Hanson offers qualified apology for calling Indigenous Australians 'most primitive race'

Indigenous Australians described with dehumanizing language, causing documented harm and offense to First Nations communities and their representatives.
She did absolutely demonstrate wilful ignorance
Indigenous senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price rejected Hanson's framing of the remarks as a communication problem.
Mark

So what exactly did Hanson say, and when?

Mimi

In a podcast from September 2025, she called Indigenous Australians the "most primitive race on Earth" while complaining about children learning Aboriginal history. The comments only surfaced publicly this week.

Luke

That's important—there's a year-long gap between when she said it and when it became public. We don't know why it resurfaced now or who brought it forward.

Mark

And her apology—did she actually apologize?

Mimi

She offered a conditional one. "If I offended people by using that term, yes, I will apologise for that." She also said she didn't intend to hurt anyone.

Luke

That's a crucial distinction. An "if" apology is not an apology for what was said; it's an apology for how it was received. She's not saying the characterization was wrong, just that she regrets if people felt hurt.

Mark

Who pushed back against her?

Mimi

Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, an Indigenous senator from the NT who Hanson has previously supported, was direct. She said Hanson showed "wilful ignorance" and that the problem was Hanson's tone and inflection, not just word choice.

Luke

Price's response is notable because she's from the same conservative side of politics. This wasn't partisan pushback—it was substantive.

Mark

Is there any chance of real consequences?

Mimi

Crossbench senators discussed a censure motion. Hanson has already been censured twice this year—once for comments about Muslims, once for a burqa stunt.

Luke

But we don't know if a censure motion will actually be moved, or whether it would pass. The source says some senators questioned what it would achieve, which suggests uncertainty about whether it's worth the effort.

Mark

What's the broader picture here?

Mimi

Hanson has a pattern of making inflammatory statements, offering qualified apologies that reframe the problem as poor communication rather than substance, and moving on.

Luke

That's fair, but we should be careful not to assume intent. We know what she said and how people responded. We don't know whether she genuinely believes what she said or was being deliberately provocative.

  • Hanson's description of Indigenous Australians as the 'most primitive race on Earth,' made on a podcast and resurfaced publicly, ignited immediate and unusually unified condemnation from government ministers, crossbench senators, and former allies alike.
  • Her initial refusal to apologize, followed hours later by a carefully hedged 'sorry if I offended people,' struck many critics as compounding the original harm rather than addressing it.
  • Indigenous affairs minister Malarndirri McCarthy called the language dehumanizing and demanded a genuine apology, while crossbench senators began discussing a censure motion — what would be Hanson's third in recent months.
  • Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, a previous Hanson ally, rejected the framing outright, insisting the problem was not word choice but the deliberate 'tone and inflection' running through the remarks.
  • Hanson simultaneously walked back separate comments about the Prime Minister's mother, revealing a week of cascading controversies managed through the same pattern of qualified retreat.
  • The episode has landed not as a resolved controversy but as an open question about whether parliamentary censure can meaningfully address speech that its author frames as mere ineloquence.

In the long and unresolved reckoning between Australia's settler institutions and its First Nations peoples, One Nation leader Pauline Hanson added another chapter this week — describing Indigenous Australians as the 'most primitive race on Earth' before offering a conditional apology that many found as troubling as the original words. The episode, unfolding in Canberra in September 2026, revealed not merely a failure of language but a deeper contest over whether dehumanizing speech is a matter of poor phrasing or of something more fundamental. That voices from across the political spectrum — including those who have long stood beside Hanson — joined in condemnation suggests the remark struck a nerve that transcends ordinary partisan division.

Pauline Hanson, leader of the One Nation party, offered a conditional apology this week after a podcast interview resurfaced in which she described Indigenous Australians as the 'most primitive race on Earth' and objected to children learning Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander history. The remarks, first reported on Monday, drew swift condemnation from across the political spectrum — a rare moment of unity that Indigenous affairs minister Malarndirri McCarthy said underscored why a genuine apology mattered. McCarthy described the language as 'deeply hurtful' and said it 'dehumanises First Nations people in Australia.'

Hanson initially declined to apologize, then reversed course hours later, saying: 'If I offended people by using that term, yes, I will apologise for that.' She framed the original comment as unintentional, acknowledging she was 'not the most eloquent speaker' — positioning the controversy as a problem of delivery rather than of the ideas themselves. That framing drew its own criticism, with many observers noting the distinction between a genuine apology and one that places the burden of offense on those who were hurt.

Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, whom Hanson has previously championed, rejected the explanation directly. Price argued that the issue was not vocabulary but the 'tone and inflection throughout those remarks,' and that building a better Australia required working together rather than diminishing people on the basis of race.

Crossbench senators raised the possibility of a censure motion — which would be Hanson's third in recent months, following earlier censures over comments about Australian Muslims and a Senate burqa stunt. The week's controversies extended further: Hanson also walked back remarks about Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's mother and her years in public housing, offering a similarly qualified retreat. The accumulating pattern of inflammatory comment followed by conditional apology has become a familiar rhythm in Hanson's political career, and the breadth of this week's response suggested that many across the parliament now see it as something more than a recurring communication problem.

Pauline Hanson, leader of the One Nation party, offered a conditional apology on Tuesday for describing Indigenous Australians as the "most primitive race on Earth," a characterization she made during a podcast interview in September 2025 that resurfaced this week. When asked about the remarks, Hanson told News24 she regretted the language if it had caused offense, though she framed the comment as unintentional. "That's not my intentions," she said. "That wasn't my intentions, to hurt people."

The podcast comments, first reported by News24 on Monday, showed Hanson objecting to children learning about Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander history. Her words drew swift condemnation from across the political spectrum—a rare moment of unity that Indigenous affairs minister Malarndirri McCarthy said spoke volumes about why a genuine apology mattered. McCarthy told the ABC that Hanson's language was "deeply hurtful" and "completely wrong," and that the comments "dehumanise First Nations people in Australia."

Hanson's qualified apology—structured as "if I offended people by using that term, yes, I will apologise for that"—came only hours after she had initially refused to apologize. When pressed about what she would say to Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, the NT Liberal senator whom she has previously supported, Hanson deflected by saying she had "always put my foot in my mouth" and acknowledged she was "not the most eloquent speaker in how I deliver something."

Nampijinpa Price responded sharply, rejecting Hanson's framing. "She did absolutely demonstrate wilful ignorance because there's a hell of a lot more to Australia's first people than simply what her remarks suggest," Price said. She emphasized that the problem was not merely word choice but Hanson's "tone and inflection throughout those remarks." Price also stressed that building a better Australia required working together rather than tearing people down on the basis of race.

Crossbench senators discussed the possibility of moving a censure motion against Hanson over the Indigenous comments, though some questioned what such a motion would accomplish. This would mark the third censure motion against Hanson in recent months. She had already been censured earlier in the year for what the Senate deemed "inflammatory and divisive" comments about Australian Muslims, and again in late 2025 for a burqa stunt.

The timing of the apology came amid a broader week of controversy for Hanson. She had also drawn criticism for remarks about Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's mother, who lived in public housing for decades. During a brief press conference at Parliament House on Tuesday, Hanson walked back those comments as well, saying she had been referring to the housing commission system rather than making a personal attack. "If he's taken offence to it, well, I'm sorry for that," she said.

The pattern of qualified apologies and deflections—framing offensive language as a matter of poor communication rather than substance—has become familiar in Hanson's political career. Her acknowledgment that she is "not the most eloquent speaker" positioned the problem as one of delivery rather than the ideas themselves. Yet the breadth of the response, from government ministers to crossbench senators to Indigenous leaders, suggested that many saw the issue as something deeper than a slip of the tongue.

She did absolutely demonstrate wilful ignorance because there's a hell of a lot more to Australia's first people than simply what her remarks suggest.
— Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, NT Liberal senator
Those comments were completely baseless. They harm. They dehumanise First Nations people in Australia.
— Malarndirri McCarthy, Indigenous affairs minister
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei The Guardian ↗
Kontakt FAQ