House votes third time to end Iran war as $38bn cost sparks debate

The Pentagon's first review noted a Minab school strike on the war's first day killed 156 people including 120 children.
Rebuilding would take five years, even with accelerated production
The Congressional Budget Office assessed the depletion of U.S. missile stockpiles after the Iran conflict.
Mark

Why does the House keep voting on this if they know the president will veto it?

Mimi

It's partly about creating a record—showing voters that they tried. But it's also about the timing. With midterms 50 days away, the war and inflation are hurting Republicans. This vote lets them say they took a stand.

Luke

But the Senate already showed what happens when they actually pass one. They reversed course the next day after Trump called them in. So these House votes are theater.

Mark

What's the real damage here—the $38 billion itself, or something else?

Mimi

Both. The money is real, but the deeper problem is the missile stockpiles. The CBO says rebuilding them takes five years minimum. If China moves on Taiwan tomorrow, the U.S. doesn't have the interceptors it needs.

Luke

Though we should note: the Pentagon says they have "far more munitions than anyone in the world." That's Trump's position. The CBO disagrees, but it's not like there's perfect clarity on the actual numbers.

Mark

And the inflation piece—that's affecting regular people's wallets right now?

Mimi

Yes. The CBO estimates the war has added half a percentage point to inflation through early 2027. That's not huge in isolation, but it's real money for families already struggling.

Luke

The tricky part is isolating what's from the war versus what's from other factors. The CBO is making an estimate based on oil disruptions through the Strait of Hormuz. That's reasonable, but it's still an estimate.

Mark

What about that school strike on day one—156 people, 120 children?

Mimi

The Pentagon's inspector general report just came out, but it doesn't address that strike. Critics say the Pentagon buried an internal investigation that would show negligence in how they built their targeting data.

Luke

That's an accusation, not a confirmed fact. We know the strike happened and the death toll. We don't know what the internal investigation found because it hasn't been released.

  • A CBO report dropped like a stone into still water: $38 billion spent, $3 billion more each month, and missile stockpiles so depleted that rebuilding them would take five years even under accelerated production.
  • The House passed its war powers resolution 220-204, but the vote carries the weight of protest rather than power — Trump has promised a veto, and the Senate reversed a prior resolution overnight after a closed-door dressing-down from the president himself.
  • The Pentagon's inspector general quietly confirmed $22.3 billion in munitions spending alone, while a separate internal investigation into a school strike that killed 156 people — 120 of them children — remains suppressed and unaddressed.
  • Oil disruptions through the Strait of Hormuz pushed Brent crude from $64 to $103 a barrel at its peak, and the CBO projects war-driven inflation running 0.5 points higher than expected into early 2027.
  • With fewer than 50 days until midterm elections, this vote is almost certainly the last congressional action on Iran before voters render their own judgment — and the war's costs, human and economic, are expected to land hardest on Republicans.

For the third time in a single year, the House of Representatives has voted to end the war in Iran — a war that, by the Congressional Budget Office's own accounting, has consumed at least $38 billion, depleted the nation's missile defenses for half a decade, and sent inflation rippling through the broader economy. The vote, 220 to 204, arrived hours after the CBO's report made the true scale of the conflict impossible to ignore, yet the resolution faces the same fate as its predecessors: a Senate unlikely to hold firm and a president certain to veto. What the House has offered is less a mechanism for ending the war than a mirror held up to its cost — a democratic gesture in a constitutional framework that has, once again, proven unequal to the moment.

On a Tuesday evening in mid-September, the House of Representatives voted for the third time this year to end the war in Iran. The timing was pointed: just hours earlier, the Congressional Budget Office had released a report documenting what the conflict had truly cost. At least $38 billion spent. Monthly expenditures climbing by $3 billion. And the nation's stockpile of defensive missiles — Patriots, Thaad systems, naval interceptors — so thoroughly drawn down that restoring it would take five years at minimum, even with production pushed to its limits.

The vote followed a now-familiar script. Democrats, joined by a small number of Republicans, called for an end to the fighting. Republican Brian Mast of Florida, chairing the House foreign affairs committee, argued that Iran remained a genuine threat and challenged his colleagues to name which military assets they would pull from the region. The resolution passed 220-204, but its path forward was already closed. Trump had signaled a veto. The Senate had learned its lesson in July, when senators reversed a war powers resolution the day after approving it, following a closed-door lunch in which the president made his displeasure unmistakably clear.

The CBO's report laid out a conflict that had grown far beyond its original scope. Iranian strikes had damaged or destroyed hundreds of structures at U.S. bases across eight countries. The interceptor stockpiles now critically low were precisely those that would be needed in any future confrontation with China over Taiwan — where incoming missile volumes would far exceed anything the Iran campaign had demanded. The CBO called the shortfall 'especially problematic' in that context.

A day before the CBO report, the Pentagon's inspector general released its first formal review of the war, placing munitions spending alone at $22.3 billion through June and total spending at $33.4 billion. The review acknowledged strategic inventory shortfalls and industrial bottlenecks in resupply. It did not address the internal investigation into the Minab school strike on the war's opening day, which killed 156 people including 120 children — an inquiry critics say has been deliberately buried.

Beyond the battlefield, the war had reshaped the economy. Brent crude surged from $64 a barrel before the conflict to $103 at its peak. The CBO projected war-driven inflation running 0.5 percentage points above prior forecasts into early 2027, with interest rates already elevated as a consequence. The White House's $87.6 billion supplemental funding request included $12.1 billion in classified programs the CBO could not examine — a secret component larger than in any previous war supplemental.

With fewer than 50 days until midterm elections, this vote was almost certainly the last congressional action on Iran before voters went to the polls. The House had spoken. The Senate would not follow. The president would veto. And at $3 billion a month, the war would continue.

The House of Representatives voted for the third time this year to end the war in Iran, passing a war powers resolution 220-204 on a Tuesday evening in mid-September. The timing was deliberate: the vote came just hours after the Congressional Budget Office released a report documenting the true scale of what the conflict had cost the nation. The numbers were stark. The war had consumed at least $38 billion. The monthly burn rate was climbing by $3 billion. And the nation's stockpile of defensive missiles—Patriot interceptors, Thaad systems, navy air-defense rounds—had been so thoroughly depleted that rebuilding it would take a minimum of five years, even if production was accelerated.

The vote itself followed a familiar pattern. Democrats, joined by a handful of Republicans, called for an end to the fighting. Republican Brian Mast of Florida, who chairs the House foreign affairs committee, countered that Iran remained a genuine threat and questioned which military resources his colleagues would be willing to remove from the region. The resolution, like the two before it in June and July, would almost certainly never reach the president's desk. Trump had made clear he would veto any such measure. The Senate had learned this lesson the hard way in July, when after approving a war powers resolution on its tenth attempt, Republican senators reversed course the very next day following a closed-door lunch with Trump where he berated them over their disloyalty.

The constitutional question underlying the votes was genuine but increasingly abstract. Congress held the power to declare war; the president, as commander in chief, could authorize military actions for a limited time. The War Powers Act, born from the Vietnam era, had tried to formalize this tension by requiring congressional approval for sustained military operations beyond 60 or 90 days. But the mechanism had proven toothless when a president refused to acknowledge its constraints. The House votes were a form of protest, a way for lawmakers to register opposition before heading home to campaign. With fewer than 50 days until the midterm elections, the war and the cost-of-living crisis were expected to damage Republicans at the ballot box. This vote would likely be the last one on Iran before voters went to the polls.

The CBO report that prompted the vote painted a picture of a conflict that had metastasized far beyond its initial scope. Iranian strikes had damaged or destroyed hundreds of buildings and structures at U.S. bases scattered across eight countries: Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Oman, and Jordan. The cost of defending against Iranian ballistic missiles and drones had been extraordinary. The interceptor stockpiles that would be needed in any future conflict with China over Taiwan—where the sheer volume of incoming missiles would dwarf anything the Iran campaign had required—were now critically low. The CBO warned that shortages would be "especially problematic" in such a scenario, given China's expanding arsenal of ballistic and cruise missiles.

The Pentagon's own inspector general had released its first formal review of the war a day before the CBO report. It put munitions spending alone at $22.3 billion through the end of June, with total spending at $33.4 billion. The review noted that the fighting had "resulted in strategic inventory shortfalls and revealed industrial base bottlenecks for munitions resupply." It did not, however, address the Pentagon's internal investigation into the Minab school strike on the war's opening day, which had killed 156 people, including 120 children. Critics had long accused the Pentagon of suppressing the results of that investigation, fearing they would expose negligence in how targeting data had been compiled for the initial strikes.

Beyond the direct military costs, the war had rippled through the broader economy. Disruptions to oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz had driven up energy prices. Brent crude had jumped from $64 a barrel before the fighting began to $103 at its peak. The CBO calculated that this war-driven inflation would run 0.5 percentage points higher than previously expected by early 2027, with short-term interest rates already about 0.2 points higher than they would otherwise have been. In June, the White House had requested $87.6 billion in supplemental funding, with $67.1 billion earmarked for the Pentagon. Once the CBO stripped out spending it judged unrelated to combat operations—cybersecurity, drone programs, classified initiatives—roughly $42.3 billion of the Pentagon's request appeared tied to the Iran conflict, about 10 percent above the CBO's own estimate. The request included $12.1 billion for classified programs the CBO could not examine, a far larger secret component than in previous war supplementals.

What the CBO could not estimate, it acknowledged, was the cost of repairing the bomb-damaged bases or any future diplomatic and foreign aid expenses tied to the war. Those bills would come later, and they would be substantial. For now, the House had voted. The Senate would not follow. The president would veto if it reached his desk. And the war would continue, month after month, at a cost of $3 billion that the nation would keep paying.

Remember when Donald Trump said that this war would last just a few weeks? It's time for Congress to actually ask tough questions, as the constitution directs us to do, rather than be subservient to another warmongering administration.
— Democrat Seth Moulton, before the vote
The U.S. had far more munitions than anyone in the world and far more than we need.
— Donald Trump, responding to reports of depleted stockpiles
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei The Guardian ↗
Kontakt FAQ