In the aftermath of a deeply contested Green Party motion defining Zionism as racism, the author of that motion — British-Palestinian artist and party member Lubna Speitan — has been named in court documents as a close friend of Minh Quang Pham, a man sentenced to 40 years in a US prison for supporting al-Qaeda and allegedly plotting to bomb Heathrow Airport. The revelation, arriving as the party already fractures over accusations of antisemitism and international diplomatic fallout, asks an older and harder question: how well do we know those we defend, and what does our defense of them say a
Green Party member behind Zionism motion linked to jailed al-Qaeda supporter
one of the kindest, most sincere people she had ever known
So Speitan wrote a motion about Zionism, it passed, and then we found out she'd been friends with someone convicted over al-Qaeda support. Is that the whole story?
That's the skeleton of it. But the timing is what makes it explosive. The motion passed Sunday, triggered international backlash by Monday, and by Tuesday the court documents connecting her to Pham surfaced.
What exactly did she do for Pham? Did she help him?
The documents say she offered to testify about his mental state as a defence witness. She wrote a letter to the judge saying he was one of the kindest people she knew. But there's no evidence she knew about his alleged activities.
She described him as someone the system had targeted. When asked if they were still in contact, she said yes.
Forty years is a long sentence. What was he actually convicted of?
He admitted to three counts related to supporting al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. Prosecutors said he'd been directed by Anwar al-Awlaki to plant explosives at Heathrow. He denied planning the actual attack, but he pleaded guilty to the support charges.
So Speitan's motion about Zionism—does it have anything to do with Pham?
Not directly. The motion calls for a single Palestinian state across historic Palestine. It's a political statement about Israeli policy. Pham's case is about alleged terrorism.
But they're now linked in the public mind because of who proposed the motion. That's the real damage—not that she knew someone, but that it happened to be someone convicted in connection with a Heathrow bomb plot, and the motion itself triggered accusations of antisemitism.
Did the Green Party know about this connection before the motion passed?
The documents don't say. The BBC asked Speitan for comment and got nothing. The party said she holds no official positions and they have processes to investigate.
What's clear is the party is fracturing. The deputy leader in Wales resigned. Other councillors have quit. The leader, who is Jewish, is trying to separate antisemitism from criticism of Israel, but the motion itself is being read as antisemitic by many.
What happens now?
That's genuinely unclear. The party has internal processes, but Speitan hasn't responded publicly. The motion is policy. The damage to the party's reputation is already done.
El Pulso
- A motion passed at the Green Party's conference — defining Zionism as ethnonationalism and calling for a single Palestinian state — has already cost the party diplomatically, with Israel banning leader Zack Polanski and Jewish organizations filing formal complaints with Britain's equality watchdog.
- Court documents from 2015 now reveal that the motion's author, Lubna Speitan, offered to serve as a character witness for a man convicted of al-Qaeda support and an alleged plot to detonate explosives in Heathrow's arrivals hall — describing him as one of the kindest people she had ever known.
- Speitan reportedly told the Telegraph she remains in contact with Pham and believes he was targeted by the system, a statement that has intensified scrutiny of her judgment at the worst possible moment for her party.
- The Green Party's response — noting Speitan holds no official role and that internal processes exist for members whose views conflict with party values — has done little to slow the resignations, including that of Welsh deputy leader Phil Davies, who called the motion the final nail in the coffin of his membership.
- Party leader Zack Polanski, himself Jewish, has attempted to hold a line between antisemitism and political criticism of Israel, but the dual controversies have left the Greens navigating a crisis that is simultaneously ideological, reputational, and deeply personal.
In the aftermath of a deeply contested Green Party motion defining Zionism as racism, the author of that motion — British-Palestinian artist and party member Lubna Speitan — has been named in court documents as a close friend of Minh Quang Pham, a man sentenced to 40 years in a US prison for supporting al-Qaeda and allegedly plotting to bomb Heathrow Airport. The revelation, arriving as the party already fractures over accusations of antisemitism and international diplomatic fallout, asks an older and harder question: how well do we know those we defend, and what does our defense of them say about us? For the Green Party, the convergence of these two stories has transformed an internal ideological dispute into something far more difficult to contain.
Lubna Speitan, a British-Palestinian artist and Green Party member, authored a motion that passed at the party's recent conference defining Zionism as an ideology supporting an ethnonationalist Jewish state and calling for a single democratic Palestinian state across all of historic Palestine — territory that includes modern-day Israel. The consequences were immediate: Israel banned Green Party leader Zack Polanski from entering the country, Jewish organizations condemned the motion as an attack on their community, and MPs from Labour and the Liberal Democrats filed complaints with Britain's equality watchdog.
Days later, a second revelation arrived. Court documents from 2015 showed that Speitan had offered to testify as a character witness for Minh Quang Pham, a Vietnamese-born British national convicted in the United States and sentenced to 40 years in prison for supporting al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. Prosecutors alleged that Pham had been directed by al-Qaeda leader Anwar al-Awlaki to bomb Heathrow's arrivals area following seven months of training in Yemen. Though a medical condition prevented Speitan from appearing in court, she submitted a letter to the presiding judge in 2016 describing Pham as one of the kindest, most honest, and most sincere people she had ever known — and suggesting that a fuller understanding of his character might have seen the case dismissed.
When contacted by the Telegraph, Speitan reportedly confirmed she remains in contact with Pham and believes he was targeted by the system. The BBC received no response to its request for comment. The Green Party stated that Speitan holds no official positions within the organization and that it has internal processes to address members whose expressed views conflict with party values — a response that did little to stem the fallout.
Resignations followed. Phil Davies, the Green deputy leader in Wales, left both his role and his party membership, describing the Zionism motion as the final nail in the coffin of his commitment to the Greens. Other councillors departed as well. Party leader Zack Polanski, who is Jewish, insisted that antisemitism and criticism of the Israeli state must remain entirely distinct categories, and that no one should be excluded from the party on the basis of religious or communal identity. But the dual controversies — one ideological, one deeply personal — have left the Green Party contending with questions about its values, its internal culture, and the judgment of those who shape its direction.
Lubna Speitan, a British-Palestinian artist and Green Party member, authored a motion that would become one of the most divisive proposals in the party's recent history. Passed on Sunday, the motion defined Zionism as an ideology supporting an ethnonationalist Jewish state and called for a single democratic Palestinian state across all of historic Palestine—a formulation that would include the territory of modern-day Israel. The motion triggered swift and severe consequences: Israel's government banned Green Party leader Zack Polanski from entering the country, Jewish organizations condemned it as an attack on their community, and lawmakers from Labour and the Liberal Democrats filed complaints with Britain's equality watchdog.
What emerged in the days following the vote, however, was a connection that complicated the narrative considerably. Court documents from 2015 revealed that Speitan had offered to testify as a defence witness for Minh Quang Pham, a Vietnamese-born British national who had been arrested at Heathrow Airport in 2011 and later extradited to the United States. Pham was convicted and sentenced to 40 years in prison after admitting to three counts related to his support for al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, an offshoot of the broader al-Qaeda network. According to US prosecutors, Pham had been directed by al-Qaeda leader Anwar al-Awlaki to detonate explosives in Heathrow's arrivals area after receiving training during a seven-month stay in Yemen.
In the court filings, Speitan was identified as a close friend of Pham's who could provide testimony about his mental state—evidence that prosecutors said would be crucial to establishing a mental health defense. A medical condition prevented her from testifying in person, but she submitted a letter to the US District Judge in 2016. In that letter, she described Pham as one of the kindest, most honest, and most sincere people she had ever known. She wrote that if the judge truly understood the Pham that she and others had come to respect, they might have had the case dismissed entirely. She acknowledged he may have developed behavioral issues but maintained her characterization of his fundamental character.
The existence of the letter, first reported by the Jewish Chronicle, raised immediate questions about Speitan's judgment and associations at a moment when the Green Party was already fracturing over her Zionism motion. When asked by the Telegraph whether she remained in contact with Pham, Speitan reportedly confirmed that she did, adding that she believed he had been targeted by the system. The BBC sought comment from Speitan but received no response. The Green Party stated that she held no official positions within the organization and that the party takes allegations of this nature seriously, noting it has internal processes to investigate members whose expressed views conflict with party values.
The timing of these revelations deepened the crisis within the Greens. Party leader Polanski, who is Jewish, released a statement asserting that antisemitism and criticism of the Israeli state must remain completely distinct categories, and that he would not accept anyone being excluded from the party based on their religious or communal identity. Yet the motion itself had already prompted resignations. Phil Davies, the Green deputy leader in Wales, resigned from both his position and his party membership on Tuesday, calling the motion the final nail in the coffin of his commitment to the organization. Other Green councillors followed suit.
The documents containing Speitan's name made no suggestion that she had known of Pham's criminal activities during the time they were acquainted. The nature and duration of their friendship remained unclear from the publicly available record. What was clear was that her association with a man convicted in connection with an alleged plot against a major British airport, combined with her authorship of a motion that had triggered accusations of antisemitism and international diplomatic consequences, had created a perfect storm of controversy for a party already struggling with internal cohesion. The Green Party now faced not only the substantive debate over its Zionism motion but also questions about the judgment and associations of one of its members at a moment when such scrutiny felt particularly acute.
Citas Notables
If the judge truly knew the Minh that and others grew to love and respect, they may have probably had the whole case dismissed.— Lubna Speitan, in a 2016 letter to a US District Judge regarding Minh Quang Pham
Antisemitism and criticism of the Israeli state are, and must always be, completely distinct.— Zack Polanski, Green Party leader