Germany Still Searching for Nuclear Waste Site as Finland Leads With First Final Repository

The garbage is outside, but there is no landfill to take it to.
Germany's waste remains in interim storage while the search for a deep repository continues.
Mark

Finland finished first. What does that actually mean?

Mimi

It approved the world's first final repository, 400 meters down on an island in the west, beside one of its two nuclear plants. The project took around 40 years.

Mark

And Germany's position?

Mimi

Almost ten years into the search. The agency, BGE, says only 5% of the country, across 11 states, is still in play. The target for naming a site is 2050.

Luke

That 2050 is a hope, not a commitment. The article says Germany hopes to identify a site by then, and the environment minister wants to see if it can be faster.

Mark

The ministry says Germany is among the leaders.

Mimi

Spokesperson Haufe said Russia, the US, the UK and Japan are behind. Finland is fastest.

Luke

Worth noting that's the government describing its own standing. The piece doesn't give an independent ranking.

Mark

Why a million years in Germany but 100,000 in Finland?

Mimi

Dehmer gave those figures as the required safety horizons. The source doesn't explain the difference, only that the analysis is enormous either way.

Luke

Right, so we can't say why. Same with the €14 billion: it's an expert estimate, not a contract price.

Mark

What does Finland's trust have to do with it?

Mimi

Dehmer credits high public trust and respect for the regulator STUK, and says Germany should stay consistent and patient.

Luke

That's her belief, and it's an interpretation. Whether trust caused the speed isn't something the reporting demonstrates.

  • Finland has approved the world's first final repository, 400 meters underground beside a nuclear plant, and the rest of the nuclear world is watching it as a benchmark.
  • Germany's federal agency BGE has cut the search to 5% of national territory spread across 11 states, and every remaining region knows it may be next.
  • Interim storage at former reactor sites costs about €1.4 billion a year, so every year of delay adds real financial strain.
  • Environment Minister Carsten Schneider is asking whether the timeline to 2050 can be shortened without compromising safety or public trust.
  • The final repository is estimated at €14 billion and must prove safe for one million years, leaving officials to balance urgency against the demand for consistency.

Beneath an island in western Finland, a granite-deep chamber has become the first nuclear waste repository the world has formally approved, a quiet milestone that shows how long humanity takes to answer a question it created seventy years ago. Germany, having turned its back on nuclear power, now faces the same unfinished task: its spent material will remain on its own soil, and the search for a resting place has narrowed to a twentieth of the land, with a hope of decision by 2050. The story is less about rock and engineering than about patience, trust, and the reluctance of any community to be the place where the past is put away.

Four hundred meters beneath an island in western Finland, next to one of the country's nuclear plants, the world's first approved final repository for radioactive waste has been completed after around forty years of work. Finland now stands alone. Nearly every other nation that has run nuclear power, Germany among them, is still searching for a place to put material that stays dangerous for many thousands of years.

Germany has been at this for almost a decade through the Federal Company for Radioactive Waste Disposal, BGE. This week it announced that only 5% of the country's land remains under consideration, spread across 11 of its 16 states. One decision is already fixed: the waste from decades of nuclear power will stay in Germany, most of it at the nineteen decommissioning plants and several research sites. The search proceeds by elimination, starting with geology. Candidate areas must hold stable rock at depth, keep groundwater clean, and offer a thick natural barrier of clay, granite or rock salt. Only later do questions such as proximity to cities come into play.

The target is a site by 2050, and Environment Minister Carsten Schneider wants to know whether that can be accelerated. BGE spokesperson Dagmar Dehmer urged patience. Germany must demonstrate safety for one million years, far longer than Finland's 100,000, and she believes the country can learn from Finland's high public trust in government and its respected regulator, STUK. Her advice was to stay consistent and avoid sudden changes of direction.

The cost is the quiet pressure behind it all. Storage and the search together run about €1.4 billion a year, and the finished repository, designed to hold 28,000 cubic meters, is estimated at €14 billion. For now the task is narrower but no less demanding: cut the remaining 5% further, and decide whether 2050 can be brought closer.

Four hundred meters beneath an island in western Finland, next to one of the country's two nuclear power plants, sits the first approved final repository for radioactive waste anywhere in the world. It took around 40 years to complete. Finland is now alone in having reached this point, and every other nuclear nation, Germany included, is still waiting for its own answer.

The scale of the problem is wide. Some 31 countries operate or once operated nuclear power plants, and the first large-scale plant went online in the Soviet Union in 1954. Seven decades later, the question of where the waste should finally go remains largely unresolved. Most experts have long agreed that spent fuel elements, which stay radioactive for many thousands of years, belong deep underground. Agreeing on the principle has proved far easier than finding a place for it, since hardly anyone wants to live near such a site.

Germany has been looking for almost ten years. The Federal Company for Radioactive Waste Disposal, known as BGE, was created for the task, and this week it announced that only 5% of the country's land area remains under consideration. That territory is spread across 11 of Germany's 16 states. The agency is consulting geologists, nuclear experts and physicists, as well as citizens and politicians. One thing is already settled: the waste produced during decades of nuclear power will stay in Germany.

Most of it sits where it was generated or close by, at the 19 former nuclear power plants now being decommissioned and at several research facilities. Germany decided in 2011, after the Fukushima reactor disaster in Japan, to end the commercial use of nuclear energy, and the last plant shut down in 2023. The waste, though, remains in interim storage.

The selection process works by elimination. Sites are first judged on geology: whether the rock will stay stable at 400 meters, and whether groundwater could become contaminated. The aim is a repository wrapped in a rock layer about 100 meters thick as a natural barrier, in clay, granite or rock salt. As requirements tighten, candidate sites fall away. Factors such as proximity to large cities enter only much later.

Germany hopes to name a site by 2050. Environment Minister Carsten Schneider of the center-left SPD wants to examine whether the search can be sped up. Ministry spokesperson Stephan Gabriel Haufe told a regular government press conference this week that Russia, the United States, the United Kingdom and Japan have not advanced their procedures as far as Germany has. Finland, he said, is making the fastest progress worldwide, but Germany is among the leading countries.

BGE spokesperson Dagmar Dehmer points to the length of the safety case. A repository must be shown to stay safe for 100,000 years in Finland, and for one million years in Germany, Switzerland and France. Whatever the horizon, she said, the work is enormous, requiring analysis of how geology and technology interact over time and how radionuclides decay. Part of her job is building public trust, and she believes Finland has managed it. She described high trust in government there and called the regulator, STUK, one of the country's most respected institutions. Germany, she said, can learn by staying consistent, avoiding frequent changes of direction and showing patience.

Money is part of the picture. The search and the storage of waste at former reactor sites cost around €1.4 billion ($1.6 billion) each year. Experts put the finished repository at roughly €14 billion ($16.4 billion), and if all goes to plan it will permanently hold 28,000 cubic meters of waste. For now, Germany's task is to narrow the 5% further, and to decide whether 2050 can be brought closer.

Finland is certainly the country making the fastest progress worldwide. But Germany is among the leading countries.
— Stephan Gabriel Haufe, German environment ministry spokesperson
Germany can learn from Finland by staying consistent, avoiding frequent changes in direction and showing patience.
— Dagmar Dehmer, BGE spokesperson (paraphrased)
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en Deutsche Welle ↗
Contáctanos FAQ