For decades, a quarter of the world's traded oil has passed through a narrow strait hugging Iran's coastline — a geographic fact that was tolerable in peacetime but has become strategically untenable in war. Now, Gulf producers are committing billions to rewrite the map of energy transit, threading new pipelines across deserts and toward distant ports in a wager that infrastructure, however costly and incomplete, is safer than dependence. The effort is historic in scale, but the new corridors carry their own shadows: Houthi drones, canal constraints, and the long arc of regional instability th
Gulf oil producers rush to build pipelines bypassing Iran-controlled Strait of Hormuz
relying so heavily on a single transit point is no longer prudent
So we're talking about a fundamental shift in how Persian Gulf oil reaches the world. What's driving this right now?
The war in Iran has made it clear that controlling the Strait of Hormuz is a real lever of power. Before, 15 million barrels a day moved through there. Now producers are saying: we can't keep betting our entire export strategy on a waterway Iran can choke off whenever it wants.
But wait—how much of this is actually new? Saudi Arabia built that east-west pipeline back in the 1980s. Are we talking about genuinely novel infrastructure or just accelerating projects that were already on the drawing board?
Mostly acceleration. The UAE pipeline to Fujairah started before the war. But the war has made these projects politically urgent and financially justified in a way they weren't before. The timeline has compressed.
And these alternatives actually work? They can handle the volume?
Potentially, yes. Goldman Sachs says by 2028 these projects could move 7.3 million barrels a day around Hormuz. That's about 60 percent of prewar Gulf exports.
But there's a catch, right? Some of these routes send oil in the wrong direction for Asia, which was the whole point of Hormuz in the first place.
Exactly. Pipelines to the Mediterranean mean oil has to go around Africa. That's longer, more expensive, and it doesn't help Asian customers who were the main beneficiaries of Hormuz.
And the Red Sea alternative—that's not safe either?
The Houthis attacked Saudi tankers there this week. They've disrupted shipping before. In 2019 they hit the Saudi pipeline with a drone strike.
So we're trading one vulnerability for others. The question is whether the new vulnerabilities are more manageable than dependence on Iran.
How long until these pipelines are actually operational?
The UAE project could be done by mid-2027. Iraq's plans to Turkey and Syria will take much longer. We're talking years, not months.
And there's no guarantee they stay operational. Pipelines can be attacked. Ports can be disrupted. This isn't a solution to regional instability; it's a workaround.
El Pulso
- With Iran's war exposing the danger of routing 15 million barrels daily through a single hostile chokepoint, Gulf producers are treating Hormuz dependence as an existential vulnerability they can no longer afford.
- At least seven major pipeline projects are now underway or planned, with Saudi Arabia and the UAE leading a multi-billion-dollar scramble to redirect oil toward the Red Sea, Gulf of Oman, and Mediterranean — routes that were once backup options and are now running near full capacity.
- Iraq, which relies on oil for 90 percent of government revenue, is pursuing ambitious but distant pipeline corridors to Turkish and Syrian Mediterranean ports and to Jordan's Red Sea outlet, though these routes send oil in the wrong direction for Asia-bound customers.
- The Red Sea alternative is already under fire — Houthi rebels struck two Saudi tankers there this week, and a 2019 drone attack shut down Saudi Arabia's east-west pipeline entirely, proving that no corridor is beyond reach.
- By 2028, new capacity could bypass 7.3 million barrels per day — roughly 60 percent of prewar Hormuz export volume — but the race between infrastructure completion and regional instability remains dangerously unresolved.
For decades, a quarter of the world's traded oil has passed through a narrow strait hugging Iran's coastline — a geographic fact that was tolerable in peacetime but has become strategically untenable in war. Now, Gulf producers are committing billions to rewrite the map of energy transit, threading new pipelines across deserts and toward distant ports in a wager that infrastructure, however costly and incomplete, is safer than dependence. The effort is historic in scale, but the new corridors carry their own shadows: Houthi drones, canal constraints, and the long arc of regional instability that no pipeline can fully outrun.
Every day before the war, roughly 15 million barrels of Persian Gulf oil moved through the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway that funnels a quarter of the world's traded petroleum past Iran's coastline. That chokehold is now driving a historic reshuffling of energy infrastructure. Gulf producers, unnerved by Iran's grip on the strait and watching prices climb, are pouring billions into pipelines designed to route their oil to ports on the Red Sea, the Gulf of Oman, and the Mediterranean.
At least seven major pipeline projects are under construction or in planning. The war has functioned as a forcing event — proof that dependence on a single transit point controlled by a hostile power is no longer a sensible strategy. Saudi Arabia and the UAE are leading the effort, while Iraq, which relies on oil for roughly 90 percent of government revenue, is scrambling to develop alternatives. Goldman Sachs analysts estimate that by 2028, these projects could move 7.3 million barrels per day around Hormuz — enough to bypass the strait for about 60 percent of prewar export volume.
Saudi Arabia already has a head start with its east-west pipeline, built during the Iran-Iraq war, running to the Red Sea port of Yanbu. The UAE's existing routes to Fujairah are also running near full capacity, and a new $3 billion parallel pipeline is roughly halfway complete, expected to add over 1.2 million barrels daily by mid-2027. Iraq's plans are more ambitious but more distant, targeting corridors to Turkish and Syrian Mediterranean ports and a separate route to Jordan's Red Sea outlet — though these directions are poorly suited for Asian customers who once relied on Hormuz, forcing oil on a far longer voyage around Africa.
The alternative routes are not safe harbors. Houthi rebels struck two Saudi tankers in the Red Sea this week, and a 2019 drone attack shut down Saudi Arabia's east-west pipeline entirely. The Suez Canal cannot accommodate the industry's largest tankers, and none of these projects address disruptions to LNG shipments — about one-fifth of global LNG trade, much of it from Qatar, also transited Hormuz before the war.
Still, the momentum is unmistakable. Gulf producers have concluded that the old arrangement is no longer acceptable, and the new pipelines represent a collective wager that the cost and complexity of alternative infrastructure — even if slower, more expensive, and still vulnerable — is preferable to strategic dependence. By end of next year, new projects could add 3.8 million barrels of daily capacity. The question is whether the corridors will remain open long enough to deliver on that promise.
Every day before the war in Iran, roughly 15 million barrels of Persian Gulf oil moved through the Strait of Hormuz—a narrow waterway that hugs Iran's coast and funnels a quarter of the world's traded petroleum to global markets. That chokehold is now prompting a historic reshuffling of energy infrastructure. Gulf oil producers, spooked by Iran's control of the strait and watching prices climb, are pouring billions into pipelines designed to route their oil around the bottleneck entirely, sending it instead to ports on the Red Sea, the Gulf of Oman, and the Mediterranean.
At least seven major pipeline projects are now under construction, in planning stages, or being actively discussed among government officials, oil companies, and energy analysts. The war has functioned as a forcing event—a demonstration that relying so heavily on a single transit point controlled by a hostile power is, as one senior analyst put it, no longer a sensible long-term strategy. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are leading the charge, but Iraq, which depends on oil sales for roughly 90 percent of its government revenue, is also scrambling to develop alternatives. The scale is enormous. Goldman Sachs analysts estimate that by the end of 2028, these new projects could move 7.3 million barrels per day around Hormuz—enough to bypass the strait entirely for about 60 percent of the Persian Gulf's prewar export volume of 23 million barrels daily.
Saudi Arabia already has a head start. In the 1980s, during the Iran-Iraq war, the kingdom built an east-west pipeline carrying oil across its desert from a processing facility at Abqaiq to the Red Sea port of Yanbu. That pipeline, combined with the UAE's existing routes to the port of Fujairah on the Gulf of Oman, had spare capacity of between 3.5 and 5.5 million barrels per day before the current war began. Both are now running near full capacity. The UAE is accelerating construction of a new $3 billion, 300-kilometer pipeline to Fujairah that will run parallel to the existing one and add more than 1.2 million barrels daily to the port's throughput. The project, which started before the war, is roughly halfway complete and is expected to finish by mid-2027, though port expansion work may push that timeline further.
Iraq's plans are more ambitious but also more distant. The government is pursuing pipeline projects with U.S. companies to move oil from the Basra terminal—which exported more than 3 million barrels daily before the war—northward to the Turkish Mediterranean port of Ceyhan, with a branch extending to the Syrian port of Baniyas. The U.S. State Department has called Baniyas a critical energy corridor. Iraqi officials are also discussing a separate pipeline to the Jordanian port of Aqaba on the Red Sea, from which oil could be exported via the Suez Canal to Asia. These longer routes will add time and cost to oil shipments, and they point to a fundamental problem: pipelines carrying oil to the Mediterranean send it in the wrong direction for Asian customers who relied on Hormuz exports, forcing a much longer voyage around Africa's southern tip.
The alternative routes are not immune to disruption. The Red Sea has become a contested waterway. Yemen's Iran-backed Houthi rebels attacked two Saudi oil tankers there early this week, demonstrating that the new corridors carry their own vulnerabilities. The rebels have successfully disrupted shipping before at the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, which connects the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden. In May 2019, a Houthi drone strike shut down Saudi Arabia's east-west pipeline entirely. Oil sent through the Suez Canal to reach the Mediterranean faces a different constraint: the canal cannot accommodate the industry's largest tankers, which hold up to 2 million barrels per vessel and are often the most economical way to move oil over long distances. And the pipeline projects do nothing to address disruptions to liquefied natural gas shipments, which account for about one-fifth of global LNG trade and transited Hormuz before the war—much of it from Qatar bound for Asian customers.
Still, the momentum is unmistakable. Gulf producers have concluded that the old arrangement—funneling a quarter of the world's oil through a single strait controlled by a hostile power—is no longer acceptable. The new pipelines represent a bet that the cost and complexity of building alternative infrastructure, even if it is slower and more expensive and still vulnerable to attack, is preferable to the strategic risk of dependence. By the end of next year, these projects could add 3.8 million barrels of daily capacity. By 2028, that figure could reach 7.3 million. The question now is whether the new routes will remain open long enough to deliver on that promise.
Citas Notables
Relying so heavily on the Strait of Hormuz is no longer a prudent long-term strategy.— Victoria Grabenwöger, senior research analyst at Kpler
The ambitious timeline has only become feasible against the backdrop of the Strait of Hormuz blockade.— Victoria Grabenwöger, Kpler, on UAE pipeline acceleration