For nearly seventy years, the shape of heavy atomic nuclei was considered settled science — a legacy of Nobel-winning work that drew the nucleus as a symmetric, rugby-ball form. Now, physicist Takaharu Otsuka and colleagues at RIKEN's Nishina Center have used the Fugaku supercomputer to demonstrate that virtually all such nuclei are actually almond-shaped, asymmetric, and capable of rotating on two axes rather than one. It is a rare moment in science when a foundational assumption dissolves — not through dramatic experiment, but through the patient persistence of a single skeptic and the compu
Heavy nuclei shaped like almonds, not rugby balls, physicists discover
The rugby ball was always an approximation.
Mark
Why did it take so long for someone to question Bohr's model? It seems like a straightforward thing to test.
Mimi
Because it worked well enough for most purposes, and because Bohr's name carried enormous weight. Once a Nobel laureate's framework becomes standard, it becomes invisible—just how things are done.
Mark
But Otsuka had doubts from the beginning. What kept him going when other physicists dismissed him?
Mimi
Intellectual stubbornness, partly. But also the feeling that something didn't add up logically. He couldn't articulate why a rugby ball shape was more natural than an almond shape, and that gap bothered him for decades.
Mark
The supercomputer was essential, then. He couldn't have done this with pencil and paper.
Mimi
Exactly. The calculations required to model triaxial deformations across heavy nuclei are too complex for hand calculation. Fugaku made it possible to show what theory had only suggested.
Mark
So now every nuclear physicist has to relearn their field.
Mimi
In a sense, yes. The shape of the nucleus affects rotation, affects how we search for new elements, affects the foundation of nuclear models. It's not a small correction.
Le Pouls
- A Nobel Prize-backed model of nuclear shape, unchallenged for nearly seventy years, has been overturned by a visiting scientist who spent decades doubting it in near-isolation.
- Otsuka's proposal that heavy nuclei are triaxial — almond-shaped, with an oval cross-section — was met with opposition at conferences and dismissed as a challenge to entrenched orthodoxy.
- Access to Fugaku, one of the world's most powerful supercomputers, gave the team the computational muscle to model heavy nuclei with a precision that earlier generations could not approach.
- The calculations revealed that virtually all heavily deformed nuclei are triaxial, not biaxial — meaning they can rotate around two axes, fundamentally altering how nuclear behavior must be modeled.
- The discovery now reshapes the search for superheavy elements, where accurate predictions of nuclear shape are essential to knowing where and how such exotic matter might exist.
For nearly seventy years, the shape of heavy atomic nuclei was considered settled science — a legacy of Nobel-winning work that drew the nucleus as a symmetric, rugby-ball form. Now, physicist Takaharu Otsuka and colleagues at RIKEN's Nishina Center have used the Fugaku supercomputer to demonstrate that virtually all such nuclei are actually almond-shaped, asymmetric, and capable of rotating on two axes rather than one. It is a rare moment in science when a foundational assumption dissolves — not through dramatic experiment, but through the patient persistence of a single skeptic and the computational power to finally prove him right. Nature, it seems, has always preferred the almond.
For nearly seventy years, the shape of heavy atomic nuclei was not really a question — it was an answer. Aage Bohr and Ben Mottelson established in the 1950s that such nuclei were elongated like rugby balls, symmetrical in cross-section, and the model was so well-regarded that Bohr shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physics for it. Textbooks drew them that way. Calculations proceeded from that premise.
Takaharu Otsuka, a visiting scientist at RIKEN's Nishina Center for Accelerator-Based Science, never fully accepted it. The doubt was quiet at first — a sense that the original reasoning was too simple, that there was no convincing general argument for why nuclei should deform so symmetrically. An almond, with its oval cross-section and lower symmetry, seemed to him more like what nature would actually choose. When he began voicing this at conferences, proposing that triaxial, almond-shaped deformations were common among heavy elements, the response was cold. The consensus was too entrenched to welcome the challenge.
Otsuka pressed on. His team gained access to Fugaku, one of the world's most powerful supercomputers, and used it to model heavy nuclei with unprecedented precision. The result was unambiguous: virtually all heavily deformed nuclei are triaxial — almond-shaped — not the biaxial rugby-ball forms that had defined the field for seven decades.
The consequences reach in several directions at once. Almond-shaped nuclei can rotate about two axes rather than one, which fundamentally changes how physicists must model nuclear rotation. The finding also bears directly on the search for superheavy elements — an active experimental frontier — where a correct understanding of nuclear shape is essential for predicting where such matter might exist. The rugby ball, it turns out, was always an approximation. Nature preferred something less tidy, and it took decades of quiet persistence to prove it.
For nearly seventy years, nuclear physicists operated from a single assumption about the shape of heavy atomic nuclei: they were elongated, like a rugby ball—symmetrical, predictable, round in cross-section. The model came from Aage Bohr and Ben Mottelson in the 1950s, work so foundational that Bohr shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physics for it. Textbooks drew them that way. Calculations proceeded from that premise. The consensus hardened into something close to fact.
But Takaharu Otsuka, a visiting scientist at RIKEN's Nishina Center for Accelerator-Based Science, never quite believed it. The doubt started small—a nagging sense that the original reasoning was too simple, that the mathematics lacked a convincing general argument for why nuclei should deform in such a symmetric way. Why, he wondered, would they adopt the shape of a rugby ball, round in cross-section, rather than something more asymmetrical? An almond, perhaps, with its oval cross-section and lower symmetry. That shape seemed more natural to him, more likely to be what nature actually chose.
For decades, Otsuka carried this skepticism quietly. Then he began to voice it at conferences, proposing that almond-shaped nuclei—what physicists call triaxial deformations—were actually common among heavy elements. The response was not welcoming. Other nuclear physicists met his ideas with skepticism and outright opposition. The consensus was too entrenched. The math from Bohr and Mottelson had held for so long that questioning it felt almost heretical.
Otsuka pressed on anyway. Working with colleagues, he undertook a theoretical study that would require computational power most researchers could only dream of. The team gained access to Fugaku, one of the world's most powerful supercomputers, and used it to model the behavior of heavy nuclei with unprecedented precision. What emerged from those calculations was striking: virtually all heavy ellipsoidally deformed nuclei, they found, actually possess triaxial shapes—almond-like, asymmetrical—rather than the biaxial rugby-ball forms that had dominated the field for seven decades.
The implications ripple outward in multiple directions. If nuclei are almond-shaped rather than rugby-ball-shaped, they can rotate about two axes instead of just one. This fundamentally changes how physicists must model nuclear rotation and behavior. The discovery also bears directly on the search for superheavy nuclei, elements heavier than any currently known, which represents an active frontier in experimental nuclear physics. A corrected understanding of nuclear shape becomes essential for predicting where and how such elements might exist.
Otsuka himself describes the moment with measured language: "This work represents a major shift in the fundamental description of nuclear structure that was entrenched for nearly 70 years." It is the kind of shift that happens rarely in physics—a wholesale revision of something so basic that it touches nearly every calculation that follows. The rugby ball, it turns out, was always an approximation. Nature preferred the almond.
Citations marquantes
When Aage Bohr's model was proposed, it produced some simple calculations, but they appeared overly simplistic to me. And there was no convincing general argument why the nucleus should be deformed in such a symmetric way.— Takaharu Otsuka
This work represents a major shift in the fundamental description of nuclear structure that was entrenched for nearly 70 years.— Takaharu Otsuka
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur Phys.org ↗
Science & Space