New sedatives at hospital discharge tied to falls, readmissions in older adults

Older adults discharged with new sedative prescriptions experienced increased falls, hospitalizations, and deaths within 30 days, with significant impact on patients and families despite modest population-level risk percentages.
A small percentage increase translates into thousands of preventable falls
The researchers explain why modest statistical risks become major public health problems when applied across millions of older adults.

A hospital discharge is meant to mark the beginning of healing, yet new research from Mount Sinai and the University of Toronto reveals that for many older adults, the prescriptions handed over at that threshold may quietly undo what the hospital worked to repair. Across nearly two million patient records spanning two decades, scientists found that older adults sent home with new sedative prescriptions faced meaningfully higher risks of falls, emergency visits, readmissions, and death within thirty days. The finding asks a quiet but urgent question of modern medicine: in the rush to discharge, are we handing vulnerability back to the vulnerable?

  • One in eight older adults discharged from hospital left with a new sedative prescription — and a third of them had never taken one before, making the risk entirely novel to their bodies.
  • Within thirty days, those patients faced a 20% higher chance of a fall serious enough to require medical care, alongside elevated rates of emergency visits, rehospitalization, and death.
  • Clinical guidelines have long warned against sedatives in aging populations, yet the practice persists, shaped by the pressures of fast-moving discharge processes and incomplete follow-up.
  • Researchers are calling on clinicians to pause before that final prescription is written — to ask whether the medication is truly necessary, and if so, to schedule reassessment within one to two weeks.
  • The numbers may read as modest percentages, but multiplied across millions of annual discharges, they represent thousands of preventable tragedies landing on patients and families without warning.

A hospital discharge is supposed to signal the start of recovery — the return to familiar rooms and routines. But research from Mount Sinai Hospital and the University of Toronto suggests that for many older adults, the medications they carry home may be quietly working against them.

Analyzing discharge records for more than 1.86 million adults aged 66 and older between 2003 and 2023, researchers found that those sent home with new sedative prescriptions — particularly benzodiazepines or antipsychotics — faced a 20 percent higher risk of falls requiring medical attention within thirty days. They were also more likely to return to the emergency department, be readmitted, or die within that first month home.

The scale is striking. Roughly 246,000 of those discharged patients filled a sedative prescription within a week of leaving — and one-third had no prior experience with such medications at all. These were not continuations of existing treatment; they were new introductions at a moment of particular physical vulnerability.

Led by Dr. Lisa Burry, the research team acknowledges that percentage increases may appear modest in aggregate, but the human arithmetic is sobering: small risks multiplied across millions of discharges each year yield thousands of preventable falls, hospitalizations, and deaths.

The authors are not calling for an outright ban on discharge sedatives, but for deliberation. Clinicians should weigh whether a new sedative is truly necessary before a patient leaves, and if prescribed, ensure a follow-up appointment within one to two weeks. Community supports — fall prevention programs, medication reviews, mobility assessments — could provide an additional safety net.

The study arrives as hospital systems face mounting pressure to move patients through quickly, leaving little room for the careful reflection that discharge prescribing demands. Its message is plain: the last prescription written before a patient walks out the door deserves the same considered judgment as any other clinical decision.

A hospital discharge is supposed to be a milestone—the moment when recovery begins in earnest, at home, surrounded by familiar things. But new research suggests that for many older adults, the medications they leave the hospital with may be setting them up for a dangerous month ahead.

Scientists at Mount Sinai Hospital and the University of Toronto analyzed discharge records for more than 1.86 million adults age 66 and older, tracking what happened in the 30 days after they went home. The data came from hospital admissions between April 2003 and August 2023, giving researchers a sweeping view of prescribing patterns across two decades. What they found was sobering: older adults sent home with a new prescription for a sedative—particularly benzodiazepines or antipsychotics—faced a 20 percent higher risk of falls serious enough to require medical attention. They were also more likely to end up back in the emergency department, readmitted to the hospital, or dead within that first month.

The scale of the problem is substantial. Among the 1.86 million discharged patients, roughly 13 percent—about 246,440 people—filled at least one sedative prescription within a week of leaving the hospital. More striking still: one-third of those patients had never taken a sedative in the six months before their hospitalization. These were new medications, prescribed at the moment of discharge, to people who had no prior experience with them.

Clinical guidelines have long cautioned against sedatives and antipsychotics in older adults, citing the risk of falls, confusion, and other serious side effects. Yet the practice persists. The researchers, led by Dr. Lisa Burry, note that while the percentage increase in adverse events may seem modest when viewed across an entire population, the human toll is anything but modest. When you multiply a small percentage increase by millions of hospital discharges each year, you get thousands of preventable falls, readmissions, and deaths. For the patients and families involved, the impact is not statistical—it is immediate and devastating.

The authors stop short of saying these medications should never be prescribed at discharge. Instead, they call for deliberation. Before a patient leaves the hospital, clinicians should ask whether a new sedative is truly necessary, or whether it can be avoided, reduced, or replaced with something safer. If the medication is essential, the patient should have a medical appointment scheduled for one to two weeks later to reassess whether it is still needed. Community-based support—fall prevention programs, mobility assessments, regular medication reviews—could help catch problems early.

The research lands at a moment when hospital systems are under pressure to move patients through quickly, and when prescribing at discharge is often done in haste, without the kind of follow-up that might catch problems. The message from this study is clear: that final prescription handed over at checkout deserves the same careful thought as any other clinical decision. For older adults, it may be the difference between going home to recover and going home to fall.

Although the overall absolute magnitude of the risk was modest from a population perspective, the effects on patients and their families are clinically and socially important.
— Dr. Lisa Burry and co-authors, published in Canadian Medical Association Journal
Clinicians must consider whether new sedative prescriptions are essential or can be deprescribed or de-escalated before or shortly after hospital discharge.
— Study authors' conclusion
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Inventor

Why does discharge seem to be the moment when these medications get prescribed? Wouldn't doctors be more cautious at that point?

Model

You'd think so. But discharge is chaotic—there's paperwork, the patient is eager to leave, and the prescriber may not have full information about what the patient was taking before. It's easier to continue something started in the hospital than to stop it.

Inventor

So these aren't always new problems being treated. Sometimes it's just inertia.

Model

Exactly. A third of these patients had never taken a sedative before hospitalization. The hospital started them for a specific reason—maybe anxiety during acute illness, maybe to help them sleep—and then sent them home still taking it, without asking if they still needed it.

Inventor

And the falls—are those just a known side effect, or is there something specific about starting these drugs in older people?

Model

Both. Sedatives slow reaction time and affect balance. But older adults are especially vulnerable because their bodies process drugs differently, and they often have other conditions that make falls more dangerous. A fall that might be a bruise in a younger person can be a hip fracture and the beginning of serious decline.

Inventor

The study mentions follow-up appointments. How often does that actually happen?

Model

That's the gap. The research suggests it should happen one to two weeks after discharge, but many patients don't get that appointment scheduled. They're home, they feel okay, and by the time problems emerge, it's too late.

Inventor

What would change this?

Model

Hospitals would need to treat discharge prescribing as a deliberate clinical act, not a box to check. Ask: Is this medication still needed? Can it be stopped or reduced? If it stays, schedule the follow-up before the patient leaves. It's not complicated, but it requires intention.

Contact Us FAQ