Germany Tightens Biomass Rules Under RED III, Ending 'Protection of Trust' for Biofuel Certificates

A certificate could not be withdrawn, even if fraud surfaced later
Germany is abolishing the 'protection of trust' rule that shielded biofuel certificates after issuance.
Mark

Why does ending the 'protection of trust' rule matter so much?

Mimi

Before, a certificate stood even if fraud came out later. Now mis-declared biofuels can be excluded from quota counting, so a fraudulent certificate no longer keeps its value.

Mark

What set this off?

Mimi

A scandal from 2023, when advanced biofuels from China counted toward the GHG quota were suspected of being mislabelled.

Luke

Suspected is the operative word. The reporting says mislabelling was suspected; it doesn't give us a confirmed scale or outcome.

Mark

And the industry's reaction?

Mimi

The VDB welcomed it. Its managing director, Elmar Baumann, said three years of fraud had held back investment in charging infrastructure, hydrogen, e-fuels and new biofuels.

Luke

That's one association's account of the damage. No figure is given for how much investment was held back.

Mark

What changes for power plants?

Mimi

Required GHG savings go from 70% to 80% for plants commissioned after 20 November 2023. Older EEG-supported plants stay under RED II rules, mostly with no calculations until the end of 2030.

Luke

Worth noting the biomass picture underneath is murky. The government itself says it lacks a full overview of how much biomass is produced or used for energy, and it has no plan for a national strategy.

  • A fraud scandal over supposedly advanced biofuels from China has left the quota system exposed, and the market is waiting to see how far the cleanup will go.
  • Abolishing the 'protection of trust' rule means certificates can now be withdrawn retroactively, shaking confidence among producers who relied on earlier paperwork.
  • Power plants commissioned after 20 November 2023 must now reach 80% GHG savings, while older plants face calculations only at the end of 2030, creating a split in obligations.
  • The government missed Germany's RED III transposition deadline of May 2025, and industry groups warn operators of older plants are still unsure which rules apply to them.
  • With no National Biomass Strategy planned and no complete overview of biomass volumes, the rules are landing on a system that still lacks a map of its own resources.

On the last day of October, Germany's federal cabinet gave its approval to a set of rules that bring the European Union's revised renewable energy directive into national law, a step that reaches into both the fuels that move vehicles and the biomass that feeds power plants. The changes respond to a scandal of mislabelled advanced biofuels that clouded the market for years, and they replace a long-standing protection for certificate holders with a regime where fraud can be undone after the fact. Behind the administrative language lies an older human question of how a society can trust what it burns and what it claims to be burning clean. The approval arrives late, after the European deadline has already passed, and it sits alongside an acknowledgment that the country still lacks a full picture of its own biomass use.

On 28 October, Germany's federal cabinet approved changes to two sustainability ordinances, one for biofuels and one for biomass electricity. Together they write the requirements of the EU's revised Renewable Energy Directive into German law. The environment ministry, BMUKN, pushed the work forward, with biodiversity protection as its stated purpose. The ordinances skip the Bundesrat and take effect the day after publication in the Federal Law Gazette.

The biofuel changes grew out of a 2023 scandal, when advanced biofuels from China counted toward Germany's quota were suspected of being mislabelled. The central fix abolishes the "protection of trust" rule, which had barred retroactive withdrawal of sustainability certificates even after fraud was found. Mis-declared fuels will now be excluded from quota counting, and certificates must be transferred or submitted within three years. Certification bodies face stricter duties, and the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food gains fuller supply chain data and inspection rights.

Industry welcomed the move. The German Biofuels Industry Association said three years of fraud had held back investment in charging infrastructure, green hydrogen, e-fuels and new biofuels. On the electricity side, the required GHG savings rise from 70% to 80% for plants commissioned after 20 November 2023, while older subsidised plants remain under earlier rules. Solid biomass plants of 7.5MW and above now fall under certification, and new clarifications aim to protect old-growth forests, heathland and peatland.

The approval comes late. Germany missed its May 2025 transposition deadline, and operators of older plants were left guessing. The government has also confirmed it has no current plans for a National Biomass Strategy, and it admitted it lacks a complete picture of how much biomass the country produces or burns for energy. Publication in the Federal Law Gazette is the next step.

On 28 October, Germany's federal cabinet approved amendments to two of the country's sustainability ordinances: the Biofuel Sustainability Ordinance, known as Biokraft-NachV, and the Biomass Electricity Sustainability Ordinance, BioSt-NachV. Together they write the sustainability requirements of the EU's revised Renewable Energy Directive, RED III, into German law. The changes give authorities new powers against certificate fraud in the biofuels market and raise the greenhouse gas savings that bioenergy power plants must meet.

The environment ministry, BMUKN, led the work. Its stated aim is to make sure that using biomass for energy does not harm the environment, biodiversity in particular. The ordinances do not need approval from the Bundesrat, Germany's upper house, and take effect the day after they are published in the Federal Law Gazette.

The biofuel changes answer a scandal that surfaced in 2023, when advanced biofuels from China counted toward Germany's GHG quota were suspected of being mislabelled. The central remedy is abolishing the "protection of trust" rule. Under it, a sustainability certificate could not be withdrawn retroactively, even if fraud was found after issuance. Now mis-declared biofuels will be excluded from quota counting, and sustainability certificates must be transferred or submitted to the German biofuel quota authority within three years.

Certification bodies face tighter requirements too. The Federal Office for Agriculture and Food, BLE, gains access to detailed supply chain information, plus its own rights to inspect and control. Once the EU's Union Database, which tracks liquid and gaseous fuels along the supply chain, is operational, using it becomes mandatory.

The German Biofuels Industry Association, VDB, welcomed the decision. Managing director Elmar Baumann said three years of fraud involving supposedly advanced biofuels had held back substantial investment in charging infrastructure, green hydrogen, e-fuels and new biofuels.

For electricity, the required GHG savings rise from 70% to 80% for installations commissioned after 20 November 2023. Existing plants that received EEG support before that date stay under the earlier RED II GHG rules, and in most cases will not have to carry out GHG calculations until the end of 2030. As Bioenergy Insight reported earlier, BioSt-NachV also extends sustainability certification to solid biomass power plants of 7.5MW and above, down from 20MW, with a transitional period for certification. The amendments also clarify requirements for wood-based residues, with the aim of strengthening protection for old-growth forests and sensitive areas such as heathland and peatland.

When the draft went to the European Commission in July, the Federal Bioenergy Association, BBE, welcomed the removal of forestry definitions that would have gone beyond RED III. It criticised the absence of additional default values and simplified GHG calculation methods, and objected to Germany's decision not to use RED III's option of a simplified verification system for plants between 7.5 and 20MW.

The approval comes late. Germany's deadline for transposing RED III's bioenergy sustainability provisions passed in May 2025, and industry groups had warned that the delay left operators of older plants unsure which requirements applied to them. It also follows the government's confirmation that it has no current plans for a National Biomass Strategy, NABIS, which was meant to prioritise limited biomass across power, heat, transport and materials. In an answer to a Left Party parliamentary question published on 14 October, the government said biomass remains important to its climate and energy security goals and expects demand for biogenic fuels in heating to keep rising. It acknowledged, however, that it has no complete overview of how much biomass Germany produces or how much goes to energy. Publication in the Federal Law Gazette is the next step.

Three years of fraud involving supposedly advanced biofuels held back substantial investment in charging infrastructure, green hydrogen, e-fuels and new biofuels.
— Elmar Baumann, managing director, German Biofuels Industry Association (VDB), paraphrased
Fale Conosco FAQ