In the forests of northern Finland, the pace of the digital age has outrun the patience of the land. Google, in its rush to build two vast datacentres near Muhos and Kajaani, cleared over 500 hectares of forest before completing the environmental assessments the law requires — leaving behind, in the words of those who witnessed it, little more than sand. Finnish regulators have now ordered a halt, giving the company until October 23 to comply, and the episode stands as a quiet parable about what is lost when the urgency of infrastructure meets the slowness of stewardship.
Google halts Finland datacentre work over missing environmental assessments
It is not a forest any more. It is a sand area.
Mark
So Google was just clearing forest without asking permission first?
Mimi
Not exactly permission—they needed to complete an environmental impact assessment before doing the preparatory work. They did the clearing anyway.
Luke
But did they know they needed the assessment? Or did they genuinely misunderstand the rules?
Mimi
Google says they acted in good faith under the Forestry Act. They did run nature surveys and protected some areas. But the regulator is clear: you can't do extensive site prep—removing trees, stripping soil, building roads—before the assessment is done.
Mark
What happens now?
Mimi
They have until October 23 to stop the work. The assessment is still ongoing, expected to finish later this year.
Luke
And if they don't stop?
Mimi
Enforcement proceedings and fines. The regulator was explicit about that.
Mark
Why did this happen at two sites?
Mimi
The conservation group called it systemic—a sign of how much pressure companies are under to build datacentres fast. Finland is in huge demand for server space.
Luke
Is that an excuse or an explanation?
Mimi
It's an explanation for why it happened. Whether it's an excuse depends on what you think Google should have known and done differently.
Le Pouls
- More than 530 hectares of Finnish forest were felled and stripped to bare ground before Google had fulfilled its legal obligation to assess the environmental consequences.
- Conservation groups say the damage at Muhos is irreversible in the short term — a forest reduced to a sand field, its topsoil gone and its roads already cut.
- Finnish regulators issued a formal suspension notice, demanding all environment-altering work cease by October 23 or face enforcement proceedings and financial penalties.
- Google acknowledged falling short of its own standards, cited good-faith compliance with forestry law, and pledged to plant trees across 130 hectares as a partial remedy.
- Experts warn this is not an isolated lapse but a systemic failure — small municipalities lack the expertise and bandwidth to regulate the breakneck speed of the global datacentre boom.
In the forests of northern Finland, the pace of the digital age has outrun the patience of the land. Google, in its rush to build two vast datacentres near Muhos and Kajaani, cleared over 500 hectares of forest before completing the environmental assessments the law requires — leaving behind, in the words of those who witnessed it, little more than sand. Finnish regulators have now ordered a halt, giving the company until October 23 to comply, and the episode stands as a quiet parable about what is lost when the urgency of infrastructure meets the slowness of stewardship.
Google has been ordered to suspend construction on two datacentres in northern Finland after regulators found that its subsidiary, Tuike Finland Oy, had cleared hundreds of hectares of forest without completing legally required environmental impact assessments. The sites in Muhos and Kajaani are part of a €13 billion expansion intended to anchor the company's server infrastructure across the Nordic region.
The scale of the clearing went well beyond tree removal. At Muhos, 330 hectares were felled; at Kajaani, nearly 200 more. Topsoil was stripped, access roads were built, and the landscape was fundamentally transformed before the environmental review process had concluded. Conservationists described what remained at Muhos in stark terms: no longer a forest, but a sand area.
Finland's Licensing and Supervision Authority issued a formal notice requiring Google to halt all work that significantly alters the environment at both sites by October 23, and to submit a written explanation within days. Non-compliance would trigger enforcement proceedings and fines. Google responded by acknowledging it had fallen short of its own standards, while noting it had acted in good faith under the Forestry Act and conducted nature surveys. The company also committed to planting trees across 130 hectares at Muhos.
For Tapani Veistola of the Finnish Association for Nature Conservation, the violations point to something deeper than corporate negligence. The datacentre market is expanding so rapidly that companies feel immense pressure to build at speed, and smaller municipalities simply do not have the regulatory expertise to keep pace. The result is a structural gap — one where environmental safeguards designed for a slower world are quietly bypassed in the race to build the infrastructure of a faster one.
Google has been ordered to stop work on two datacentres in Finland after regulators discovered the company had cleared vast stretches of forest without completing the environmental assessments required by law. The halt affects construction sites in Muhos and Kajaani, both part of a €13 billion expansion across northern Finland designed to house the massive server infrastructure that powers the company's global operations.
The problem came to light when it emerged that Tuike Finland Oy, Google's subsidiary managing the project, had felled 330 hectares of forest in Muhos and logged nearly 200 hectares in Kajaani without first finishing an environmental impact assessment. The work went beyond simple tree removal—the company had stripped topsoil, constructed site roads, and undertaken what regulators called "extensive preparatory measures" that fundamentally altered the landscape. Conservationists described what remained as little more than sand.
On Tuesday, the Finnish Licensing and Supervision Authority issued a formal notice requiring Google to suspend all work that "significantly changes the environment" at both sites by October 23. The company was given until the following Wednesday to provide a written explanation for why it had proceeded without completing the required environmental impact assessment, which remains ongoing and is expected to finish later this year. If Google fails to comply, regulators said they would pursue enforcement proceedings and impose fines.
Tommi Muilu, head of the environmental department at the authority, explained the reasoning plainly: the measures in question would change the environment and cause impacts that the assessment process was designed to identify and evaluate. Google's response acknowledged the misstep. In a statement, the company said it "fell short of our own high standards" and promised to study the regulator's findings and follow their guidance. Google also noted it had acted in good faith under the Forestry Act, conducted nature surveys, and protected high-value areas. The company added that it plans to plant trees across 130 hectares at Muhos as part of broader landscaping and biodiversity efforts.
Tapani Veistola, chief operating officer of the Finnish Association for Nature Conservation, characterized the violations at both sites as evidence of a "systemic problem." He described the Muhos site bluntly: "It is not a forest any more. It is a sand area." The root cause, he suggested, lay not in deliberate wrongdoing but in the market forces driving the datacentre boom. Demand for server capacity in Finland is so intense that companies are racing to build as quickly as possible, overwhelming the capacity of small municipalities to manage the process. Expertise gaps in local government, combined with the sheer speed companies feel pressured to maintain, create conditions where environmental safeguards get bypassed. The incident reflects a broader tension: as the world's digital infrastructure expands at unprecedented pace, the regulatory systems meant to protect the environment struggle to keep up.
Citations marquantes
The measures in question will change the environment and cause impacts, the identification and assessment of which are among the key objectives of the EIA procedure.— Tommi Muilu, head of environmental department, Finnish Licensing and Supervision Authority
We fell short of our own high standards. We will study the LVV's findings and follow their guidance.— Google, in statement
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur The Guardian ↗
Business