and experts say that has fueled falling rates.

Luke

That's experts' view of cause and effect. The piece doesn't quantify how much his actions moved vaccination rates, and the CDC director says its outbreak response won't fundamentally change.

Mark

Is there any reason for optimism?

Mimi

Hamilton points out the vaccine already works and fewer people need vaccinating than before.

  • US measles case counts have climbed to levels not seen since the early 1990s, and deadly outbreaks are making the danger impossible to ignore.
  • A PAHO-appointed committee meets behind closed doors to decide whether a year of continuous local transmission has made measles endemic again.
  • Falling vaccination rates, shrinking public health funding, and deep distrust in science have left the country exposed.
  • Federal officials who have questioned the MMR vaccine are fueling the confusion, even as experts call for clear, unified reassurance.
  • Regaining elimination would require interrupting transmission for at least twelve months, a harder task now that adults as well as children lack immunity.

Some achievements are won once and then quietly demand to be won again. In 2000 the United States was declared to have stopped the continuous spread of measles, a victory that its health leaders received with careful humility, knowing that vigilance and high vaccination levels were the only things holding it in place. Now, after years of falling immunization rates, eroded trust, and a public health system with fewer resources, an international committee is preparing to judge whether that long-held status has slipped away. The story is less about a single outbreak than about a society learning how fragile collective protection can be when the habits that sustain it are allowed to weaken.

In March 2000, US health experts gathered and concluded that measles was no longer endemic in the country. It had not vanished entirely, but it had been brought under control, and the people who worked toward that result understood it could not last without constant care. Dr. Yvonne Maldonado, a pediatric infectious diseases specialist who attended that meeting, left with what she called cautious optimism. Infectious diseases, she believed, are never fully finished, and the work of keeping them at bay never truly ends.

That warning has now become a reality. Deadly outbreaks have pushed US case counts to their highest level since the early 1990s, and an international committee will soon consider whether measles has spread continuously for a year, which would mean the country has lost its elimination status. Experts widely expect that outcome, largely because vaccination rates have declined for years. Maldonado calls the situation tragic and entirely preventable, since two doses of a safe and effective vaccine could keep cases low.

Regaining the status will be harder than earning it the first time. Trust in science and public health remains damaged after the Covid-19 pandemic, and the population at risk has changed, since many adults now lack immunity they once had from childhood infection. Former CDC leaders note that past large outbreaks often sparked major policy action, but that has not happened this time. Federal health leadership has also cast doubt on the MMR vaccine, which medical experts say has contributed to falling rates. Still, the tools that already work remain available, and success will depend on whether the country takes this moment seriously.

In March 2000, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention convened a group of experts to talk about measles. Cases had been low for so long that the group could redefine the disease's standing in the country. Their conclusion was that measles was no longer endemic in the United States. It had not been wiped out entirely, but it was considered eliminated, and a precise definition of elimination would come later.

Dr. Yvonne Maldonado, a pediatric infectious diseases expert at Stanford University, was at that meeting representing the National Vaccine Advisory Committee. She remembers leaving with what she calls "cautious optimism." The country was doing well, she recalled, but should not rest on its laurels. With infectious diseases, she said, you can never be comfortable that the task is finished.

The committee members said much the same in their own summary, published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases in May 2004. They credited millions of parents and children, hundreds of thousands of health workers, and thousands of policy makers and legislators who supplied political and financial support. They also warned that the situation was inherently unstable. Immunization levels had to stay very high, surveillance had to be of high quality, and the US should support global measles control and work toward eventual global eradication.

Now the country is on the brink of losing the status it earned. Deadly outbreaks have pushed case counts to their highest level since the early 1990s. Authority over elimination status has since moved to an international advisory group appointed by the Pan American Health Organization, an arm of the World Health Organization. At a closed-door meeting this month, that committee will assess whether measles has spread locally and continuously in the US for at least a year, which would make it endemic again. Experts widely expect the US to lose its status, largely because vaccination rates have fallen for years.

Maldonado called the situation tragic, unnecessary and entirely preventable. Two doses of a safe and highly effective vaccine would essentially limit cases, she said, and the country is throwing that away. She argues that a culture of denial about measles has taken hold, along with vastly overstated and actively false claims about the vaccine's safety.

Regaining status is possible once the US shows that outbreak transmission has been interrupted for at least 12 months. Janet Hamilton, executive director of the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, says it will be harder than the first time. Trust in public health and in science remains low, still damaged by the Covid-19 pandemic. And the epidemiology has shifted. When the push toward elimination began, adults were immune because they had all had measles as children, so efforts could focus on vaccinating children. Now immune protection lags in some pockets of adults too, and the approach will have to be very different. The public health system is also far less funded, resourced and supported than before.

Dr. Walter Orenstein, who has led the CDC's National Immunization Program, notes that large outbreaks have typically triggered pivotal policy changes. He points to presidential initiatives that provided resources and advocacy, including the Vaccines for Children Program and the National Childhood Immunization Initiative, which encouraged school mandates and state laws promoting mass immunization. "We've not seen that in this time," he said.

CDC Director Dr. Erica Schwartz said in November that the agency will not fundamentally change its outbreak response even if elimination status is lost. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has long doubted the safety and efficacy of the MMR vaccine. He has sought to reduce the number of childhood immunizations the federal government recommends, launched a federal program focused on vaccine injuries, and given a keynote address at a conference of Children's Health Defense, the advocacy group he founded. Medical experts say his rhetoric and actions have fueled falling vaccination rates.

Dr. Jonathan Temte, who attended the 2000 meeting for the American Academy of Family Physicians and is now professor emeritus at the University of Wisconsin, says leaders at the highest levels need to state plainly that MMR is effective and safe, that its side effects are known and mild, and that it does not cause autism. Until then, he said, getting on top of this will be hard.

Hamilton still sees advantages. No new vaccine is needed, since the current one is known to work, and far fewer people need vaccinating than in the past. Advances in behavioral science on what motivates change are also available. Success, she said, depends on how earnestly the country focuses on this moment.

Regaining elimination is going to be harder for us than it was the first time.
— Janet Hamilton, Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists
It's really tragic and unnecessary, and it's all completely preventable.
— Dr. Yvonne Maldonado, Stanford University
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei Cable News Network ↗
Kontakt FAQ