In the long and contested history of public health communication, the distance between private doubt and public assurance has always carried moral weight. Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin now claims that newly released text messages from Dr. Anthony Fauci's government phone reveal that weight was carried in secret — that concerns about mRNA vaccine risks during early pregnancy were expressed privately to colleagues in January 2021, even as the public was told the vaccines were safe. Whether this constitutes deception or the ordinary caution of scientists navigating uncertainty in real time, th
GOP Senator Claims Fauci Texts Show Private Vaccine Concerns vs. Public Messaging
Alleged impact on pregnant women who received vaccines based on public health guidance that may have differed from private concerns.
They knew it. They're just that devious to play with the statistics.
Mark
When Fauci wrote about cytokine storms potentially causing miscarriage, was he warning his colleagues to investigate further, or was he expressing settled concern?
Mimi
The text itself reads like a heads-up—he's flagging something he'd learned and wanted them to be aware of. But Johnson's argument is that if Fauci had real concern, it should have shaped what was said publicly.
Mark
And the math Johnson uses—the 82 percent figure—is that a fair way to read the published study?
Mimi
The study authors presented it differently. They looked at all 827 pregnancies and reported outcomes. Johnson is isolating a subset and recalculating. Both approaches are mathematically valid, but they tell different stories about risk.
Mark
Why would Fauci express private concern but not push back on public health guidance?
Mimi
That's the core question Johnson is raising. Either the concern wasn't serious enough to act on, or it was serious and deliberately downplayed. The texts alone don't answer that.
Mark
What does informed consent actually require in this context?
Mimi
Typically, it means pregnant women should have known about any genuine risks being discussed among experts. If officials privately worried but publicly reassured, that's a breach of the principle.
Mark
Is there evidence the vaccines actually caused the miscarriages Johnson is citing?
Mimi
The study tracked outcomes but didn't prove causation. Johnson is arguing the numbers suggest risk; the original researchers didn't draw that conclusion from the same data.
O Pulso
- Text messages from Fauci's government phone, released by Johnson's Senate subcommittee, show Fauci privately flagging a theoretical link between post-vaccine cytokine storms and first-trimester miscarriage — a concern he never voiced publicly.
- Johnson is not merely alleging a gap between private and public statements; he is accusing federal health officials of deliberate statistical manipulation to conceal an 82% miscarriage rate among women vaccinated in their first or second trimester.
- The statistical reinterpretation Johnson presents diverges sharply from how the original New England Journal of Medicine researchers framed their own findings, raising questions about whose reading of the data holds.
- With Fauci's legal team silent, a contempt referral to the DOJ already underway via Senator Rand Paul, and Johnson warning that more damaging communications are still being reviewed, the investigation shows no sign of narrowing.
- At the center of the storm are the pregnant women who made medical decisions based on public guidance — and who now find themselves at the intersection of a political reckoning and an unresolved scientific question.
In the long and contested history of public health communication, the distance between private doubt and public assurance has always carried moral weight. Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin now claims that newly released text messages from Dr. Anthony Fauci's government phone reveal that weight was carried in secret — that concerns about mRNA vaccine risks during early pregnancy were expressed privately to colleagues in January 2021, even as the public was told the vaccines were safe. Whether this constitutes deception or the ordinary caution of scientists navigating uncertainty in real time, the question it raises is ancient: what do those entrusted with public guidance owe the people they guide?
Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin has released text messages from Dr. Anthony Fauci's government phone, obtained through his chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, and is arguing they reveal a troubling gap between what Fauci said privately and what he told the public about vaccine safety during pregnancy.
The messages, sent in January 2021 to CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and then-incoming Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, show Fauci raising a theoretical concern: that the significant cytokine storms and fevers some people experienced after their second vaccine dose could potentially be associated with miscarriage in the first trimester. Johnson contends that this private acknowledgment of risk was never honestly communicated to the public — and that pregnant women were instead encouraged, pressured, and in some cases mandated to receive what he called "an experimental gene therapy."
To bolster his case, Johnson reinterprets a June 2021 study published in the New England Journal of Medicine. The study tracked 827 pregnancies exposed to mRNA vaccines, recording 104 spontaneous abortions. Johnson argues that because 700 of those women were vaccinated in the third trimester — a period Fauci had not flagged as concerning — the miscarriages should be calculated only against the 127 women vaccinated in the first or second trimester. By that math, he arrives at an 82 percent miscarriage rate, a figure that diverges substantially from how the study's own authors presented their findings.
Johnson described the texts as only the beginning, saying his staff continues to work through the full contents of Fauci's phone and expects to find further evidence of private concerns contradicting public messaging. The investigation runs parallel to Senator Rand Paul's effort to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress — now referred to the Department of Justice — after Fauci repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment during questioning. Fauci's legal representatives have not responded publicly to the latest allegations.
Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin has obtained text messages from Dr. Anthony Fauci's government phone dating to January 2021, and he is now arguing they expose a fundamental disconnect between what the nation's top infectious disease official said in private and what he told the public about vaccine safety in pregnancy.
The texts, which Johnson released on Monday as chair of the Senate Homeland Security Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, show Fauci expressing concern to CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and future Surgeon General Vivek Murthy about a theoretical risk. Fauci wrote that because some people experienced significant cytokine storms and fever after the second vaccine dose, this could theoretically be associated with miscarriage in the first trimester. Johnson obtained the phone as part of a broader investigation into Fauci's tenure, conducted alongside Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky.
Johnson's interpretation of these messages is stark. He argues that Fauci and other federal health officials knew the vaccines posed risks to pregnant women but concealed or minimized those concerns in their public statements. "We tell pregnant women don't even have a glass of wine and yet we coerce them, convince them, sometimes mandated them, to get an experimental gene therapy as early as the first trimester," Johnson said in an interview with Fox News Digital. "This is truly sick."
To support his argument, Johnson points to a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in June 2021 by Dr. Tom Shimabukoro. The study tracked 827 pregnancies exposed to mRNA vaccines. Of those, 104 resulted in what the study termed spontaneous abortions. But Johnson reframes the data. He notes that 700 of the 827 women received their vaccination in the third trimester, while only 127 received it in the first or second trimester—the period when Fauci had expressed concern. Of the 104 miscarriages, Johnson argues, all occurred in the smaller group. This yields what he calculates as an 82 percent miscarriage rate among women vaccinated in the first two trimesters. "They knew it," Johnson said of federal health officials. "They're not that stupid. They're just that devious to play with the statistics that way to misinform, to lie to the American public."
Johnson frames the released texts as preliminary. He said his staff is still working through the contents of Fauci's phone and that he expects to find additional communications showing private concerns at odds with public messaging. "This is going to take time," he said, "but when my staff saw this, I mean, to me, this immediately impacts public safety, immediately impacts informed consent." He called the current release "just the tip of the iceberg."
The investigation comes as Paul has moved to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress for repeatedly invoking the Fifth Amendment during questioning. That effort has now been handed to the Department of Justice. Fauci's legal representatives did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The texts themselves remain the only direct evidence Johnson has presented of Fauci's private views, and his statistical reinterpretation of the published pregnancy data differs significantly from how the original researchers presented their findings.
Citações Notáveis
We tell pregnant women don't even have a glass of wine and yet we coerce them, convince them, sometimes mandated them, to get an experimental gene therapy as early as the first trimester. This is truly sick.— Senator Ron Johnson
Since many people have significant cytokines storm and fever after the 2nd dose, this theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester.— Dr. Anthony Fauci, in January 2021 text message
Quer a matéria completa?
Leia o original em Fox News ↗
Politics & Governance