In a small clinical trial reported in Nature Medicine, researchers at Washington University in St. Louis tested whether a donor stem cell transplant could be altered so that a later cancer drug would spare the healthy cells it is meant to protect. Thirty adults with aggressive myeloid blood cancers, a group that has resisted many newer immunotherapies, received donor cells edited to lack a single protein, CD33. The transplants settled in the marrow about as quickly as conventional ones, and the patients' blood counts held steady through a follow-up antibody treatment that usually depletes them
Gene-Edited Stem Cell Transplants Shield Healthy Cells in Trial for Aggressive Blood Cancers
One patient reached remission; one case is not a trial
So what did this trial actually set out to show?
That donor stem cells with CD33 deleted behave like normal transplant cells. They engrafted in all 30 patients by day 28, and platelets came back around day 16 on average.
Why remove CD33 at all?
Because therapies aimed at CD33 can't tell cancer from healthy donor cells. If the donor cells lack it, the treatment should hit only the cancer.
Should should be underlined. Did the trial show better cancer control?
No. It was a phase 1/2 safety and feasibility study, with no comparison group. The signal was that blood counts held during the antibody drug, which usually lowers them.
And survival? Average just over 14 months isn't something I can judge without a comparator.
Agreed. Seven of 30 died, four from cancer progression and three from transplant-related causes. The source doesn't compare that to standard transplants beyond saying side effects looked similar.
What about the CAR-T case?
One patient. Complete remission and over a year cancer free is striking, but it can't tell us how often that happens.
Right, and it's why the researchers frame this as groundwork for paired therapies, not proof they work.
O Pulso
- Thirty patients with aggressive leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome faced high relapse risk, leaving doctors searching for ways to keep the cancer from returning after transplant.
- CAR-T immunotherapy stalls in these diseases because its targets also live on healthy blood-forming cells, threatening the very donor cells a transplant depends on.
- Donor stem cells were edited with CRISPR to remove CD33, letting follow-up CD33-targeted treatment strike cancer while sparing healthy marrow.
- Engraftment arrived by day 28 and blood counts held across every dose, yet seven patients died, four from cancer progression and three from transplant complications.
- Researchers are now aiming to pair the edited transplant with CD33-targeted CAR-T therapy, buoyed by one remission case but still awaiting larger controlled trials.
In a small clinical trial reported in Nature Medicine, researchers at Washington University in St. Louis tested whether a donor stem cell transplant could be altered so that a later cancer drug would spare the healthy cells it is meant to protect. Thirty adults with aggressive myeloid blood cancers, a group that has resisted many newer immunotherapies, received donor cells edited to lack a single protein, CD33. The transplants settled in the marrow about as quickly as conventional ones, and the patients' blood counts held steady through a follow-up antibody treatment that usually depletes them. Seven of the thirty died, a reminder that even hopeful advances in this field carry real and irreversible cost.
Thirty adults with some of the hardest-to-treat blood cancers, acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome, received a stem cell transplant with an unusual difference. Their donor cells had been edited with CRISPR to remove a protein called CD33. The phase 1/2 trial, run by researchers at Washington University in St. Louis with fourteen other sites in the United States and Canada, asked whether that single change could make later cancer treatment safer.
A transplant is often the only option with real curative potential for these cancers, yet they frequently return. Newer CAR-T immunotherapy has not worked against them, partly because the targets it seeks also live on healthy blood-forming cells, including the donor cells themselves. CD33 appears only on those blood cells and people born without it have no apparent health problems, so removing it from donor cells means a CD33-targeted drug should, in theory, hit only remaining cancer.
The patients received gemtuzumab ozogamicin, an approved antibody-drug that helps prevent relapse but usually causes dangerous drops in blood counts. Their counts held at every dose tested. All thirty engrafted by day 28, close to standard timelines, and side effects looked much like those of ordinary transplants. Still, seven patients died, four from the cancer and three from complications such as kidney failure, liver toxicity and sepsis.
The lead investigator, John DiPersio, said he was encouraged, noting outcomes very similar to standard transplantation. He hopes to combine the edited cells with CD33-targeted CAR-T therapy. A single case, published last October, offers a glimmer: a patient who relapsed after such a transplant received CD33-targeted CAR-T cells from the same donor and has stayed in remission for over a year. One case is not proof, and the next step is testing the pairing in larger studies.
Thirty adults with some of the hardest-to-treat blood cancers received a stem cell transplant with an unusual feature: the donor cells had been edited with CRISPR to remove a single protein, CD33. A clinical trial led by researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis tested whether that change could make follow-up cancer therapy safer. The results appear in Nature Medicine.
The patients had acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and were at high risk of relapse. For aggressive blood cancers, a stem cell transplant is often the only treatment with curative potential, yet the cancers frequently come back afterward. The phase 1/2 trial ran at Siteman Cancer Center, which is based at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and WashU Medicine, along with 14 other sites in the U.S. and Canada.
The problem the edit aims to solve is specific. CAR-T cell therapy, an immunotherapy that works against some aggressive blood cancers, has not worked against all of them, including AML and MDS. John F. DiPersio, MD, Ph.D., the study's corresponding author, explains that myeloid cancers are tricky because the proteins CAR-T cells home in on are also present on healthy myeloid cells, including the donor stem cells given in a transplant. The therapy can therefore destroy healthy blood stem cells, which risks toxicity and a dangerous inflammatory cascade. It may also blunt the treatment, because many CAR-T cells attack the wrong targets and leave cancer cells untouched.
The basic concept was first described by Miriam Y. Kim, MD, now an assistant professor of medicine at WashU Medicine. She began the work as a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Pennsylvania and continued it in the DiPersio lab.
CD33 is an appealing protein to delete because it appears only on blood-forming cells, not other tissues, and people born without it have no apparent health problems. If a patient receives CD33-free donor cells, any remaining cells carrying CD33 should in theory be cancer, so a CD33-targeted therapy would spare the healthy donor cells. The edited product is called tremtelectogene empogeditemcel, or trem-cel.
As a proof of concept, the patients received gemtuzumab ozogamicin after transplant. It is not a CAR-T therapy but an engineered antibody that targets CD33 and carries an anti-cancer drug. The FDA has approved it for CD33-positive AML, and it is in trials for CD33-positive MDS. It helps prevent relapse, but its use is limited by liver toxicity and damage to blood cells, including dangerously low white cell, red cell and platelet counts.
All 30 patients achieved engraftment, meaning the transplanted cells settled in the bone marrow and began working, by day 28. Platelet production returned by day 16 on average. Those timelines are comparable to standard transplants. Nineteen patients received at least one cycle of the antibody in a dose-escalation protocol, and researchers established a recommended dose. Blood counts held across all doses, suggesting the edited transplant protected patients from the low counts usually seen with this drug after a standard transplant.
Side effects resembled those of standard transplants: anemia, low platelets, fever, infections and graft-versus-host disease, in which donor cells attack the patient's healthy tissue. Average survival was just over 14 months. Seven patients died during the study, four from cancer progression and three from transplant-related causes: kidney failure, liver toxicity and sepsis.
"We are encouraged by the results," said DiPersio, who directs WashU Medicine's Center for Gene and Cellular Immunotherapy, noting that outcomes looked very similar to standard transplantation. He hopes to combine the approach with CD33-targeted immunotherapies such as CAR-T cells. A single case study published in October 2025 in JCO Precision Oncology points that way: a patient with a highly aggressive AML relapsed after a CD33-deleted transplant, then received CD33-targeted CAR-T cells made from the same donor's T cells. That patient reached complete remission and remains cancer free more than a year later, with normal blood production from cells lacking CD33. One case is not a trial; the next step is pairing the two approaches in larger studies.
Citações Notáveis
We are encouraged by the results showing that a CD33-deleted stem cell transplant looks very similar to the outcomes of standard stem cell transplantation.— John F. DiPersio, MD, Ph.D., WashU Medicine