Former FBI Director James Comey Faces Federal Leak Charges, His Third Criminal Case

The administration's third attempt to prosecute Comey
Trump has repeatedly called for Comey's prosecution since firing him, and these leak charges are the latest effort.
Mark

Why does the type of charging document matter here?

Mimi

Because a criminal information skips the grand jury. A prosecutor files it directly, so no group of citizens reviewed whether the evidence was strong enough first.

Mark

And the first case did go through a grand jury.

Mimi

Yes, the September 2025 indictment for lying to Congress and obstruction. It was dismissed in November.

Luke

Careful, though. We know very little about the actual counts. The filing is three pages and gives few details.

Mark

So what do we really know about the alleged leak?

Mimi

Mostly what Comey's lawyers say in their own papers: an alleged disclosure of classified information to the New York Times in October 2016.

Luke

Right, that's the defence's description. The prosecutors' filing doesn't spell it out in what we've been given.

Mark

What about the claim that earlier teams declined to charge?

Mimi

Patrick Fitzgerald says two prosecutor teams investigated and both decided against charges.

Luke

That's his account as Comey's lawyer. It's not independently confirmed here. Same with Glenn Kirschner's view that the 10-year limit may have passed. It's an opinion from a former prosecutor, and the court hasn't ruled.

Mark

And the timing with Maurene Comey's ruling?

Mimi

It's a coincidence of dates on the same day, nothing more is established.

Luke

Agreed. The ruling on her firing is a fact. Any link between the two events isn't something the reporting shows.

  • A three-page filing has dropped two new counts on a former FBI director, reopening a decade-old leak allegation that had reportedly been shelved twice before.
  • Comey, speaking from a Substack video, mocks the case as an appalling abuse and insists he remains innocent and unafraid.
  • His defence has moved swiftly to dismiss, arguing the government has already decided no charges belong here and that the 10-year statute of limitations may have run out.
  • The case lands in the middle of a wider storm: a separate threat prosecution over a seashell post is still grinding forward, and his daughter's reinstatement ruling landed the same day.

A three-page filing has placed James Comey, once the man who led the FBI and later a sharp critic of the president who dismissed him, before a federal court for a third time. The charges concern an alleged leak of classified information to a newspaper a decade ago, a matter that two earlier teams of prosecutors reportedly chose not to pursue. Comey calls the move an abuse of the justice system and has asked a judge to throw it out, and the outcome will test how far a long and bitter feud can travel through the courts before the law answers it.

A short court filing made public this week shows federal prosecutors moving to charge James Comey, the former FBI director, with leaking national defence information. It is the third time the Justice Department has come after him, and Comey has been a vocal critic of President Donald Trump since Trump fired him during his first term.

According to Comey's lawyers, the allegation concerns the disclosure of classified material to the New York Times in October 2016, while Comey was running the FBI. The charges were filed in Washington as a criminal information, a document a prosecutor files directly, bypassing the grand jury that would normally have to approve an indictment. His lawyer, Patrick Fitzgerald, says two separate prosecution teams examined the same matter during Trump's first administration and both decided no one should be charged. The defence has already filed a motion to dismiss, and former prosecutor Glenn Kirschner has said the statute of limitations may have expired, giving that motion a strong chance.

Comey responded in a video, saying the situation would be almost funny if it were not an appalling abuse of the Justice Department. He said he is still innocent, still unafraid, and still believes in an independent judiciary.

The new charges came the same day a federal judge ruled that Comey's daughter, Maurene, was unlawfully fired from her job as a federal prosecutor and must be reinstated with back pay. Comey's earlier case, which accused him of lying to Congress, was dismissed in November. A separate prosecution over a social media image that prosecutors say threatened Trump's life remains open. Attention now turns to whether the judge accepts the statute of limitations argument, and to how the threat case proceeds.

A three-page court filing made public this week shows that federal prosecutors have taken steps to charge James Comey, the former FBI director, with leaking national defence information. It is the third time the Justice Department has moved to bring criminal charges against him. Comey has long been a critic of President Donald Trump.

The filing says little about the two counts. Comey's lawyers, in separate court papers, say the case stems from an alleged disclosure of classified information to the New York Times in October 2016, while he was running the FBI. The charges were brought in Washington DC by way of a criminal information, a written charging document filed directly by a prosecutor. That differs from an indictment, which must be approved by a grand jury, a group of citizens sworn in to decide whether the evidence is strong enough to prosecute.

Comey answered on Monday in a video posted on Substack. He said it would almost be funny if it were not such an appalling abuse of the Department of Justice, one that people cannot become numb to. He added that nothing had changed: he is still innocent, still not afraid of these people, and still believes in the independent federal judiciary.

His lawyer, Patrick Fitzgerald, said two different teams of prosecutors had looked into the alleged disclosure to the Times a decade ago, during Trump's first administration. According to Fitzgerald, both times the government decided no charges should be brought against anyone. He said the filing purports to charge Comey with crimes he did not commit. The defence has already filed a motion to dismiss.

Former federal prosecutor Glenn Kirschner told the BBC the case may have run past the 10-year statute of limitations, which in his view gives the motion to dismiss a very good chance of being granted. He also described the charges as a revenge-fuelled attempt by Trump to have his Justice Department find something that might stick.

The background is a long-running feud. Trump fired Comey during his first term, after the FBI director opened an investigation into claims of Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election. Trump has since repeatedly called for Comey's prosecution, and these charges are the administration's third attempt.

The first came in September 2025, when a federal grand jury indicted Comey on charges that he lied to Congress in testimony and obstructed a congressional proceeding. He pleaded not guilty the following month, and the case was dismissed in November. In April 2026 he surrendered to authorities to face a second set of charges, alleging that an image he briefly shared on social media threatened Trump's life. The image was a 2025 Instagram photo of seashells on a beach arranged to read "86 47." Eighty-six is slang for "get rid of," and prosecutors allege the post encourages violence against Trump, the 47th president. Comey says he did not know what the numbers meant and accuses prosecutors of political motivation. That case is still ongoing.

The newest charges became public the same day a federal judge ruled that the Justice Department illegally fired Comey's daughter, Maurene Comey. She lost her job as a federal prosecutor in New York in July 2025 and sued, arguing she was fired because of her father and her perceived political affiliations. The judge ruled on Monday that the administration must reinstate her and give her back pay.

What to watch now is the ruling on the motion to dismiss, particularly the statute of limitations question, and the progress of the separate "86 47" case.

Nothing's changed with me - I'm still innocent, I'm still not afraid of these people and I still believe in the independent federal judiciary.
— James Comey, in a Substack video
Both times the Government determined that no charges should be brought against anyone.
— Patrick Fitzgerald, Comey's lawyer
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei BBC News ↗
Kontakt FAQ