Harry and Meghan's UK Security Under Review as Children Switch Schools

Children Archie (7) and Lilibet (5) were withdrawn from school due to security concerns about their daily commute.
The distance and traffic made it impossible to secure.
Why the Sussexes withdrew their children from school within days of enrollment.
Mark

So they're back in the UK now as permanent residents. What changes about their security situation compared to when they were just visiting?

Mimi

Everything, really. When you're a visitor, you're assessed one way. When you're living somewhere full-time, the risks and the routines are completely different. Ravec has to look at their daily patterns—where they go, how often, what threats might emerge from that regularity.

Luke

But we should be clear: no final decision has been made yet. The Risk Management Board is going to evaluate it, but we don't know what they'll conclude or what level of protection will actually be approved.

Mark

And the school situation—that happened very quickly. Days after the kids started?

Mimi

Yes. The private security team flagged that the original route was too difficult to secure. Too far, too much traffic, too many variables they couldn't control.

Luke

We don't know the specifics of what made it unsecurable, though. We know distance and traffic were factors, but the actual security assessment isn't public. We're working from what the couple's team has said.

Mark

Is this the first time Meghan's had a formal security review since they left?

Mimi

It is. She hasn't had one since 2020, when they stepped back from royal duties. Harry had one earlier this summer, but before they'd decided to move back permanently.

Luke

And it's worth noting that Harry's previous legal challenge over security—when he was in the US—didn't succeed. So this review process is the formal channel now.

Mark

What does the Uganda thing have to do with any of this?

Mimi

It shows the broader tension. The King's letter made clear they're not working royals anymore. Uganda almost pulled out of the Invictus Games because of that. But the King's office then reassured Uganda directly that their participation was fine.

Luke

So there's a contradiction being managed—they're non-working royals, but the King is still engaged in protecting Harry's interests where they matter to him. The security review happens in that same complicated space.

  • The Ravec committee has convened to determine what level of publicly-funded police protection is owed to Harry, Meghan, and their children now that the family is no longer passing through but putting down roots.
  • Within days of enrolling Archie and Lilibet in a new school, the Sussexes pulled both children out — their private security team had concluded the commute route was too long and too congested to be made safe.
  • A Risk Management Board will now evaluate specific threats against the family, marking the first formal security assessment of Meghan since she and Harry stepped away from royal duties in 2020.
  • Harry's previous legal battle to retain police protection while living abroad was unsuccessful, but permanent residency creates an entirely different framework — one the institutions must now navigate without precedent.
  • Amid the uncertainty, the family is quietly building a visible life: countryside outings shared on social media, and a diplomatic intervention by the King's private secretary that kept Uganda's participation in the Invictus Games intact.

When a family once defined by departure chooses to return, the institutions they left behind must reckon with them anew. Prince Harry and Meghan have resettled in the United Kingdom as permanent residents, prompting the formal body that oversees protection for royals and public figures to reassess what security the couple and their two young children now require. The shift from occasional visitor to full-time inhabitant is not merely administrative — it redraws the boundaries of obligation, risk, and belonging that have surrounded this family for years.

Prince Harry and Meghan have returned to the United Kingdom not as visitors but as permanent residents, and that distinction has set formal machinery in motion. The Ravec committee — the body responsible for overseeing protection of royals and other high-profile figures, drawing representatives from the Home Office, police forces, and the Royal Household — has begun reassessing what level of publicly-funded security the couple and their two children now require. No final determination has been made, but a Risk Management Board will evaluate the specific threats the family faces as they establish their new life.

The stakes of those security concerns became concrete almost immediately. Archie, seven, and Lilibet, five, began attending a new school earlier this month, but within days both children were withdrawn. The couple's private security team had concluded that the original school route — too long, too congested — could not be made adequately safe. Neither school has been named publicly, and a source close to the family was careful to note that the decision reflected no dissatisfaction with the institution or its staff.

This is not Harry's first confrontation with questions of protection. He previously pursued an unsuccessful legal challenge after his police cover was withdrawn when the family moved to the United States. But permanent residency changes the legal and practical landscape considerably. For Meghan, the coming review will be the first formal assessment of her security needs since the couple stepped back from royal duties in 2020.

Life in the UK is taking shape in other ways too. Meghan shared footage of a family countryside outing over the weekend, offering an early glimpse of their settled existence. And a diplomatic tension surrounding the Invictus Games — Uganda had seemed poised to withdraw after a letter reaffirming Harry and Meghan's non-working royal status — was quietly resolved when the King's private secretary spoke directly with Uganda's military leadership. Uganda has since confirmed it will participate. The security review continues as the family finds its footing.

Prince Harry and Meghan have returned to the United Kingdom as permanent residents, and that shift in status has triggered a formal reassessment of their police protection. The committee responsible for overseeing security for royals and other high-profile figures—known as Ravec, the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures—has begun the process of determining what level of publicly-funded protection the couple and their two children now require. The review marks a significant change from their previous arrangement, when they were treated as occasional visitors to the country rather than full-time inhabitants.

The security assessment will examine the specific risks the family faces in their new home and will take into account their daily movements and routines, including the routes they travel regularly and the logistics of getting their children to school. Ravec, which draws representatives from the Home Office, police forces, and the Royal Household, met last week to discuss the case. The committee has indicated it is prepared to evaluate potential threats, and a Risk Management Board will now consider what level of police protection is appropriate—though no final determination has yet been made.

The urgency of these security concerns became apparent almost immediately after the family's arrival. Their two children, Archie, who is seven, and Lilibet, who is five, began attending a new school earlier this month. Within days, however, the Sussexes withdrew both children from that school, citing security worries. The private security team working for the couple had determined that the original school route presented problems that could not be adequately managed—the distance involved and the volume of traffic on the commute made it difficult to establish secure transportation protocols. The names of either school have not been made public. In a statement, a source close to the couple emphasized that the decision to switch schools reflected no criticism of the original institution or the care the children had received there, and expressed gratitude to the staff.

This is not the first time Prince Harry has engaged in disputes over his security arrangements. He previously pursued a legal challenge against the decision to withdraw his police protection when he was living in the United States and visiting the UK. That case was unsuccessful. His circumstances have now changed fundamentally, however. The family's permanent relocation to Britain creates a different legal and practical framework for how their security is funded and managed.

For Meghan, this security review represents the first formal assessment of her protection needs since she and Prince Harry stepped back from royal duties in 2020 and moved to the United States. Prince Harry underwent a risk assessment earlier in the summer, though that review took place before it became clear that the family would be returning to live in the UK full-time. The new review will be the first to evaluate threats against both of them as permanent residents.

The family has begun to establish a visible presence in their new home. Over the weekend, Meghan posted video footage on social media showing the family on an outing in the countryside, offering a glimpse of their life in the UK. Separately, developments in Prince Harry's other major commitment—the Invictus Games, the international sporting competition for injured servicemen and women—have also shifted. Uganda had appeared likely to withdraw from next year's games following a letter sent on behalf of King Charles that reiterated the couple's status as non-working royals. However, the King's private secretary spoke directly with Uganda's military leadership to reassure them of the King's support for their participation, and Uganda has now confirmed it will take part. The security review will continue in the coming weeks as the family settles into their new circumstances.

The parents remain extremely grateful to all the teachers and staff for the love, care and effort they have shown their family. This decision should in no way be interpreted as a reflection on the school or the exceptional care the children have received there.
— Source close to the couple
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei BBC News ↗
Kontakt FAQ