‘Gaza’s suffering has become campaign fodder’: Palestinians fear Israel’s election will change little

Nearly 75,000 people killed in Gaza, nearly a million displaced, with food and water shortages and over 20,000 children killed since 7 October 2023.
Gaza's suffering has become campaign fodder.
Sami Abu Rumi, displaced in al-Mawasi, describes how Gaza figures in Israel's election campaign.
Mark

Why does a story about an Israeli election center on people who can't vote in it?

Mimi

Because the outcome lands on them. Gazans like Sami Abu Rumi and Haneen Hamdouna are displaced in al-Mawasi, and they see the vote as deciding whether the war resumes.

Mark

And the campaign itself barely mentions them?

Mimi

Right. Netanyahu and Eisenkot both talk about ending Hamas rule and both back Trump's plan, but neither has set out a clear plan for Gaza.

Luke

Worth noting the casualty figures. The nearly 75,000 killed and the 20,000 children are stated in the report without attribution to a source, so I'd want to know who is counting.

Mimi

Fair. The piece doesn't say. The accounts of hunger are from residents, too.

Luke

Same with the flour price. More than three times higher, and deliveries suspended about a week, are what residents say. No independent price data is given.

Mark

What about Eisenkot? Is he seen as the alternative?

Mimi

Not really. He led in the polls over Likud, but he championed the Dahiya doctrine, and critics say it has been applied in Gaza.

Luke

Critics say that. The piece doesn't establish it, and it's not a finding of war crimes.

Mark

So what do people expect?

Mimi

Little change. Hamdouna says maybe 200 trucks instead of 100, but not a real difference.

Luke

And what either man would actually do after winning is unknown. That's the gap.

  • Gaza's humanitarian collapse, from displacement to failing water and food supplies, has been nearly invisible in Israel's election campaign.
  • Netanyahu and Eisenkot both pledge to end Hamas rule and back Trump's peace plan, yet neither offers a concrete path for Gaza's future.
  • Gazans fear that a new government, whoever leads it, will bring renewed war, forced flight and tighter restrictions on aid.
  • Flour prices have tripled and commercial deliveries have stalled, leaving families bracing for a renewed hunger crisis whatever the vote delivers.

As Israel moves toward the ballot box, a question about the future is being asked in two places at once: in the Israeli cities where campaign speeches fill the airwaves, and in the tents of al-Mawasi, where a father postpones his son's wedding until the result is known. Nearly 75,000 people have been killed in Gaza and close to a million displaced, yet the suffering that shapes their days barely registers in the contest that will decide whether their war continues. It is a reminder that some of the most consequential choices in a conflict can be made in rooms where the people living its outcome have no voice.

A friend of Karim Mareesh was going to hold his son's wedding in the coming days. Instead, he has postponed it until after Israel votes, fearing that if Benjamin Netanyahu's far-right government wins another term, the war could resume and force him to flee again, with his tent and the wedding supplies he struggled to save left behind.

That small decision captures how Gaza is watching an election it cannot take part in. Nearly a million displaced Palestinians there live with failing sanitation, water shortages and the constant threat of strikes, yet the territory has barely featured in the campaign. Both Netanyahu's coalition and Gadi Eisenkot's Yashar party have focused on destroying Hamas after the 7 October attacks. Neither has set out a clear plan for Gaza's future, though both have vowed to end Hamas rule and back Donald Trump's peace plan.

Eisenkot, a former military chief whose party leads Likud in the polls, promises to restore Israel's standing abroad, but critics note his past championing of the Dahiya doctrine, which called for overwhelming force against civilian areas. Many argue that approach has shaped Gaza's destruction. His own son and two nephews were killed fighting there.

Sami Abu Rumi, displaced from Rafah to al-Mawasi, hopes for a government less inclined toward killing and displacement, but sees little difference between the leaders. "Gaza's suffering has become campaign fodder," he said. Inside Israel, the Arab-led Joint List has tried to press the point with a drone-footage video of Gaza's ruins, though its parties are unlikely to join an Eisenkot-led coalition.

In Gaza, pessimism runs deep. Haneen Hamdouna says each new Israeli government is hoped to be better and proves worse. Even a rise from 100 to 200 aid trucks would not change daily life. Most people are too consumed by the hunt for food and water to follow the race, and with commercial deliveries suspended and flour prices more than triple their earlier level, fears of renewed hunger are growing. What to watch after the vote is whether aid access changes and whether the war resumes.

A friend of Karim Mareesh's was supposed to hold his son's wedding in the coming days. He has put it off until after Israel votes. Mareesh, 43, says the man worried that if Benjamin Netanyahu's far-right government won another term, the war could resume and force him to flee again, costing him his tent and the wedding supplies he had struggled to save.

That small postponement shows how Gaza is watching an election it cannot take part in. As Israelis head to the polls, Palestinians in the territory know their fate rests with the country that has reduced much of Gaza to rubble and killed nearly 75,000 people. Nearly a million displaced Palestinians there live with dire sanitary conditions, water shortages and the constant threat of Israeli strikes. Yet Gaza has been largely absent from the campaign.

Both Netanyahu's coalition and the opposition Yashar party of Gadi Eisenkot have concentrated on destroying Hamas after the 7 October attacks and the trauma they inflicted on Israeli society. The humanitarian catastrophe across the border has received little, if any, attention. Neither man has laid out a clear plan for Gaza's future. Both have vowed to end Hamas rule, and both back Donald Trump's controversial peace plan.

Eisenkot, a former military chief whose party leads Netanyahu's Likud in the polls, has promised to restore Israel's international standing after three years of war. He is not, however, a dove. A senior commander in Israel's 2006 war with Hezbollah, he later championed the "Dahiya doctrine", which called for overwhelming force against civilian areas where militants operated. Critics say that approach has been used in Gaza, causing destruction they argue amounts to war crimes. Eisenkot's son and two nephews were killed fighting in Gaza.

Sami Abu Rumi, 47, from Rafah and now displaced in al-Mawasi, Khan Younis, said he hopes for a government less inclined toward killing and displacement, but sees Israeli governments' thinking as largely similar. "Eisenkot talks of defeating Hamas, while Netanyahu boasts about military operations and the killing of Palestinians," he said. "Gaza's suffering has become campaign fodder." Families, he said, struggle to feed their children, keep them in school and reach medical care.

Inside Israel, the Arab-led Joint List released a 48-second video this week with drone footage of Gaza's ruins. Its voiceover accuses others of behaving as if it were normal that tens of thousands were killed and entire cities turned into wastelands. The party says it "will not be silent" and that rivals "want more destruction. We offer life." Arab parties are very unlikely to join an Eisenkot-led coalition, though they could back it from outside government.

In Gaza, pessimism runs deep. Haneen Hamdouna, 45, from Beit Lahia, also displaced to al-Mawasi, said attacking Gaza seems to have become part of Israeli campaigning. Each new government is hoped to be better, she said, only to prove worse. At best, 200 aid trucks might be allowed in instead of 100, "but that would not mean any real change in our lives." Noor AlMoghanni, 20, from Gaza City, said promises about easing suffering are no longer believed, and that whether Netanyahu wins or loses, the aim as she sees it is to destroy the foundations of life in Gaza.

Most people there are too consumed by the search for food and water to follow the race. Fears of renewed hunger are growing as markets run short of fresh produce. Residents say commercial deliveries have been suspended for about a week, pushing prices up. Flour costs more than three times its earlier price, and shrinking aid leaves families exposed to another food crisis. Israeli restrictions on food and aid have turned hunger into a weapon of war, the report says, and more than 20,000 Palestinian children have been killed since 7 October 2023.

What to watch after the vote is whether aid access changes and whether the war resumes, the question that has put one wedding on hold.

Eisenkot talks of defeating Hamas, while Netanyahu boasts about military operations and the killing of Palestinians. Gaza's suffering has become campaign fodder.
— Sami Abu Rumi, 47, displaced from Rafah
Whether Netanyahu wins or loses, the reality here will not change.
— Noor AlMoghanni, 20, Gaza City
Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em The Guardian ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ