Flydubai co-pilot planned July attack on Israeli flight, investigators reveal

Over 180 passengers and crew aboard flight faced direct threat; captain sustained injuries from axe attack; incident occurred one week before anniversary of October 7 Hamas attack.
This pilot was telling the world who he was in his posts.
A security analyst describes the violent rhetoric al-Hammami posted online before the attack.
Mark

So the captain was actually able to fight back and survive the attack. How did that change what happened next?

Mimi

He was badly injured, but he managed to unlock the cockpit door despite the injuries. That's what allowed the passengers to get in and overpower al-Hammami. Without that, the outcome could have been catastrophic.

Luke

But we should be clear—we don't know exactly how many times he was struck or the full extent of the injuries. The reporting tells us he felt blows and that he was hurt enough that it mattered he survived, but the medical details aren't public.

Mark

The investigators think he planned this for July originally but postponed it. Why would he do that?

Mimi

They believe it was because a friend was among the crew that month. So he delayed the attack until he could do it without killing someone he knew.

Luke

That's what investigators believe, but it's worth noting that's an inference based on interrogation statements. We don't have independent confirmation of his reasoning.

Mark

What strikes me is that his social media was apparently full of violent rhetoric. How did that not get flagged?

Mimi

That's the core failure. An analysis found thousands of posts with misogynistic slurs, homophobic language, and explicit threats of violence. He was essentially broadcasting his extremism online.

Luke

The analysis was done after the fact by a private firm using archived posts. The question is whether anyone at flydubai, or any aviation authority, had access to that information or the tools to detect it before he was hired. We don't know what vetting actually looked like in real time.

Mark

So there's a gap between what we can see now and what was visible then.

Mimi

Exactly. And that gap is what's fueling the political backlash in Israel. People are asking how someone with a documented history of extremist concerns at his previous airline could be hired by another airline without that information being shared.

Luke

Though it's also worth noting that we don't have full clarity on what information flydubai actually requested or what Oman Air disclosed. The reporting says flydubai didn't check for radicalization, but we don't know if they asked and were refused, or simply didn't ask.

Mark

The investigation is now in eight countries. What are they actually looking for at this point?

Mimi

Whether he acted alone, when his radicalization began, and whether there were any missed opportunities to stop him before he got on that plane.

Luke

And that last part is the hardest to answer, because it requires knowing what information existed and where, and whether anyone had a responsibility to connect the dots.

  • A co-pilot rose to pray mid-flight and returned to the cockpit with an axe — what followed was not chaos but the execution of a plan investigators believe had been forming for months.
  • Despite repeated blows to the head, the captain unlocked the cockpit door, allowing passengers to overpower the attacker and a reserve pilot to divert the plane to Saudi Arabia — survival measured in seconds and instinct.
  • Al-Hammami had already been sidelined by Oman Air over extremist concerns, abandoned a position at Royal Air Maroc, and was then hired by flydubai — a hiring process that checked for criminal records but not for signs of radicalization.
  • Nearly 3,000 recovered social media posts revealed explicit violent rhetoric and conditional threats, prompting one analyst to observe that the attacker had been broadcasting who he was — and no one in a position of authority was listening.
  • A blame dispute between Israel's transportation ministry and its domestic security agency over who was responsible for vetting foreign flight crews has turned the incident into a political crisis, arriving one week before the anniversary of October 7.
  • With the investigation now spanning eight countries, the central question is no longer only what happened at 30,000 feet — but how a man with a documented trail of extremist concern was ever placed in that cockpit.

In the skies between Dubai and Tel Aviv, a co-pilot's premeditated act of violence forced a reckoning with the quiet failures that allow radicalization to move unseen through institutions built on trust. Hamam al-Hammami, a 29-year-old Omani national, attacked the captain of a flydubai flight carrying more than 180 mostly Israeli passengers with an emergency axe — an act investigators now believe was months in the making, possibly conceived as a mission rather than a moment of rage. The captain's survival, and the passengers who rushed to his aid, prevented catastrophe; but the investigation now unfolding across eight countries asks a harder question: how many systems of oversight looked directly at this man and chose not to see.

On a Wednesday afternoon, a flydubai flight carrying more than 180 passengers — nearly all Israeli — departed Dubai for Tel Aviv. Two hours and twenty minutes into the flight, co-pilot Hamam al-Hammami, a 29-year-old Omani national, left his seat to pray. When he returned, he attacked the captain with the cockpit's emergency crash axe.

Captain Smit Machchhar described feeling a sudden, heavy blow to the back of his head — then more blows, until he understood the threat was not mechanical but human. Injured and under assault, he managed to unlock the cockpit door. Passengers rushed in, overpowered al-Hammami, and a reserve pilot traveling aboard took control of the aircraft, diverting it to a regional airport in northwestern Saudi Arabia. Al-Hammami was detained by Saudi authorities.

What investigators have since uncovered reframes the attack as premeditated rather than impulsive. Al-Hammami had originally planned to act in July but postponed — possibly because a friend was among the crew that day. Evidence suggests he may have sought employment with an airline flying to Israel specifically to carry out such an attack, with interrogation reports indicating he intended to crash the plane into Ben Gurion airport or another high-profile target near Tel Aviv.

His employment history traced a path of missed warnings. Oman Air moved him to a desk role in mid-2025 after concerns about his extremist views. He briefly joined Royal Air Maroc but never flew and left the position. Flydubai then hired him, conducting background checks for criminal records but not for radicalization. Hours after the attack, posts appeared on a social media account in his name praising al-Qaeda-linked figures. A forensic analysis of his deleted account recovered nearly 3,000 posts containing misogynistic language, homophobic slurs, and what researchers called explicit conditional threats of physical violence. "This pilot was telling the world who he was," said the analyst who led the review. "Had anyone in charge been listening, nearly 200 people might never have been put in danger."

The incident has exposed a contested gap in Israeli security oversight. A dispute has emerged between the transportation ministry and the Shin Bet over who bore responsibility for vetting crew on foreign flights — a question made more urgent by reports that a key database of foreign pilots went unchecked despite prior official warnings. Coming one week before the anniversary of the October 7 Hamas attack, and weeks before a general election, the failure has become a political flashpoint, with opposition figures arguing it reflects a broader collapse in the systems meant to keep Israelis safe.

The investigation now spans at least eight countries, including New Zealand and Australia, where al-Hammami studied roughly a decade ago. Whether he acted alone, and when his radicalization took hold, remain open questions — as does the larger one: how a man with documented extremist concerns and a public record of violent rhetoric came to sit in the cockpit of a flight carrying nearly 200 people.

On a Wednesday afternoon, a flydubai flight carrying more than 180 passengers—nearly all of them Israeli—lifted off from Dubai bound for Tel Aviv. Two hours and twenty minutes into the flight, the co-pilot, a 29-year-old Omani national named Hamam al-Hammami, rose from his seat to pray. When he returned to the cockpit, he attacked the captain with an emergency crash axe kept there for safety purposes.

Captain Smit Machchhar felt what he later described as a "big blow" to the back of his head. The strikes continued. In a phone call with Israel's prime minister the following day, Machchhar recounted the moment of realization: "The blows kept coming. That's when I realised that it's not the aircraft, it's the other guy who was in the cockpit with me." Despite his injuries, Machchhar managed to unlock the cockpit door, allowing passengers to rush in and overpower al-Hammami. A reserve pilot traveling as a passenger took control of the aircraft and diverted it to a regional airport in northwestern Saudi Arabia, where al-Hammami was detained by Saudi authorities.

What investigators have uncovered since suggests this attack was not a sudden act of rage but the culmination of months of planning. Police and security agencies across at least six countries are now working to reconstruct al-Hammami's background and intentions. According to regional and Israeli officials, al-Hammami originally planned to carry out his attack in July but postponed it—possibly, investigators believe, because a friend was among the crew on that earlier date. The postponement points to something more deliberate still: evidence suggests al-Hammami may have specifically sought employment with an airline that flew to Israel in order to execute this attack.

Al-Hammami's employment history reveals a pattern of concern. He worked for Oman Air from 2018 until June 2025, when he was moved to a desk job after the airline became worried about his extremist views. He then took a position with Royal Air Maroc, Morocco's national carrier, but never obtained permission to fly and abandoned the job. Shortly after, he was hired by flydubai, a state-owned airline expanding its pilot workforce. The airline conducted background checks for criminal records but not for signs of radicalization, officials confirmed.

According to Israeli media reports of al-Hammami's statements to interrogators, he planned to crash the plane into Ben Gurion airport near Tel Aviv or possibly another high-profile target in the area. Nine hours after the attack, posts appeared on a social media account in his name praising Ayman al-Zawahiri, a former al-Qaeda leader, and a militant responsible for a lethal suicide bombing against U.S. troops in Afghanistan in 2009. An analysis of al-Hammami's deleted X account, recovered through internet archives and reviewed by the firm Accountability!, found nearly 3,000 posts and responses containing dozens of misogynistic messages, repeated use of slurs against women, and homophobic language. The analysis surfaced what researchers described as "explicit conditional threats of physical violence," including repeated imagery of violence against women. "Online toxicity isn't just corrosive, it's a warning sign," said Gur Megiddo, the firm's chief executive. "This pilot was telling the world who he was in his posts. Had anyone in charge been listening, nearly 200 people might never have been put in danger."

The incident has exposed what Israeli officials now acknowledge are significant gaps in security oversight. Israeli newspapers reported that a key database of foreign pilots had not been checked despite prior warnings from official reports. A dispute has emerged between Israel's transportation ministry and the Shin Bet, the country's domestic security agency, over who was responsible for vetting passenger lists from foreign flights. Transportation Minister Miri Regev claimed security agencies handled flight security; the Shin Bet said the transportation ministry was responsible for passenger vetting.

The timing of the attack—one week before the anniversary of the October 7 Hamas assault that triggered the war in Gaza, and weeks before a contested general election—has made it a flashpoint in Israeli politics. Opposition politicians have seized on the apparent security failures to challenge Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has made his ability to keep Israelis safe a cornerstone of his political brand. "This is exactly what system collapse looks like," wrote Yair Golan, head of the opposition Democrats party. "A transportation minister who completely abandons our skies, and a prime minister who abandons national security."

Investigators are still working to establish whether al-Hammami acted entirely alone and when his radicalization began. The investigation has expanded to at least eight countries, including New Zealand and Australia, where al-Hammami studied about a decade ago. The question of how a man with documented extremist concerns and a trail of violent rhetoric on social media was able to gain employment as a pilot at a major airline—and board a flight full of Israeli passengers—remains at the center of the inquiry.

The blows kept coming. That's when I realised that it's not the aircraft, it's the other guy who was in the cockpit with me.
— Captain Smit Machchhar, in a call with Prime Minister Netanyahu
Online toxicity isn't just corrosive, it's a warning sign. This pilot was telling the world who he was in his posts. Had anyone in charge been listening, nearly 200 people might never have been put in danger.
— Gur Megiddo, chief executive of Accountability!
Contattaci Domande frequenti