On the night the votes were counted, Serbians gathered in the squares of Belgrade, Novi Sad and Niš to watch a fourteen-year political order give way. The story began more quietly in November 2024, when a concrete canopy outside the Novi Sad train station fell and killed sixteen people, and many came to read the disaster as the visible face of a corruption that had grown too comfortable. From that grief a leaderless student movement grew into a national demand for accountability, and it has now carried its moral energy into parliament through candidates who are not students themselves. What co
How a student-led movement born from the Novi Sad canopy collapse ended Aleksandar Vučić's 14 years of dominance
Born from tragedy, a leaderless movement ended 14 years of dominance
Why does it matter that none of the 250 candidates were students?
It was deliberate. The movement judged that voters probably wouldn't back people with little life experience, so it put forward professors, an actor, an opera singer, a former central bank governor.
Worth noting that's the reporting's reading of their reasoning, not a stated quote from the students.
And the result? Did they win outright?
At least 135 people on the list are thought to have won seats. Vučić conceded on Sunday night, and the SNS lost its dominance after 14 years.
"Thought to have" is the key phrase. That's an estimate, not a final tally, and it doesn't tell us whether it's a governing majority.
Who becomes prime minister?
Unclear. Dejan Šoškić's name has been mentioned, and Ilija Srdanović isn't widely seen as a likely premier.
Mentioned is not chosen. Nothing confirmed there.
What about Vučić's claim of foreign backing?
He alleged "European countries and the American deep state" supported the students. The BBC calls that unfounded, and he named no one.
Le Pouls
- Crowds poured into the streets of Belgrade, Novi Sad and Niš on election night, and the pro-Vučić tent camp at Pioneers Park was torn down by hand.
- A canopy collapse that killed 16 people in Novi Sad became the spark that turned weekly student protests into the largest anti-government rally in Serbia's history.
- With no formal leaders, the students built plenums, trained poll observers and fielded candidates for all 250 seats, with at least 135 now believed to have won.
- The 11-point programme demands police purges, media freedom and an end to party loyalists running public enterprises, while Vučić alleges foreign backing and predicts the students will fall.
- The elected MPs now face the pressure of keeping promises they never personally sought power to deliver, and every vote in the new parliament will be watched.
On the night the votes were counted, Serbians gathered in the squares of Belgrade, Novi Sad and Niš to watch a fourteen-year political order give way. The story began more quietly in November 2024, when a concrete canopy outside the Novi Sad train station fell and killed sixteen people, and many came to read the disaster as the visible face of a corruption that had grown too comfortable. From that grief a leaderless student movement grew into a national demand for accountability, and it has now carried its moral energy into parliament through candidates who are not students themselves. What comes next is less a victory than a test: whether the people chosen to speak for the movement can turn a public mood into the slow work of institutions.
On the night the votes were counted, crowds filled the town centres of Belgrade, Novi Sad and Niš and gathered outside the Student List headquarters. Their declaration was brief: "Serbia is free." Aleksandar Vučić, who had dominated Serbian politics for fourteen years, watched his Serbian Progressive Party fail in an election that many came to see as a referendum on the country's future. The most striking image came in central Belgrade, where Ćaciland, a pro-government tent camp set up eighteen months earlier outside parliament, was pulled apart by hand while people chanted that Vučić was leaving.
The movement had begun with loss. On 1 November 2024 a concrete canopy outside the Novi Sad train station collapsed and killed sixteen people. Many Serbians saw in the wreckage a picture of corruption, and critics linked the flawed renovation to a president who had closely tied himself to the project. What started as weekly student protests spread through campuses and city streets, drawing in farmers, actors and judges. By January 2025 the prime minister had resigned, and in March Belgrade saw the largest anti-government demonstration in the country's history. Without formal leaders, the students organised through assemblies called plenums, and when snap elections were called, they were ready, having trained people to guard fairness at the polls.
Vučić's tone shifted as the movement grew. He first called the protesters well-intentioned, then accused them of trying to bring down Serbia, and even as he conceded defeat he claimed, without evidence, that they were backed by foreign powers. The students never stood for office themselves. Their list fielded candidates for all 250 seats, led by Ilija Srdanović, a Novi Sad cardiologist and professor, and at least 135 of its names are thought to have won. They include former basketball star Dejan Bodiroga, actor Tihomir Stanić and former central bank governor Dejan Šoškić, whose name has been floated for prime minister.
The real work now falls to these new MPs. The movement's eleven-point programme asks for a police unit to pursue corruption, a purge of interior ministry officials who mistreated protesters or have ties to organised crime, a public broadcaster freed from political control, and an end to party loyalists being placed at the head of state enterprises. The SNS denies corruption and denies seeking to influence the media. The students, who hold no seats, say the citizens they chose now carry the street struggle into the institutions, and the next months will show whether those promises can be kept.
On the night the votes were counted, crowds filled the town centres of Belgrade, Novi Sad and Niš, and gathered outside Student List headquarters. The students posted a short declaration on social media: "Serbia is free." Aleksandar Vučić, who had dominated Serbian politics for 14 years, had seen his Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) fail in an election that came to be treated as a referendum on the country's future.
The most telling image came in central Belgrade. Ćaciland, a pro-Vučić tent camp set up 18 months earlier at Pioneers Park in front of parliament, came down. Metal fences were pulled apart as people shouted "Vučić is leaving."
The movement began with a death toll. On 1 November 2024, a concrete canopy collapsed outside the train station in Novi Sad, Serbia's second-largest city, and killed 16 people. Many Serbians saw the disaster as a symbol of corruption. Critics tied the station's fatally flawed renovation to a president who had closely linked himself to the project. Helena Ivanov of the Henry Jackson Society said the collapse "served as the last straw." She described it as an emotional spark that set off a national campaign of marches and events, reaching people in a way no opposition party had managed.
What began as weekly student protests demanding justice, on campuses and in city streets, spread well beyond universities. Farmers, actors and judges joined, often through local initiatives. By January 2025 the prime minister had resigned, in the words used at the time, to defuse tensions. In March 2025 Belgrade saw the largest anti-government protest in Serbia's history. With no formal leaders, the students organised through assemblies known as plenums. When Vučić called snap elections last month, Ivanov said, they were ready, having turned emotional momentum into an organisation and trained people to protect fairness at polling stations. Gordana Delić of the German Marshall Fund of the US, who called the vote in effect a referendum, summed up its message as the rule of law, not rule by the law.
Vučić's tone toward the protesters shifted. At first he called them well-intentioned. Before the vote he accused them of trying to bring down Serbia. Even as he conceded on Sunday night, he alleged, without evidence, that they were backed by unnamed "European countries and the American deep state." He told supporters the students had destroyed two years of life in Serbia and would be defeated "faster than they think."
The students themselves did not stand. The list, called Student List-Students Win, fielded candidates for all 250 parliamentary seats, but none was a student. It was a calculated choice, since voters were unlikely to back candidates with little life experience. The lead candidate was Ilija Srdanović, a cardiologist and professor in Novi Sad, who joined last week's march towards Belgrade and told the BBC that "the energy is unstoppable." He is not widely seen as a likely prime minister.
At least 135 people on the list are thought to have won seats. They include former basketball star Dejan Bodiroga, actor Tihomir Stanić, opera singer Nikola Mikić, former National Bank of Serbia governor Dejan Šoškić, and many professors. Šoškić's name has been mentioned for the top post. He has spoken about economic reforms and has been widely criticised in pro-government media.
The movement's 11-point programme now falls to these MPs. It includes a police unit to arrest those responsible for corruption, and a purge of interior ministry officials who broke rules on handling protesters or who have links to organised crime. It also calls for reform of the media landscape, freeing the public broadcaster from political control, and an end to installing party loyalists at the head of public enterprises. Vučić and the SNS deny corruption and deny seeking to influence the media.
Because the students made the promises, they will face pressure to see them kept, even though they hold no seats. They say the citizens they chose have been entrusted with carrying part of the street struggle of the past year into the institutions. What to watch next is whether those MPs deliver on corruption, police and media reform, and how Vučić's claims of foreign backing shape the next phase.
Citations marquantes
When the canopy collapsed that served as the last straw.— Helena Ivanov, Henry Jackson Society
The energy is unstoppable.— Ilija Srdanović, Student List lead candidate