At the United Nations General Assembly, Germany placed itself among a small but growing group of nations willing to name a date for the end of fossil fuels — 2045 — framing the decision not merely as a climate obligation but as a reckoning with economic fragility and geopolitical exposure. Environment Minister Carsten Schneider invoked the Iran war and a €76 billion annual import bill to argue that dependence on foreign fuel is itself a form of vulnerability. The announcement is significant, yet the distance between a roadmap presented in New York and the subsidies, delays, and internal disagr
Germany unveils 2045 fossil fuel phaseout plan, joining France and Netherlands
When fuel access determines your commute, something has gone wrong
Mark
So Germany is the third country to actually lay out a timeline. What makes that significant?
Mimi
It's the difference between a promise and a plan. Nearly 200 countries said they'd phase out fossil fuels at COP28, but most haven't said how or when. Germany, France, and the Netherlands have now put dates on it. For Germany, it's 2045.
Luke
But what does the plan actually contain? The article says it's a roadmap, but I don't see the specific policies—the investments, the regulations, the enforcement mechanisms.
Mimi
That's fair. The article focuses on the announcement and the political context, not the technical details of the roadmap itself. Schneider framed it around energy independence and cost, which is interesting because it's not purely a climate argument.
Mark
Why did he bring up the Iran war?
Mimi
Because Germany imports 98 percent of its oil and 95 percent of its natural gas. When the Strait of Hormuz is contested, German energy prices spike. He's saying: this isn't just about polar bears. It's about your heating bill and your commute.
Luke
The cost figure—€76 billion a year—is that just for oil and gas, or all energy imports?
Mimi
The article says it's for oil and natural gas specifically. And Schneider noted it's risen since the conflict began.
Mark
So why are environmental groups saying the government is contradicting itself?
Mimi
Because while announcing the phaseout, the government is still subsidizing oil companies, delaying renewable energy expansion, and the Energy Minister is pushing for new gas plants. It's like saying you're quitting smoking while buying cigarettes.
Luke
Is that a fair characterization, or is there a legitimate reason to build gas plants as a bridge fuel?
Mimi
The Energy Minister argues gas is necessary for grid stability because wind and solar are intermittent. That's a real technical argument. But it does seem to undercut the urgency of the phaseout.
Mark
And the car industry conflict—that's about the 2035 target for electric vehicles?
Mimi
Yes. The plan says 100 percent of new cars sold should be battery-electric by 2035. But the Energy Minister wants to preserve a role for combustion engines using alternative fuels. Germany's auto industry is huge and struggling, so there's real political pressure to soften that target.
Luke
The article doesn't say what alternative fuels she's talking about. Synthetic fuels? Hydrogen? That matters for whether it's actually a contradiction or a different pathway.
Mimi
True. The article leaves that unclear. But the point is the government is sending mixed signals on how fast the transition should be.
Le Pouls
- Germany's fossil fuel phaseout pledge carries unusual urgency: disrupted Middle East supply chains have already pushed import costs higher, making energy dependence a daily economic reality for households and industry alike.
- The announcement landed with immediate friction — environmental groups welcomed the headline while pointing to a government that simultaneously subsidizes oil, stalls heating reforms, and slows renewable expansion.
- Inside the coalition, Energy Minister Reiche is actively pushing for new gas plants and combustion-engine flexibility, placing her in direct conflict with the phaseout roadmap her own government unveiled.
- Germany's automotive sector — economically central and already under strain — looms over the 2035 all-electric car target, with industry players resisting a hard shift away from alternative-fuel combustion engines.
- The roadmap now joins similar plans from France and the Netherlands, but critics note it largely repackages existing commitments rather than introducing new mechanisms to close the gap between ambition and action.
At the United Nations General Assembly, Germany placed itself among a small but growing group of nations willing to name a date for the end of fossil fuels — 2045 — framing the decision not merely as a climate obligation but as a reckoning with economic fragility and geopolitical exposure. Environment Minister Carsten Schneider invoked the Iran war and a €76 billion annual import bill to argue that dependence on foreign fuel is itself a form of vulnerability. The announcement is significant, yet the distance between a roadmap presented in New York and the subsidies, delays, and internal disagreements unfolding at home reminds us that in the long arc of energy transition, declarations are only the beginning.
Germany announced this week a plan to eliminate coal, oil, and natural gas by 2045, becoming the third country after France and the Netherlands to translate the fossil fuel phaseout pledge made at COP28 into a concrete national roadmap. Environment Minister Carsten Schneider presented the plan at the UN General Assembly, arguing that the case for transition is as much about economic survival as climate responsibility.
Schneider, a Social Democrat, grounded his argument in hard numbers and recent geopolitics. With 98 percent of Germany's oil and 95 percent of its natural gas imported at a cost of €76 billion annually, and with the Iran war further straining global supply chains, he framed fossil fuel dependence as a strategic liability. The 19-year timeline, he said, is realistic and should inspire other nations to follow.
Environmental groups offered cautious praise shadowed by skepticism. Greenpeace's Mira Jäger welcomed Germany's continued international engagement but pointed to ongoing oil subsidies, stalled heating transitions, and slowing renewable buildout as signs of contradiction. WWF advisor Fentje Jacobsen went further, arguing the roadmap breaks little new ground beyond commitments already on record.
The deeper tension lies within the government itself. Energy Minister Katherina Reiche of the CDU has championed new gas-fired power plants as a grid stability necessity and resisted the plan's 2035 target for 100 percent battery-electric new car registrations — a position shaped in part by anxiety over Germany's struggling automotive sector. The gap between what ministers declare abroad and what they permit at home will ultimately decide whether 2045 is a destination or simply a date.
Germany announced this week that it will phase out coal, oil, and natural gas by 2045, becoming the third country to detail a concrete plan for the fossil fuel elimination that nearly 200 nations pledged to pursue at the 2023 climate conference in Dubai. Environment Minister Carsten Schneider presented the roadmap to the UN General Assembly on Wednesday, framing it as a matter of both climate necessity and economic self-interest.
Schneider, a member of the center-left Social Democratic Party, tied the phaseout directly to geopolitical vulnerability. He pointed to the Iran war and its disruption of global fuel supplies as a stark reminder that dependence on fossil fuels leaves a country exposed to forces beyond its control. When access to oil determines whether workers can afford their daily commute, he argued, something has gone wrong. The 19-year timeline to full phaseout, he said, is achievable and should serve as a model for other nations.
The numbers underlying Germany's position are substantial. In 2024, fossil fuels accounted for 65 percent of the country's total energy consumption. Nearly all of that came from abroad: 98 percent of its oil and 95 percent of its natural gas were imported, costing €76 billion annually. Schneider noted that this figure has climbed further since the conflict in the Middle East began disrupting supply chains. The minister characterized the plan as combining three imperatives: independence from volatile global markets, affordability for households and industry, and the climate protection that extreme weather events now demand.
Environmental organizations have offered a mixed response. Greenpeace's energy expert Mira Jäger welcomed the announcement as a sign that Germany remains engaged in international climate leadership. Yet she immediately noted a contradiction: while unveiling this phaseout plan, the federal government continues to subsidize the oil industry, has stalled progress on heating system transitions, and is slowing the expansion of renewable energy capacity. Fentje Jacobsen, a climate policy advisor at the World Wide Fund for Nature, was more skeptical, arguing that the roadmap largely restates commitments already on the books without introducing genuinely new ambitions or strategies.
The internal tensions within Germany's government are real and substantive. Energy Minister Katherina Reiche, from the conservative Christian Democratic Union, has pushed for construction of new gas-fired power plants, contending that natural gas is necessary to stabilize the electricity grid given the intermittent output of wind and solar installations. She has also advocated preserving a larger role for combustion-engine vehicles powered by alternative fuels—a position that directly conflicts with the phaseout plan's target of 100 percent battery-electric cars among new passenger vehicle registrations by 2035.
These disagreements reflect deeper anxieties about Germany's automotive sector, which remains central to the country's economic identity and export strength. The industry has struggled in recent years, and those difficulties have rippled through the broader economy. The tension between the government's climate commitments and its reluctance to impose rapid change on a cornerstone industry reveals the genuine difficulty of the transition ahead. Germany has now joined France and the Netherlands in articulating a detailed path away from fossil fuels, but the gap between announcement and implementation—between what ministers say in New York and what they allow at home—will determine whether the 2045 target becomes reality or remains aspirational.
Citations marquantes
The plan combines independence, affordability, and climate protection, with the 19-year deadline feasible and intended to set an international example— Environment Minister Carsten Schneider
The government is subsidizing the oil industry, breaking the heating transition, and slowing renewable expansion while announcing a phaseout— Greenpeace energy expert Mira Jäger
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur Deutsche Welle ↗
Climate & Environment