Gut Bacteria Molecule N-MNA Rapidly Repairs Intestinal Damage in Mice, Flies and Human Cells

Mice with inflamed colons lost 20% body weight and died untreated, while N-MNA-treated mice lost 5% and recovered; patients with IBD were studied via stool samples.
A tiny difference allows the bacterial compound to be turned back into NAD
Xiaoyang Su explains why N-MNA works where its near-identical human counterpart does not.
Mark

Why does this molecule stand out from other NAD boosters?

Mimi

Because of a small chemical difference. Human cells make a near-identical molecule when they get rid of extra NAD building blocks, but it can't be turned back into NAD. The bacterial N-MNA can.

Mark

And what did it do in the experiments?

Mimi

In damaged mouse colons, untreated mice lost 20% of body weight and died; treated mice lost 5% and recovered. In flies, seven-day survival went from 43% to 78%.

Luke

Those are animal results. What do we actually know about people?

Mimi

Only a correlation. In stool from 54 IBD patients and 20 healthy volunteers, low N-MNA went with higher inflammation markers.

Luke

So it's not shown that low N-MNA causes inflammation, or that giving it helps patients.

Mimi

Right. They didn't treat any IBD patients with it.

Mark

What about yogurt or probiotic supplements that contain these bacteria?

Luke

Untested. The team didn't check whether those strains raise NAD in people, so that's an open question.

Mimi

Wong also said other, better compounds can't be ruled out.

Mark

What's coming next?

Mimi

A $3.6 million, five-year NIH grant to find the human enzymes that process N-MNA, plus work on brain cells and on the bacterial genes involved.

  • In inflamed mouse colons, one dose of N-MNA turned a likely death into a quick recovery, with the untreated animals losing a fifth of their body weight.
  • Researchers found that people with inflammatory bowel disease who had low levels of this molecule in their stool also showed markedly stronger gut inflammation.
  • The team is trying to pin down the unknown human enzymes that convert N-MNA into NAD, backed by a five-year, $3.6 million federal grant.
  • A provisional patent has been filed and a stool test or probiotic approach is imagined, but no patient trials have started, leaving the idea suspended between laboratory promise and clinical proof.

In a study from Rutgers, researchers found that a small molecule made by certain gut bacteria, N-MNA, can help heal a damaged intestinal lining with striking speed in mice, flies and human cells. Its significance lies in its link to NAD, a coenzyme that fades as living things age, and in a chemical twist that lets the bacterial version be rebuilt into NAD while the human version cannot. The promise is still a promise: the evidence comes from laboratory systems and stool samples, and no one has yet tested it as a treatment in people with inflammatory bowel disease.

In a set of mice with badly inflamed colons, the difference between life and death came down to a single injection. Untreated animals lost a fifth of their body weight and died. Those given a molecule called N-MNA lost only about five percent and recovered. The work, from Rutgers Health and published in Science Advances, centers on a compound that certain gut bacteria produce, and that appears to mend the intestinal lining quickly.

What makes the molecule important is what it becomes inside cells. It can be converted into NAD, a coenzyme whose levels decline as we age. Human cells make a near twin of N-MNA while disposing of excess building blocks, but that version is a dead end. The bacterial one can be turned back into NAD. Human colon cells drew on it to supply about a fifth of their NAD within a day, and neurons, liver and kidney cells did the same. In fruit flies with damaged guts, seven-day survival rose from 43 percent to 78 percent, as the molecule spurred stem cells to regenerate the lining.

The human clues are indirect. Stool samples from 54 people with inflammatory bowel disease and 20 healthy volunteers showed that those with low N-MNA had higher markers of gut inflammation. The researchers suggest a stool test might one day help identify who would benefit from probiotics, though that is likely years away.

The team is candid about the gaps. No one has tested N-MNA as a treatment in patients, nor whether probiotic strains that make it raise NAD in people. A five-year National Institutes of Health grant will now search for the human enzymes that process the molecule, while other labs test its effects on brain cell health and map the bacterial genes that produce it. The next chapter will be whether those enzymes are found and whether patients ever receive it.

In mice whose colons had been inflamed and damaged, the difference came down to one injection. Animals that went untreated lost 20% of their body weight and died. Animals given a molecule called N-MNA lost only 5% and recovered. That contrast sits at the center of a study from Rutgers Health, published in Science Advances, describing a compound made by some gut bacteria that appears to heal the intestinal lining quickly.

The molecule's full name is (amide-)N-methylnicotinamide. It matters because of what it becomes inside cells: NAD, a coenzyme whose decline is thought to be a major driver of aging. NAD cannot enter cells directly, so scientists have long looked for precursors that cells can take up and convert. Some gut bacteria, including one sold in dietary supplements, already make an NAD precursor, which has fueled a market for products meant to raise it.

N-MNA is an unusual case. It is a near twin of a molecule human cells produce when they dispose of excess NAD building blocks, but the human version is a dead end. The bacterial one can be converted back into NAD. As Xiaoyang Su, an associate professor of medicine at Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, put it, a tiny difference allows the bacterial compound to be turned back into NAD. Nan Gao, a professor of pharmacology, physiology and neuroscience at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School and a senior author, said humans do not appear to make this exact molecule, though some of the bacteria in our guts do.

First author Jiangmeng Han, a doctoral student in biological sciences at Rutgers University-Newark, followed the molecule into human colon cells, where it supplied about 22% of their NAD within 24 hours. It also became NAD in human neurons, liver cells and kidney cells, and in the bodies and heads of fruit flies that were given it. The tests showed that N-MNA sped repair of damaged guts by stimulating stem cell regeneration. In flies with damaged guts, seven-day survival rose from 43% to 78%.

The human evidence is indirect. The team analyzed stool samples from 54 patients with inflammatory bowel disease and 20 healthy volunteers. Patients with low N-MNA had significantly higher levels of gut inflammation markers. Gao said patients with low levels of this metabolite showed higher inflammatory activity. He added that a stool test might eventually help identify patients likely to benefit from probiotics, though he thinks that is probably some years away.

The limits are clear. The researchers did not test N-MNA as a treatment in IBD patients. Nor did they test whether eating probiotic strains that make it, including Lactobacilli in yogurt and oral supplements, raises NAD in people. Ching-On Wong, an assistant professor of biological sciences at Rutgers-Newark and a senior author, said the compound itself may be sufficient but that other, better compounds cannot be ruled out. Gao described the work as still focused on fundamentals, requiring a team of a biochemist, a geneticist and an intestinal biologist.

The next steps are funded. The team has a five-year, $3.6 million National Institutes of Health grant to identify the still-unknown human enzymes that process N-MNA. Wong's lab is testing whether the molecule supports brain cell health and longevity, while Gao's lab is mapping the bacterial genes that make it. Rutgers has filed a provisional patent application on uses of N-MNA, naming Han, Ferraris, Su and Gao as inventors. What to watch is whether the enzyme work and any first tests in patients follow.

This compound itself may be sufficient, but we cannot rule out the possibility that there are other, better compounds.
— Ching-On Wong, Rutgers-Newark
Patients with low levels of this metabolite showed a higher inflammatory activity.
— Nan Gao, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en News-Medical ↗
Contáctanos FAQ