Fremantle's Walyalup Bridge Opens Early to Crowds, Despite a $596 Million Cost Blowout

More than double the original estimate
The Walyalup Bridge cost $596 million, though it opened about four months ahead of schedule.
Mark

Why does a bridge opening draw this much attention?

Mimi

Because Fremantle lost a crossing for months. People like Gladys Arundel, who attended the 1939 opening, have a lifetime attached to it.

Mark

The cost is the headline, though. $596 million.

Mimi

More than double the original estimate. The minister blames mainly a redesign that avoided reconfiguring all the roads, which she says would have disrupted traffic for years.

Luke

That's her explanation, and it's the only one in the reporting. We don't have an independent breakdown of where the extra money went.

Mark

And the early finish? About four months ahead of a 12-month schedule.

Mimi

That's a genuine achievement, and the traffic chaos people feared didn't materialise either.

Luke

Congestion was reported as less bad than feared, but there are no figures here. Businesses are mixed too: some closed, some lost customers, some were fine.

Mark

What about the cyclists' objection?

Mimi

They say there's no grade-separated crossing at Queen Victoria Street on the north end, and they call it unsafe.

Luke

That's an advocacy group's assessment. The government's response to it isn't in this reporting, so it remains unresolved.

  • The old bridge closed in February and was dismantled while its replacement was built alongside, leaving the city's single river link in the balance.
  • At $596 million, the cost has more than doubled, and the minister points to a redesign that spared the district years of road chaos.
  • Fears that Stirling Bridge would choke under the extra load prompted new signals, extra trains and buses, free parking bays, and tighter CCTV watch.
  • Congestion proved milder than predicted, though some local businesses have closed while others say the damage was less than they feared.
  • Cyclists' advocates call the design the most unsafe near Perth in decades and demand a grade-separated crossing at Queen Victoria Street, putting the government under pressure to act.

On a crossing where the river has carried people and goods since convicts first laid its timbers in the mid-1800s, Fremantle has opened its fifth bridge, the Walyalup, earlier than promised and far more expensively than first imagined. The old span, heritage-listed and eighty-six years old, was taken apart piece by piece while its replacement rose around it, a reminder that cities rebuild their connections without ever fully letting go of the past. The price of $596 million, more than double the first estimate, reflects a judgment that a faster, gentler route through the disruption was worth the cost. Yet the questions of who is kept safe on that new crossing, and whether the design serves the people who walk and ride it, remain open as the city begins to live with what it has built.

Gladys Arundel stood among the first to walk onto the new Fremantle bridge, eighty-seven years after she had been marched down the road as a fourteen-year-old schoolgirl to see its predecessor open in 1939. Her memory of that day, full of excitement, sat alongside a crowd of as many as 15,000 expected to cross the Walyalup Bridge on its opening, months ahead of schedule.

The new 500-metre crossing over the Swan River is Australia's first extra-dosed bridge, with the same number of traffic lanes as before, wider footpaths, and more room for boats. The old bridge, heritage-listed and eighty-six years old, was closed in February and dismantled around the emerging replacement. Some timber, including decking, was kept, and some pylons became artwork, a nod to a crossing that dates back to convict labour.

The cost has been the hard part. At $596 million, the bridge more than doubled its original estimate. Transport Minister Rita Saffioti blamed the redesign, which avoided a reconfiguration of surrounding roads that would have snarled traffic for years.

When the bridge closed, the city braced for chaos on Stirling Bridge. Extra trains and buses, adjusted signals, free parking for SmartRider users, and more CCTV helped keep movement flowing. Businesses on both banks had feared ruin; some have closed, others have lost customers, and some found the impact less grim than expected.

Not everyone is satisfied. The Cyclists' Action Group calls the design dangerously unsafe for walkers, cyclists, and parents with prams, pressing for a safe crossing under the north end at Queen Victoria Street. How the government answers that call will shape how the bridge is remembered.

Gladys Arundel was among the first people to walk onto the new Fremantle traffic bridge, 87 years after she attended the opening of its predecessor. She was fourteen in 1939, a high school student whose class was sent down the road on foot for the ceremony. "It was very exciting," she recalled of that day. Up to 15,000 people were expected to cross the replacement, the Walyalup Bridge, on its opening day, months earlier than planned.

The new crossing is 500 metres long and spans the Swan River at the port city. It is the first "extra-dosed" bridge built in Australia, a design that combines cantilevers with cable stay supports. It has the same number of traffic lanes as the old bridge, but wider pedestrian paths and higher clearance for boats.

The old bridge was 86 years old and heritage-listed. It was closed in February and progressively dismantled while the new structure was built around it. Construction was expected to take 12 months and finished about four months ahead of that. Jan Middleton was also in the crowd. Seventy years ago she survived a 10-metre plunge off the old bridge in her car.

The cost is the harder part of the story. The bridge came in at $596 million, more than double the original estimate. Transport Minister Rita Saffioti attributed the blowout primarily to the redesign. She said the version before the final one involved a complete reconfiguration of the surrounding roads, which would have disrupted traffic for years. The government instead settled on a method that, in her words, disrupted the community the least. She thanked everyone involved, along with residents and local businesses, for their patience.

The Walyalup Bridge is the fifth iteration of the crossing. Convicts built the first in the mid-1800s. The 1939 bridge, the most recent one replaced, was designed to last 40 years. Saffioti said much thought went into preserving that history: some timber, including decking, has been kept, and some of the pylons have been built into artwork.

When the bridge closed, there were serious fears that traffic would clog the one remaining river crossing, the Stirling Bridge. The government adjusted traffic signals and turning lanes and added other measures. It also put on extra train and bus services, created more free parking bays for SmartRider users, and increased CCTV monitoring of traffic. Congestion proved less severe than feared. "We managed to move people throughout this area with some delays but not anywhere near what people were expecting," Saffioti said.

Businesses on both sides of the river had warned of potentially severe economic damage. The outcome was mixed: some have since closed, others reported fewer customers, and others said the closure was not as bad as they had feared.

Not everyone is pleased with the result. The Cyclists' Action Group has condemned the design as "the most unsafe design for pedestrians, cyclists and mothers with prams built over the rivers near Perth since at least 1980." Its central complaint is the lack of a grade-separated crossing under the bridge's north end, which would let vulnerable road users cross Queen Victoria Street safely. Whether the government responds to that criticism is the question to watch now that the bridge is open.

We came up with a method that disrupted the community the least, that delivered the best outcome.
— Transport Minister Rita Saffioti
The most unsafe design for pedestrians, cyclists and mothers with prams built over the rivers near Perth since at least 1980.
— Cyclists' Action Group
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur EUROPE SAYS ↗
Nous contacter FAQ