Former BBC Correspondent's Five-Point List Urges King Charles to Apologise for Slave Trade Links

One out of five is a start.
Peter Hunt's reply to critics of his five-point list for the new king.
Mark

So what actually happened here? Somebody tweeted a list?

Mimi

Yes. Peter Hunt, a former BBC correspondent, posted five lines on what a bold start to King Charles's reign could look like. Apologise for the family's role in the slave trade, pay inheritance tax, restore Harry's honorary military appointments, bring Harry and Meghan back in, and buy a good pen.

Mark

The pen seems like a joke next to the rest.

Mimi

It reads as a wry closer, and one reply agreed the pen was a good idea. The tone was light even though the first four points are weighty.

Luke

Before we go further, how much weight can this carry? It's one person's post.

Mimi

Very little as policy. It's commentary. There's no palace response in the reporting.

Luke

Right, so nobody should read it as a sign of what Charles will do.

Mark

What about the pushback on the slave trade line?

Mimi

One reader said the family wasn't involved, its ancestors were, and called an apology unlikely. That's one reader's view, not an established ruling on the history.

Luke

And I'd note we don't know how many replies there were or how they split. The article quotes only a few.

Mark

And Hunt's last word?

Mimi

One out of five is a start. He didn't say which one.

  • A former BBC correspondent's five-point social media list has landed in the opening days of King Charles III's reign, demanding apologies, tax payments, and reconciliation.
  • The slave trade apology and the royal finances are the sharpest demands, pressing on wounds the family has never fully closed.
  • Replies split quickly: one defender argues the family itself was not involved, while another rejects the whole list outright.
  • The palace has issued no response, so the demands remain personal opinion, with the real question of whether any will be answered still open.

In the first days of a new reign, a former BBC correspondent named Peter Hunt offered a short public list of what King Charles III ought to do, placing before the new monarch questions that have long hung over his family. The five points, shared on social media, touched the family's historical ties to the slave trade, its tax obligations, and its estrangement from Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. Such advice is a familiar ritual when power changes hands, and it reveals more about the questions a society is carrying than about any decision yet made. No palace response has followed, so the list stands as one voice among many in a long conversation about inheritance, memory, and kinship.

Only days into his reign, Peter Hunt, a former BBC correspondent, posted what he called a manifesto for King Charles III. It was five lines long. He asked the king to apologise for his family's role in the slave trade, to pay inheritance tax, to restore Prince Harry's honorary military appointments, and to bring Harry and Meghan back into the fold. The fifth line was simply to buy a good pen.

Charles, now 73, has moved from heir to monarch after a long wait, and the list was offered as advice for a smooth transition. It touched some of the most delicate matters around the household: its historical links to slavery, its finances, and its rift with the Sussexes.

Replies came quickly. One royal admirer insisted the family was not itself involved in the slave trade, though its ancestors were, and doubted an apology would come. Another rejected everything but agreed the pen was a fine idea. Hunt replied that one in five was a start, without saying which he meant.

The post is one commentator's opinion on a personal account. It signals nothing from the palace, which has offered no response. What it does reveal is the questions already gathering around the new king: how he will face the history of slavery, how he will handle royal taxation, and whether the estrangement with Harry and Meghan can be repaired. Whether the palace answers any of them is what remains to be seen.

Days into a new reign, a short post on Twitter set out what one prominent royal watcher thinks the new king should do first. Peter Hunt, a former BBC correspondent, wrote what he called a manifesto for a bold start to the reign of King Charles III. It ran to five lines.

The first was that the king should apologise for his family's role in the slave trade. The second was that he should pay inheritance tax. The third was that he should give Prince Harry back his honorary military appointments. The fourth was that he should bring Harry and Meghan in from the cold. The fifth was the shortest: buy a good pen.

Charles is 73 and has just moved from heir to monarch after a long wait. The list was framed as advice for a smooth transition, and it touches several of the most sensitive questions around the royal household: the family's historical ties to slavery, its finances, and the rift with Harry and Meghan Markle.

The post drew replies. One admirer of the king pushed back on the first demand, arguing that the family itself was not involved in the slave trade, though its ancestors were, and concluded that an apology was unlikely. Another reader rejected the list wholesale, answering with a flat double no, but conceded that the pen was a good idea.

Hunt answered with a line of his own: one out of five is a start. He did not say which of the five he was counting, and the exchange stayed light in tone even as the subjects it touched are serious.

It is worth being clear about what this is. The list is one commentator's opinion, posted on a personal account. It does not reflect any announcement or signal from the palace, and the reporting records no official response to it. The demands should be read as commentary on what the new reign might address, not as a forecast of what it will do.

What the post does show is the set of questions already being attached to the new king in his first days: whether he will address the slave trade history, how he will handle the question of royal taxation, and whether the breach with Harry and Meghan can be mended. Whether the palace answers any of them is the thing to watch.

One out of five is a start.
— Peter Hunt, former BBC correspondent
His family weren't involved with the slave trade, his ancestors were. Unlikely.
— A reader replying to Hunt on Twitter
Fale Conosco FAQ