For two centuries, millions of Germans fled poverty, famine, and failed harvests to begin again in foreign lands — facing suspicion, discrimination, and the same accusations of cultural stubbornness now directed at those arriving in Germany today. The nation that once exported its desperate and its hopeful has become, quietly and uncomfortably, a country of immigration, with more than a third of its population carrying migrant roots. Yet Germany has never fully made peace with that transformation, leaving millions in legal and social limbo while public debate fixates on a fraction of arrivals.
Germany's forgotten emigration history complicates modern immigration debate
They don't belong, because they'll leave again and disappear
So Germany spent centuries sending its own people away, and now it's struggling to accept people coming in. That's the basic shape of it?
Yes, but it's more than just irony. The conditions those German emigrants faced—the disease, the family separations, the forced labor—those were genuinely brutal. And the rhetoric used against them then sounds identical to what's said about immigrants now.
But we should be careful here. Franklin's comments are real, but how representative were they? Was that the dominant view in America at the time, or was it one prominent voice?
That's fair. The source doesn't tell us how widespread anti-German sentiment actually was. What we do know is that millions of Germans did emigrate successfully and eventually integrated.
And Catherine the Great's offer to Germans in Russia—that was a completely different model. She was actively recruiting them, promising they could keep their language and culture.
Right. She saw them as an asset, not a threat. She wanted them to develop land and build communities. The contrast with how Germany now treats migrants is striking.
Though we should note: Catherine's offer was in the 18th century. By the 19th century, things changed. The source doesn't detail what happened to those German communities in Russia over time.
The guest worker program is the real pivot point, isn't it? Germany needed labor, brought in millions of people, then acted shocked when some of them stayed.
Exactly. The government called them "guest workers"—the word itself was a denial. It was a legal fiction that allowed Germany to avoid thinking of itself as an immigration country.
Though to be precise, the source says around 3 million out of 14 million stayed. So the majority did leave, which means the "guest" framing wasn't entirely false—it just wasn't the whole story.
And now 30 percent of the population has a migrant background, but many still don't feel they belong.
Because the society never actually decided to welcome them. It just happened, and the country kept pretending it wasn't happening.
The asylum debate is interesting too—only 10 percent of immigration is asylum-related, but it dominates the conversation. That's a real distortion, but it's worth asking why that distortion exists. What is it about asylum that makes it so politically charged?
Il Polso
- The rhetoric used today against migrants in Germany echoes almost word-for-word what Benjamin Franklin wrote about German immigrants in 18th-century America — a historical irony that cuts to the heart of the current debate.
- Millions of 19th-century Germans emigrated under desperate conditions — disease-ridden voyages, bonded labor, family separation — yet their descendants have largely forgotten what it meant to be the unwanted stranger.
- Germany recruited over 14 million 'guest workers' after World War II while officially insisting they were temporary, creating a decades-long contradiction between economic need and political identity.
- Today, asylum seekers represent barely 10 percent of immigration to Germany yet consume nearly all of the public's attention, distorting the national conversation in ways experts call a 'massive' misrepresentation.
- With over 30 percent of the population holding migrant backgrounds and many third-generation residents still feeling they don't belong, Germany faces mounting pressure to decide — deliberately and honestly — what kind of society it intends to be.
For two centuries, millions of Germans fled poverty, famine, and failed harvests to begin again in foreign lands — facing suspicion, discrimination, and the same accusations of cultural stubbornness now directed at those arriving in Germany today. The nation that once exported its desperate and its hopeful has become, quietly and uncomfortably, a country of immigration, with more than a third of its population carrying migrant roots. Yet Germany has never fully made peace with that transformation, leaving millions in legal and social limbo while public debate fixates on a fraction of arrivals. History, it seems, is asking Germany a question it has long avoided answering about itself.
Germany's current immigration anxieties carry an uncomfortable echo. Benjamin Franklin, in the 18th century, wrote with open hostility about German immigrants flooding American settlements, clinging to their language and refusing to assimilate. His words could be lifted wholesale into today's political discourse — except the people he was condemning were Germans themselves, fleeing poverty and persecution in search of the life his own Declaration of Independence had promised.
The early crossings were brutal. Families sold everything to afford passage on ships where dysentery, typhoid, and scurvy spread through the lower decks. Those who survived often arrived to find themselves auctioned into bonded labor, their families split apart. By the 19th century, as Germany's population swelled and harvests failed, around 6 million Germans had concluded there was no future at home. They joined a broader European exodus — some 60 million people leaving the continent between 1800 and World War I.
The direction reversed after 1945. West Germany's postwar economic boom created a hunger for labor that the country could not satisfy alone. Beginning in 1956, trains brought Italians, Greeks, Turks, and others to German cities under the 'guest worker' program — a name that encoded the official assumption: they were temporary, and they would leave. By 1973, roughly 14 million had come. Around 3 million stayed. Germany still declined to call itself an immigration country.
Today, more than 30 percent of Germany's population has a migrant background, yet many third- and fourth-generation residents report never feeling they truly belong. Asylum seekers — who represent barely 10 percent of all immigration — dominate a public debate that migration researcher Jochen Oltmer describes as severely distorted by fear and negative imagery. Meanwhile, millions of long-term residents exist without stable legal status, in a kind of permanent provisional limbo.
Oltmer argues that Germany cannot continue to avoid the fundamental question: what does it actually want its society to look like? The descendants of the Germans Franklin once mocked as 'Palatine boors' integrated fully into America over generations. Whether Germany can extend the same patience — and honesty — to those who have arrived on its own shores remains, he says, an urgent and unresolved matter. 'It may be a very hard, even hurtful discussion,' he has said. 'But it's the only way.'
Germany's immigration debate is dominated by anxiety about outsiders who won't fit in, who cling to their own language and customs, who refuse to become truly German. The irony is sharp and uncomfortable: these exact accusations were leveled at Germans themselves, centuries ago, by someone who helped found the United States.
Benjamin Franklin, in the 18th century, wrote scathingly about German immigrants arriving in America. "Why should they be suffered to swarm into our Settlements, and by herding together establish their Language and Manners to the Exclusion of ours?" he asked. "They will shortly be so numerous and will never adopt our Language or Customs." The words sound like they could have come from today's right-wing populist Alternative for Germany party. Except the people Franklin was condemning were Germans—people fleeing their homeland in search of the happiness and prosperity promised by the American Declaration of Independence, which Franklin himself had helped write.
The early German emigration to America was smaller than the later waves. By 1820, roughly 150,000 Germans had made the crossing. They were often recruited by compatriots who had already settled, men who sent back stories of tremendous success and prosperity—stories that conveniently omitted the fact that these recruiters earned a commission for every person they convinced to leave. The cost of passage on a sailing ship was enormous: about what a skilled tradesman earned in an entire year. Families had to sell everything they owned to afford it. What awaited them on the other side was a nightmare. The voyage took weeks. Below deck, packed into confined spaces, passengers were infested with bedbugs, fleas, and rats. Dysentery, typhoid, smallpox, and scurvy spread rapidly. Gottlieb Mittelberger, a schoolmaster and organist who made the journey in 1750, wrote that "many hundred people necessarily die and perish in such misery, and must be cast into the sea." Those who survived arrival in America often found themselves auctioned off as bonded laborers, their contracts sold to the highest bidder. Families were torn apart. Parents sold their children.
While Germans were sailing west to America, others were moving east. In 1763, Catherine the Great, herself a German princess, issued a manifesto inviting Germans to settle in Russia. She offered free transport, free land, tax exemptions for the first year, schooling, exemption from military service, and the right to maintain their language and largely govern themselves. It was an extraordinarily generous offer, and thousands accepted.
But America remained the primary destination. In the 19th century, Germany's population nearly doubled. The job market collapsed. Failed harvests and famines made survival uncertain. Around 6 million Germans decided they had no future at home and no future for their children. They emigrated to the New World. Between the start of the 19th century and World War I, roughly 60 million Europeans left their homelands altogether, according to migration researcher Jochen Oltmer. Europe was a continent of emigration, not immigration.
That changed after World War II. In the 1950s and 1960s, West Germany experienced an "economic miracle." The country needed workers. Beginning in 1956, trains arrived at stations in Stuttgart, Dortmund, and Cologne carrying Italians, Greeks, Spaniards, Portuguese, Yugoslavs, and Turks—people drawn by the promise of well-paid jobs. They were called "guest workers," a term that revealed the official mindset: they were temporary, they would eventually leave, they did not belong. By 1973, when the government banned further recruitment of foreign labor, roughly 14 million people had come to West Germany as guest workers. Around 3 million stayed permanently. Yet Germany still refused to think of itself as an immigration country. "For a very long time, we were dealing with the mindset: It doesn't matter why people came to the Federal Republic; they don't belong, because in any case they'll leave the country again and disappear," Oltmer said.
Today, more than 30 percent of Germany's population has a migrant background, according to the Federal Statistical Office. Yet many third- and fourth-generation citizens still do not feel they belong—a reflection of how society has treated them. Germany now actively recruits skilled workers from abroad. Refugees are granted asylum only if they face political persecution or are fleeing war. Asylum seekers account for barely 10 percent of all immigration to Germany, yet they dominate the public debate. "When it comes to scandalization and the creation of certain negative images, we are seeing a massive distortion of the debate," Oltmer said. The descendants of the Germans whom Benjamin Franklin once scorned as "Palatine boors" have long since integrated perfectly into American society. In Germany, integration is moving far more slowly. Many migrants have no stable legal status, even though everyone knows they will stay. Oltmer believes the country faces an urgent choice: it must sit down and decide what it actually wants German society to look like in the future. "It may be a very hard, even hurtful discussion," he said. "But it's the only way."
Citazioni salienti
For a very long time, we were dealing with the mindset: It doesn't matter why people came to the Federal Republic; they don't belong, because in any case they'll leave the country again and disappear.— Jochen Oltmer, migration researcher at the Institute for Migration Research and Intercultural Studies in Osnabrück
Many people have no possibility of regularizing their status and obtaining a stable residence permit, even though everyone involved knows they can stay, and will stay.— Jochen Oltmer