In the aftermath of a mistrial that left three young children's deaths unresolved by law, a television host's visible surprise at the race of the lone dissenting juror became its own kind of verdict — one rendered not in a courtroom, but in the court of public perception. The Lindsay Clancy case, in which eleven jurors found a mother not criminally responsible for strangling her children while one stood alone for conviction, has now opened a second trial of sorts: an examination of who we expect to judge, and why. The moment asks an old and uncomfortable question — whether our assumptions abou
Gayle King's reaction to Black juror identity in Clancy trial sparks media debate
Three young children (ages 5, 3, and 8 months) were killed by their mother Lindsay Clancy by strangulation.