From £700/month to control: How young adults are beating shopping addiction

The feeling fades and the cycle repeats
Describing the temporary relief of impulse purchases and the compulsion to buy again.
Mark

So this is about young women specifically. Why them?

Mimi

The research shows Gen Z and millennials are most susceptible, and within those groups, women are disproportionately affected. Ninety percent of the cases Ukat Group sees are women. Part of it is exposure—social media algorithms are targeting them with ads and influencer content constantly. But there's also something about how they grew up. Both Ella and Dish mentioned not having much money as kids, then suddenly having access to income and credit.

Luke

That's important to flag though. The source doesn't prove causation there. Both women had that experience, but we don't have data saying that's the common thread across all shopping addiction cases. It's their personal story, not necessarily the pattern.

Mark

Fair. So what actually changed for them? How did they break it?

Mimi

Friction. They made spending harder. Ella used a 30-day wait list—most of the time the urge just disappeared. Dish deleted the apps, left her cards at home, pre-planned her spending. Both of them cut their spending dramatically.

Luke

And both of them are now in positions where they're talking about this publicly—Ella's an ethical fashion influencer, Dish is a financial planner. That's worth noting. They're not just recovered; they're now positioned as voices on the issue. That doesn't invalidate their experience, but it's part of the context.

Mark

What about the people who can't do this on their own?

Mimi

The source mentions that Ukat Group runs treatment centers. There's also advice from Citizens Advice, Stepchange, Christians Against Poverty, and National Debtline. But the article doesn't really explore what professional treatment looks like or how effective it is.

Luke

Right. We get tips and we get two success stories, but we don't get a sense of how many people try these strategies and fail, or what the actual treatment landscape looks like. The 7% figure—that's global, and it's one study. We don't know how stable that number is or how it's measured.

Mark

So the real question is whether this is a design problem or a personal problem?

Mimi

The article suggests it's both. The platforms are engineered to encourage spending—one-click checkout, Buy Now Pay Later, targeted ads. But individuals can also build their own barriers. The friction approach works for some people.

Luke

But we don't know how many people it works for, or whether it works long-term. We're looking at two case studies over what timeframe? The article doesn't say. And we don't hear from anyone who tried these strategies and it didn't stick.

  • Young women are spending hundreds of pounds monthly on items they never use, trapped in a dopamine loop that social media platforms and one-click checkout systems are deliberately designed to sustain.
  • The damage runs deeper than debt — compulsive shoppers lie to loved ones, fill homes with unworn clothes, and find themselves unable to afford basic independence like moving out or building savings.
  • Gen Z makes more impulse purchases than any generation in history, and treatment centers report that 90% of shopping addiction cases are women, signaling a crisis shaped as much by design as by personal vulnerability.
  • Two young women reduced their compulsive spending by roughly 60% not through willpower alone, but by engineering their own friction — 30-day wait lists, deleted apps, imaginary budgets, and savings rules that made every purchase cost twice.
  • The clearest finding from both lived experience and expert analysis is the same: when the path from craving to checkout requires effort, the compulsion loses its grip.

In an era engineered for effortless consumption, a growing number of young women find themselves caught in a cycle of compulsive spending — not from greed, but from the quiet architecture of algorithms, loneliness, and the ancient human ache to fill what feels empty. Roughly one in fourteen adults struggles with shopping addiction, and the youngest generation faces the sharpest edge of this condition, shaped by platforms designed to dissolve the distance between desire and transaction. Yet the stories emerging from this struggle carry something hopeful: that small, deliberate acts of friction — a waiting list, a deleted app, a card left at home — can restore the pause that compulsion steals.

For most people, a late-night impulse buy is a passing lapse. For a growing number of young adults, it is the rhythm of daily life. Around 7% of adults are thought to struggle with shopping addiction — an inability to stop spending despite knowing the harm it causes — and younger women are most at risk.

Ella Hewitt, 24, from Liverpool, was spending up to £700 a month on fast fashion she rarely wore. Having grown up without much money, her first paycheck as an HR assistant seemed to vanish as quickly as it arrived, funneled into TikTok and Instagram trends she bought late at night when boredom or tiredness made resistance impossible. The spending kept her trapped in her family home, unable to save. So she built barriers. A 30-day wish list meant most urges dissolved before she acted on them. An imaginary budget of £1,000 a day let her satisfy the itch without real cost. A rule that she could only buy something she could afford three times over slowed her down further. Her spending fell by about 60%. She now works as an ethical fashion influencer and is preparing to launch her own clothing brand.

Dish Patel, 23, from London, maxed out a £2,500 overdraft as a student buying clothes, food, and skincare — always broke, always chasing a relief that faded with each delivery. She recognized that her real addiction was the apps themselves. She deleted them, removed ApplePay, left her bank cards at home, and pre-planned her days to eliminate unplanned spending. Then she added a rule: any purchase required putting the same amount into savings. She didn't want to spend the money twice. It worked. She now works as a financial planner.

The conditions that produce these patterns are not accidental. Social media algorithms target relentlessly, influencer culture normalizes constant consumption, and checkout systems are engineered to remove every moment of hesitation. Buy Now Pay Later schemes make spending feel consequence-free. Charities working at the intersection of money and mental health argue that these platforms are deliberately designed to minimize psychological resistance. Treatment centers report a rising tide of cases, with 90% of patients being women.

The interventions that work share a common logic: they restore friction. Waiting periods let urgency fade. Deleting apps and saved payment details adds steps between craving and action. Knowing your triggers — loneliness, boredom, stress — and choosing something else instead breaks the automatic loop. The evidence from both research and lived experience points to the same conclusion: when desire requires effort to act on, the compulsion loses much of its power.

It happens to most of us at some point: midnight scrolling, a sudden urge, a purchase made before sleep. The regret comes in the morning. But for a growing number of young adults, that cycle doesn't stop after one transaction. It becomes the rhythm of their life.

Research suggests roughly 7% of adults struggle with what clinicians call shopping addiction—an inability to resist spending despite knowing the financial damage it will cause. Younger women face the highest risk. The pattern is recognizable: the dopamine rush of acquisition, the brief satisfaction, then the crash into guilt and shame. For Ella Hewitt, a 24-year-old from Liverpool, the cycle spiraled into crisis. In 2021, she was spending up to £700 each month on fast fashion she often never wore. She had grown up without much money, and when she landed her first job as an HR assistant at a school, the wages hit her account and vanished just as quickly. Social media made it worse. TikTok and Instagram feeds served her an endless stream of trends, and she bought them all—usually late at night when she was tired or bored, chasing the feeling that never quite lasted.

The spending trapped her. She couldn't afford to move out of her family home. Horrified at what she was doing, she began experimenting with barriers between impulse and action. She created a wish list and forced herself to wait 30 days before buying anything on it. Most of the time, the urge evaporated. She invented an imaginary budget of £1,000 a day to spend on imaginary purchases, which satisfied the itch without the cost. She made a rule: she could only buy something if she could afford to buy it three times over. The results were concrete. She cut her spending by about 60%. She still buys things she wants, but the compulsion has loosened. She now works as an ethical fashion influencer and is planning to launch her own clothing brand.

Dish Patel, 23, from London, followed a similar arc. As a student, she maxed out a £2,500 overdraft buying clothes, food, makeup, and skincare. She was always broke. Like Ella, she was compensating for childhood scarcity, but the relief was temporary. Each parcel brought a rush that faded quickly, then the cycle restarted. She bought anything trending, but her real addiction was the apps themselves—scrolling through Asos and Pretty Little Thing to pass time. She deleted the apps from her phone. She removed ApplePay. She started leaving her bank cards at home when she went to work, buying her train ticket the night before and bringing a packed lunch. She pre-planned every day to eliminate spending opportunities. Then she added a rule: any time she wanted to buy something, she had to put the same amount into savings or investments. "I didn't want to spend the money twice," she says. It worked. She now works as a financial planner.

The vulnerability is real and measurable. Gen Z shoppers make more impulse purchases than any other age group, closely followed by millennials. Experts point to the infrastructure of modern retail: social media algorithms that target relentlessly, influencer culture that normalizes consumption, and checkout systems designed to remove friction. One click and the transaction is done. Buy Now Pay Later schemes make spending feel consequence-free. Money and Mental Health, a charity focused on the intersection of finances and wellbeing, argues that online shopping sites are deliberately engineered to minimize the psychological resistance to spending—pop-ups that pressure, designs that streamline, payment methods that defer the pain of payment.

The Ukat Group, which operates addiction treatment centers across the country, reports a rising tide of shopping addiction cases, with 90% of them women. The signs are consistent: mood lifts immediately after a purchase, then guilt and shame follow. People lie to loved ones about what they've bought. Their homes fill with unworn items. The interventions that work are surprisingly simple: waiting periods that let the urge fade, deleting apps and saved payment methods, writing shopping lists and sticking to them, unfollowing influencers, leaving cards at home. Setting a small guilt-free budget or an imaginary one. Knowing your triggers—loneliness, boredom, stress—and choosing something else instead. The pattern is clear: friction works. When spending requires effort, fewer impulse purchases happen. When the barrier between desire and action is removed, the vulnerable buy.

The dopamine hit kept me shopping and in the world of social media there is just so much encouragement to do that.
— Ella Hewitt, 24, on why her spending spiraled
I didn't want to spend the money twice.
— Dish Patel, 23, on her strategy of matching purchases with savings contributions
Vuoi la storia completa? Leggi l'originale su BBC News ↗
Contattaci Domande frequenti