GP forced out after raising gender care concerns, tribunal hears; NHS admits some processes were mishandled

An NHS safety investigation found 78 children potentially harmed after being prescribed puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones without proper checks, and Redvers says she was left traumatised and off sick for months.
Concerns were raised appropriately and leaders knew about it
Redvers on reading the June report into 78 children potentially harmed at the WellBN practice.
Mark

Why does this case matter beyond one doctor's job?

Mimi

Because it asks what happens to someone whose role is to receive safety concerns. Redvers was the safeguarding GP, and her own grievance outcome warned that her treatment would discourage other staff from speaking up.

Luke

That warning is from the NHS's own grievance process, which is worth noting. The tribunal hasn't ruled yet, so the constructive dismissal claim is still just a claim.

Mark

And the 78 children?

Mimi

A June 2026 safety investigation found 78 children potentially harmed after prescriptions without proper checks at WellBN, some as young as 13.

Luke

But careful with the link. That report says it was prompted by a drug review in autumn 2024, not Redvers' concerns. The reporting doesn't establish that her complaints would have prevented the harm; that's her view and her supporters'.

Mark

What about the transphobia accusation?

Mimi

She rejects it and says her concerns were about assessment and evidence. The second investigation, though, found no cause for concern about Hall and called one colleague's interest disproportionate.

Luke

And Hall's side isn't in the story beyond his email to Doyle and his public views. He and WellBN were contacted for comment, so that gap is real.

Mark

What has the NHS conceded?

Mimi

NHS Surrey and Sussex says some employment processes should have been handled differently and has apologised. It hasn't commented on the substance pending the judgment.

  • A GP who was supposed to be the safety net for colleagues says she was bullied out of her job after warning about prescribing practices.
  • An NHS safety investigation found 78 children potentially harmed by puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones given without proper checks.
  • NHS Surrey and Sussex admits some employment processes should have been handled differently and has apologised.
  • The constructive dismissal claim against the NHS board and its former chief executive now waits on a tribunal judgment expected in several months.

Some stories arrive as a single headline and then reveal, over years, how many hands touched them. Dr Sarah Redvers, once the GP to whom colleagues brought their worries about patient safety, has told the BBC and an employment tribunal that she was pushed out of the NHS for raising concerns about gender care prescribing in Sussex. An independent safety review has since found that 78 children may have been harmed by treatments given without proper checks, and the NHS has conceded that its handling of her own employment should have gone differently. The tribunal's judgment, still months away, will show whether a system built to hear uncomfortable warnings can actually bear to listen to them.

In July 2020, a doctor in Sussex phoned a colleague with a worry about a young patient. The patient was 18 and distressed about her gender, and had been directed to an online clinic registered overseas that wanted the surgery to take over testosterone prescribing. The colleague was Dr Sarah Redvers, the named safeguarding GP for Sussex, the person others turned to when they feared a patient was not safe.

Redvers says her concern was that a Brighton GP, Dr Sam Hall, was recommending treatment for people he had never assessed, and that other doctors were uneasy about prescribing it. She raised it with NHS England as a whistleblower. The complaint was investigated and NHS England said it was satisfied with Hall's practice. Over the following months more GPs brought her worries about assessments, puberty blockers, hormones and the lack of specialist oversight at WellBN, the clinic where Hall worked. A second investigation followed, and Redvers says she was told there was a general fear that allegations of transphobia would be made. That inquiry found no cause for concern, and described one colleague's persistent interest as disproportionate. Redvers understood that to mean her.

In 2021, after a vulnerable 15-year-old's care was flagged, Redvers referred Hall to the General Medical Council. The GMC did not pursue it. The NHS instead opened an investigation into her. She describes a four-hour interview she found brutal and oppressive, after which she was off sick for months and treated for trauma. A grievance process later upheld most complaints made by colleagues about the process and recommended an apology to her, warning that her treatment would discourage staff from speaking up. In 2023 she felt she had no choice but to leave her safeguarding role.

In June 2026, a separate NHS safety investigation found that 78 children, some as young as 13, had potentially been harmed by treatments prescribed at WellBN without proper checks. NHS England called it totally unacceptable, and says its national directors acted once concerns reached them in 2023. NHS Surrey and Sussex accepts that some employment processes should have been handled differently. Redvers says it is painful to see a harm that might have been stopped, because she raised the concerns properly and leaders knew. Her claim now awaits a judgment that may take several months.

In July 2020, a doctor in Sussex rang a colleague with a worry about a patient. The patient was an 18-year-old woman, distressed about her gender, who had used an online clinic registered overseas. The clinic wanted the doctor's surgery to take over prescribing testosterone. The colleague she called was Dr Sarah Redvers, then a named safeguarding GP for Sussex, the person other doctors could turn to when they had safety concerns about patients.

The doctor had also been advised on such prescriptions by a Brighton GP, Dr Sam Hall. Redvers, speaking publicly for the first time, has told the BBC and an employment tribunal that her concern was that Hall was recommending treatment for patients he had not assessed or met, and that other GPs were uncomfortable prescribing it. She spoke to NHS England and was advised to raise the complaint as a whistleblower. It was investigated, and NHS England said it was satisfied with Hall's practice.

Over the following months, other GPs came to her with worries about the quality of assessments, the prescribing of puberty-blocking drugs and cross-sex hormones, and the lack of specialist supervision at WellBN, the clinic where Hall was based. A second NHS investigation followed. Redvers says the investigator told her there was a general worry that allegations of transphobia would be made. That investigation considered the full scope of Hall's work and found no cause for concern, adding that one colleague's persistent interest in the issue appeared disproportionate. Redvers took that to mean her.

Hall qualified as a GP in 2019, is a trans man, and is known in Brighton as a campaigner for transgender rights. He has said publicly that his own pain showed him the importance of affirmative care. He was also working with the local NHS on a Trans Health hub and with a Brighton charity, The Clare Project. Redvers says her concerns were about the quality of care and the medical evidence behind it, not anyone's views on gender. She calls any suggestion of transphobia appalling, and says it is dangerous that such claims obscured the medical and safeguarding questions.

In 2021, while the second investigation was pending, local mental health services raised a concern about the care of a vulnerable 15-year-old. Redvers referred Hall to the General Medical Council. Hall emailed Adam Doyle, then chief executive of NHS Sussex, writing that he was being victimised and needed protection from this individual and their repeated attempts to disrupt his career. Doyle initially told the tribunal he had not known Hall beforehand, but it emerged that he had held several mentoring meetings with him.

The GMC did not take the referral forward. The NHS, however, opened an investigation into Redvers, using an external investigator. She told the tribunal she was called to a four-hour interview she describes as brutal and oppressive, in which she had no real chance to explain what happened. She broke down at one point, was off sick for several months, and received treatment for trauma. Colleagues interviewed in the process also complained about it, and most of those complaints were upheld. The grievance outcome concluded that the chief executive and the trust should apologise to Redvers, and warned that her treatment would have a broader negative impact on staff willingness to raise concerns.

In 2023, a year after that outcome, a trans campaigner suggested at an NHS meeting that she was transphobic. Redvers told the tribunal the NHS did not do enough to support her, and she felt she had no choice but to leave her safeguarding role. Around then, parents, school governors and social workers began raising their own concerns about WellBN and Hall. Rachel Cashman, co-founder of the campaign group PSHE Brighton, called it a travesty that Redvers was punished for doing her job.

In June 2026, nearly six years after her first concerns, a separate NHS safety investigation found that 78 children, some as young as 13, had potentially been harmed after being prescribed puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones without proper checks at WellBN. The report said it responded to a drug review in autumn 2024, not to Redvers' earlier concerns. NHS England called it totally unacceptable that young people were put at risk because practitioners provided care they were not commissioned to deliver. Redvers said reading about a scandal that could have been stopped was upsetting, because concerns were raised appropriately and leaders knew.

NHS England says that when concerns about one GP's prescribing reached its national directors in 2023, they met an affected family and asked regional standards leads to investigate. Wider concerns emerged, WellBN was told to stop its specialised prescribing service, and an independent patient safety investigation began in 2025. NHS Surrey and Sussex says some employment processes should have been handled differently, and it has apologised. Hall and WellBN have been approached for comment; WellBN said in June that it recognised the seriousness of the matters and that its priority remained compassionate, safe and effective care.

Redvers' constructive dismissal claim, against NHS Sussex Integrated Care Board and Doyle, who left the chief executive post in 2025, now awaits judgment, which may take several months.

We recognise that some employment processes should have been handled differently.
— NHS Surrey and Sussex
It is a travesty that Sarah Redvers was punished for doing her job safeguarding.
— Rachel Cashman, co-founder, PSHE Brighton
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en BBC News ↗
Contáctanos FAQ