Hastie gave evidence under oath against Roberts-Smith in a defamation case, prompting One Nation to label him a traitor and target his Canning seat. One Nation won a nearby Western Australian byelection and has flagged a strong campaign against Hastie ahead of the 2028 federal election.
Hastie threatens One Nation with legal action over 'traitor' attacks
I gave evidence under oath, before God.
So Hastie testified against Roberts-Smith in a defamation case. Why did that make him such a target for One Nation?
Because One Nation and Gina Rinehart believe Roberts-Smith is being unfairly prosecuted over war crimes allegations. They see Hastie's testimony as a betrayal of a fellow veteran, especially one with a Victoria Cross.
But we should be clear: Hastie didn't volunteer. He was subpoenaed. He complied with a court order. That's not the same as choosing to go after Roberts-Smith.
Exactly. Hastie has been very explicit about that. He says he believed in the rule of law, so he testified under oath. One Nation is treating that as disloyalty.
And now One Nation is trying to unseat him in his own electorate?
They won a nearby byelection and have flagged a strong campaign in Canning for the 2028 federal election. It's a real political threat.
Though we should note: One Nation's ability to actually unseat him depends on a lot of variables. Winning Secret Harbour doesn't automatically translate to winning Canning.
What's Hastie's leverage here? Why threaten legal action now?
He's had enough. He's been called a traitor, his family has faced threats, and he's defending his military service. He's saying if they keep it up, he'll make it costly.
The legal threat is interesting because defamation cases are hard to win and expensive to pursue. Hastie may be signaling he's serious, but whether he actually files is another question.
Does this change his standing in the Liberal Party?
He's already seen as a potential alternative to Angus Taylor. This shows he's willing to fight, which some will see as strength.
Though it also shows he's under real pressure. A politician who feels secure doesn't usually send emails like this to supporters.
Der Puls
- Hastie testified under oath against Victoria Cross recipient Ben Roberts-Smith in a defamation case against Nine newspapers
- One Nation won a state byelection in Secret Harbour, which overlaps Hastie's federal electorate of Canning
- One Nation has flagged a strong campaign against Hastie ahead of the 2028 federal election
- Hastie deployed twice to Afghanistan as a captain in the SAS
Hastie gave evidence under oath against Roberts-Smith in a defamation case, prompting One Nation to label him a traitor and target his Canning seat. One Nation won a nearby Western Australian byelection and has flagged a strong campaign against Hastie ahead of the 2028 federal election.
Australian Liberal MP Andrew Hastie has threatened Pauline Hanson's One Nation with costly legal action over accusations he is a traitor, citing his testimony against Victoria Cross recipient Ben Roberts-Smith.
Andrew Hastie, a Liberal MP and former SAS captain, has drawn a line. In an email to supporters on Tuesday, he warned Pauline Hanson and One Nation strategist James Ashby that if they continue attacking him, he will pursue legal action—and make it expensive. The conflict centers on Hastie's decision to testify under oath against Victoria Cross recipient Ben Roberts-Smith in a defamation case brought against Nine newspapers. Roberts-Smith, now facing war crimes charges related to his service in Afghanistan, has the backing of One Nation and billionaire Gina Rinehart, who view his prosecution as unfair. Hastie's willingness to give evidence has made him a target.
The attacks have been personal and sustained. Hastie has been called a rat, a traitor, a dog, and worse. People he once trusted have distanced themselves from him. His family has faced threats serious enough that the federal government upgraded security around his home and office earlier this year. Yet Hastie has framed his decision to testify not as disloyalty but as a matter of principle—he believed in the rule of law, received a subpoena, and complied rather than risk contempt of court. "I gave evidence under oath, before God," he wrote.
What rankles Hastie most is the suggestion that his service record is in question. He deployed twice to Afghanistan as a captain in the SAS, leaving his wife knowing he might not return. He has defended his war service publicly and called out One Nation for failing to support efforts to hold Australian soldiers to high standards of battlefield conduct. In his email, he directly challenged Hanson and her party: "I'm calling time on cowards who have never served a day in the Australian Defence Force attacking my service record, my integrity, and my loyalty to Australia."
The political stakes are rising. One Nation won a state byelection this month in the Western Australian seat of Secret Harbour, which overlaps Hastie's federal electorate of Canning. The party has already signaled it will mount a strong campaign against him at the next federal election, scheduled for 2028. For Hastie, the threat is concrete: One Nation is trying to unseat him, and they are using his testimony as the weapon.
Hastie's position within the Liberal Party adds another layer. He is considered a leading alternative to opposition leader Angus Taylor and chose not to challenge Taylor in a leadership race earlier this year. A reshuffle of the opposition frontbench is looming, prompted by shadow home affairs minister Jonno Duniam's announcement that he will quit parliament within the next month or two. Hastie could benefit from that shift. Taylor, for his part, has told Liberal MPs that One Nation is "unfit to govern the country" and raised serious questions about the party's Victorian leader, Warren Pickering, after allegations emerged this week about Pickering's history of heavy drug use. Hanson has said Pickering denies the allegations and that she remains satisfied with him in the role.
Hastie's threat of legal action marks a significant escalation. He is not backing down, not apologizing for his testimony, and not accepting the framing that loyalty to a fellow veteran means silence about conduct. Instead, he is naming the cost One Nation will pay if they continue. Whether that cost materializes in court or remains a warning, the message is clear: the question of who gets to define loyalty in Australian politics, and at what price, is far from settled.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
I won't take any more slander from One Nation. I believe in the rule of law, so I complied with the subpoena rather than be found in contempt.— Andrew Hastie, in an email to supporters
If Pauline Hanson and James Ashby want to come after me, I will make it a very costly exercise in time, money, and political capital.— Andrew Hastie